The Major Reasons For Leaving The European Union

With diminishing control of what happens in Britain, the British people decided it was best to vacate the union. The British were dealing with the laws given by the European members who were not living and experiencing the country themselves. To provide an example of a ghastly law given to the British people, they, as part of the European Union, were only allowed to catch 20% of the fish swimming in British territorial waters. What this meant was that tens of thousands of jobs were lost and they were not able to use one of the most significant resources given to them, as Britain is surrounded by ocean. Nigel Farage, Leader of the UK Independence Party, says that his fellow Englishmen, “effectively gave away the ability to look after one of our greatest resources to a bureaucracy based in Brussels.” Because of the way the government was set up, “Not only could the voters not change anything, but the institutes themselves are incapable of reform.” With an already maimed government, the European Union was creating more problems than it was solving. The British people had enough of giving up their rights as British citizens so the European Commission could tell them how to live. Therefore, with problems like those arising from the Union and with no hope to resolve them, Britain filed for secession and pulled out of the union

Since then, security and security risk management has been at the forefront for 10 years. Recently, Europe has seen many terrorist attacks forcing them to make changes. Some examples of this recent terrorism Began in March 2004, al-Qaida simultaneously detonated 10 bombs throughout the train lines of Spain’s capital city Madrid killing 191 people and injuring 2,050. In the United Kingdom (UK), London’s transportation network was attacked by suicide bombers killing 52 people and causing $52 million US dollars of damage. The UK has been one of the more successful European countries when it comes to catching terrorists. From 2001-2011, over 2,800 people have been arrested for terrorist related offences compared to the United States 154 people. In 2011, a single nationalist named Anders Behring Breivik bombed a government building in Oslo, Norway. One week later, he made his way to a Norwegian labor camp located 25 miles away and killed 69 more in another bombing. Recently, the past couple of years, a new terrorist group has begun to emerge called ISIS (Islamic State in Iraq and Syria). In November of 2015, a series of six attacks took place, 3 suicide bombers struck near the Stade de France followed by suicide bombings and mass shootings at cafés, restaurants and a music venue in central Paris. After this devastating attack ended, there were 130 dead and nearly 400 injured. The most recent attack by ISIS took place in March of 2016 at the airport in Brussels, Belgium. Two explosions had been set off killing 13 and wounding 81, and one hour later in downtown Belgium at Maelbech Metro Station, one bomb was set off killing 20 people and wounding

As the world evolves, people tend to move from country to country or within a country. Each country or city has its own push factors that push away immigrants, while others have pull factors that make immigrants drawn to that country or city. Furthermore, having to emigrate, immigrate, or migrate also has its barriers, making it harder to emigrate, immigrate or migrate to where settlers want to be, and there are reasons for why people decide to migrate, too. There are several reasons why people decide to emigrate, why they choose to immigrate to that place, and why not other places.

This article explains the “on-going” argument of whether or not Britain should remain in the European Union or leave. Prime Minister David Cameron vowed to keep Britain apart, winning the backing of most of most of his Cabinet and the goal of rival parties. Cameron has made it clear Britain is safer and stronger in the EU. However, much of Britain believes in opposition to their membership among the the European Union, leaving this as a constant

Due to the fact that the Tories were indeed voted into power, the referendum is scheduled to take place at some point within 2017, further intensifying this hot debate as to whether the UK should remain within the EU and integrate further or leave altogether.

As it's political . . . The EU, as well as National Socialism and Communism remain the three major ideological scourges of the 20th century. The UK survived the horrors of the concentration camps and Gulags of the European 20th century, intentionally staying away from the isms arising from Europe and the EU remains no different. The decision whether to remain or leave went a lot deeper than economics or social justice and reflects the drive towards a Eurocommunism, disguised as equality and foisted onto populations by elite politicians using treaties. Moreover, the BREXIT regional and social demographics reflected already indoctrinated Millennials, who mainly voted for socialist dependency, typical of a mass-produced ‘selfie’ generation.

For migrants, the United Kingdom has been a really attractive destination, and according to the 1991 census, “5.5 per cent of the population of Great Britain, or just about 3 million of the total population are from an ethnic group other than white.” Migrants have come to Britain for economic and political push circumstances in their countries of origin, and Britain seemed to a place that they could come and pursue a life with a higher probability of success and happiness. Specifically, after WWII, there was a large amount of labor migration from the Caribbean, South Asia, and Ireland, as the country attempted to rebuild.

Britain’s vote to exit from the European Union, termed as “Brexit”, took the world by surprise as polls during the campaigns have shown that 80% of voters will vote to remain in the EU (Erlanger 2016). The Brexit was led by Justice Minister Michael Gove and former Mayor of London Borris Johnson. The main issues were in regards to the nation’s sovereignty and immigration. Proponents believed that the EU had changed its bureaucracy in the past few decades which diminished British sovereignty and influence. Brexit was also favorable to other nation’s parties who were anti Europe , for instance, the French National Front leader, Marine Le Pen (Erlanger, 2016). Opponents of Brexit argued to stay within the EU as it would allow countries of similar minds to have a stronger influence in the world and warned that it would be economically devastating if voters decided

At the end of June, Great Britain made the decision to leave the European Union. A referendum was held where more than 70 percent of the UK voted(more than 30 million people). It resulted in a 52 to 48 percent win for those in favor of leaving. When dividing the United Kingdom into its sovereign states the division can be seen clearly: England and Wales voted strongly for Brexit, while Northern Ireland and Scotland backed up staying in the EU. Following the decision to leave the European Union, Prime Minister David Cameron resigned his position and British politics went went into chaos. Although the economy was expected to drop it was able to withstand the effect of the decision. However, the pound has dropped to its lowest point in three decades, 1.28. As well as affecting the pound, Brexit has affected Great Britain socially in regards to immigration. In this new environment, some immigrants have reported that they have stopped speaking their native tongue in public. Mothers are worried about their children being bullied at school. Younger immigrants say they fear discrimination over jobs and educational opportunities. The negative effects of Brexit have already began to show as nativist sentiment increases and the pound continues to lose value. It is safe to say that this referendum will be marked in history as it continues to change Britain in the future.

The question over whether or not Britain should leave the European Union has been a hotly debated topic in politics for almost a generation. Now, though, the British have finally taken action and held a referendum in which the people decided that they wanted to leave. Proponents of this decision celebrated and claimed that leaving would benefit the UK greatly by saving money and gaining more sovereignty in trade and immigration. However, there is reason to believe that this choice will not result in such positive outcomes for Britain. The UK’s referendum to leave the EU is a decision that will have negative consequences on the economic and social sectors of Britain and the EU.

Can you imagine that what will happen when the United Kingdom (UK) left the European Union

Envision a place, any place in the world, where people come and go, a serene environment that collaborates with the surrounding areas, all around living in unison. These places help each other like a well-oiled machine, when one country is down it is up to the others to help it get to its rightful place. Think of this as a union. But, then envision just one of the collaborating countries feeling the need to leave or break away from this union damaging not only the structure of the union but the overall welfare of their own nation. Think of this as an exit. This example given above is an example of the European Union when it first started but then Britain trying to break away from it because of the so called “economic defects” it has caused but in reality, Britain’s departure from the European Union will gravely affect the overall state of their nation.

The research within migration has pointed out that it is the level of net migration that should be studied to understand the overall change in the dynamics within the labour markets. The review of the longitudinal data from the UK has highlighted that the

There are few glaring events that will go down in history as the defining geopolitical events of this century. Great Brittan’s recent results from a referendum heldon on June 23, 2016 to decide if it should leave the European Union (EU) is one such glaring event. Brexit, the acronym for this referendum, is synonymous with the contemporary populist sentiment supporting nationalism, economic autonomy, curbing immigration, and defying elitist politicians who do not understand the reality of the working classes. As a result of feelings of lost power and economic insecurity by the working class people, the citizens of Britain voted 52% to 48% to leave the EU in hopes of industrial reform. It was a surprise even to those who voted yes to the referendum. Britten has a new Prime Minister, Theresa May, who still needs to work out how the exit will be negotiated within a two year time period.

As with most things relating to Brexit, political pressure within the EU favors pulling UK-dominated activities affecting the EU into EU member states. The ECB has already proposed changes to bring the UK under their direct supervision for clearing activity post-Brexit.