When a child exhibits challenging behavior in a classroom, his or her teacher must collect data to determine the functions of the behavior. The purpose of collecting data, from several different sources, is to provide information on when, where, and how often the challenging behavior occurs and how long it lasts.
Concerning the various sources in which data is collected, they can include; parents, other teachers, bus driver, principal, and the student. The means of collecting this data are from interviews, behavior rating scales, and direct observations. Regarding the different means, interviews are the first tools used to assess a behavior’s function. They will help determine the background of the problem behavior, the antecedents and consequences associated with the behavior, the times of day, places, and settings in which the behavior occurs or does not occur, and strategies that have already been tried. The behavior rating scales include a set of questions or statements to which parents, teachers, students, plus others respond to provide information about the problem behavior. These help identify antecedents, consequences, and reinforcers. Lastly, direct observations are when someone observes the student in the classroom and gathers information as to his or her problem behavior. These observations help to see when, where, and how often the problem behavior occurs, and how long it lasts.
Once the data is collected, it is coordinated by an education professional;
In order to do this, there needs to be a system established that collects data through detecting and monitoring individual, as well as situational, behavioral issues (Marzano, R., Marzano, J., & Pickering, 2003, pg.112); these may be a recurring, or severe, behavioral problems that happen in the school’s hallways, cafeteria, or on school grounds. To help in gathering this information the school can establish different charts and individual folders for each student. For example, a chart for behavioral referrals may be used to identify the student, the date, the teacher involved, the reason for involvement, and the student’s consequence (Marzano, R. J., & Association for Supervision and Curriculum, D., 2005, pg. 164). Another chart that can be useful and successful monitors individual student behaviors; this report will give data on a singular student, and it contains the date of incidents, the teacher involved, the behavioral offense, and the consequence given (Marzano, R. J., & Association for Supervision and Curriculum, D., 2005, pg. 165). This graph gives similar data to the behavioral referrals; however, it is more specific aiming detection on one student, not the entire grade or class level. The safety and disciplinary team
Many teachers are faced with the difficult task of managing their student’s behavior. Even if we
There are environmental and internal factors that could have an impact on a student’s behavior. Students with challenging behaviors are communicating to their teachers that their needs are not being met and something is not right. This communication is often in the form of problem behaviors.
This report detailing issues in behavior intervention first reviews information regarding the use of functional behavior assessments and then explains intervention strategies which may be effective in dealing with behavior issues in schools. In addition, issues that impede treatment are discussed. This source appears to be objectively written with the goal to inform the reader of functional behavior assessments, treatment for problem behavior and issues which may cause treatment to fail. This source may be useful when researching Behavior Intervention Plans because team members and
Class SPE 568 Behavior Assessment required me to conduct multiple assessments to understand the various methods there are to identify the cause of problem behavior. I have learned
As much as four times a day OM gets upset and start to scream at me or his follow students if something does not go exactly the way he wanted. He often cruse at his classmate and even push or hit them if the situation escalates.
In order to provide the Australia Park Victoria with the appropriate data to solve its current crisis, the most appropriate method of data collection for this research is the qualitative method. According to Gay and Airasian (p 627) qualitative method is the collection of extensive data on various variables over a long time in a natural setting with an aim of acquiring insights not possible using other methods. It involves three different kinds of information collection: direct observation, in depth and open-ended interviews and written documents. Qualitative method involves use of random sampling and structured data collection instruments that fit different experiences. The method also enables the researcher to study the specific area of
When carrying out research it is possible that more than one data collection method may be used in carrying out the research in order to obtain relevant and reliable conclusions and this is the approach that was used by the researcher and the research gurus call this triangulation. The data collected on the project is thus a blend of primary and secondary data. According to Blaxter et al. (2001) primary data is original data that is collected at source, such as, survey data or experimental data whereas secondary data is existing data set that presents interpretations, conclusions or knowledge additional to, or different from that presented in the original data source. In this section we look at the detailed procedures which were used by the researcher to gather the data.
When using Applied Behavior Analysis, the role of the teacher is crucial. For ABA to be used correctly, a teacher must keep documentation on every student. This documentation should be taken frequently and with precision. Little details such as a shift in interest should be documented. This documentation will show the progress each child makes in the process of modifying their behaviors. In addition to keeping thorough documentation, teachers must examine each student individually. In observing their interests, teachers can form individual enforcers for each student. For example, if a student always chooses to do puzzles during free time, puzzle pieces could be a reinforcer. Every time the student does something that deals with the positive modification of behavior, they can earn a puzzle piece. When all of the pieces are earned, they will be able to put the puzzle together. This method is beneficial when correcting a student’s behavior.
The behavior was observed from a large sample of people. This included twenty people shopping alone and twenty people shopping in a group, for a total of forty subjects, each ranging in ages from approximately 19 to 40 years old. The subjects were observed from the time they entered the store until the time they left. The reasoning behind this was to see the buying behavior differences for the whole experience and figure out which areas of the store could be improved in order to appeal to groups of people shopping. The behaviors observed included the amount of time spent inside the store, the amount of money spent, the interactions with associates, and the areas of the stores that were navigated.
Data gathering methods are often loosely controlled, resulting in out-of-range values (e.g., Income: -100), impossible data combinations (e.g., Gender: Male, Pregnant: Yes), missing values, etc. Analyzing data that has not been carefully screened for such problems can produce misleading results. Thus, the representation and quality of data is first and foremost before running an analysis.
Since the rapid growth of the cloud computing, data collection and information sharing are led to a higher level and are replacing the traditional computation. Several technologies using cloud in all areas are developing to adapt the revolution of information technology and one of them is cloud gaming.
is currently having difficulties with learning and behavior. frequently is out of his throughout the day, and answers aloud before being called on to give the answers and struggles to follow directions. also has learning difficulties in reading decoding and reading comprehension.
Data were collected through an ethnographic study using participant observation and personal interviews as data collection methods. An ethnography means to learn from people, rather than studying people (Glesne, 2011). This was taken into consideration as I stood in as an active participant twice a week for one and a half months. During this time, I assisted in feeding calves during the morning shift. I worked with all four employees during this time. As a participant observer, this gave me a unique opportunity to build trust and rapport with the four employees instead of attempting to simply observe and “study” them before interviewing.
The most common method used for getting information about the various things around us, is to observe those things and also the various processes related to those things. Hence, it can be said that observation acts as an important, fundamental and the basic method of getting information about anything. But it must be kept in mind that observation is not just seeing things but it is carefully watching the things and trying to understand them in depth, in order to get some information about them related to what it is intended to. Observations sometimes act scientifically, when used by the researchers in various research works but it should be noted that all observations are not scientific in nature. Scientists and nonscientists both rely on observation to learn behavior. The difference between the scientific and nonscientific observation is the manner in which the observations are made. Non scientists don’t usually keep formal records of the things they have observed so they consequently depend on the memory for the information of that event. But unfortunately what one remembers about an event is not likely to be a literal record of what one experienced and hence memory can be affected by the information later added about the event experience (Bartlett, 1932; Loftus, 1997a, 1997b; Pezdeick, Finger, & Hodge, 1997) whereas scientific observation on the other hand is made under precisely