The Path Way Leadership Style

Those that follow a transformational leadership framework believe that leaders possess many of the aforementioned qualities, but the focus is on one’s ability to inspire and empower others (Ross, Fitzpatrick, Click, Krouse, & Clavelle, 2014). These leaders literally ‘transform’ their followers by inspiring enthusiasm and performance towards a

Path-goal leadership is demonstrates how leaders can lead subordinates along the path to their goals. The four approaches to this are directive, supportive, participative and achievement-oriented. Directive leadership, “characterized a leader

In addition, Burns et al., (as cited by Lavoie-Tremblay, et al., 2015) defined a transformational leader as “a leader who can extend and elevate the interests of staff, who can facilitate the commitment of staff to the mission and values of the organization, and who can lead staff to rise above their personal interests” (p. 582). Further, Broome (2013) identified transformational leaders as “proactive and hold core beliefs about the potential for development of both individuals they work with and their organization” (p. 327). Samad et al.(2015), connecting transformational leadership to servant leadership and authentic leadership reported, “transformational leadership is also congruent with regards to fostering higher levels of motivation among the followers’ and leaders’ ability to visualize the unforeseen” (pp.

A1. Leadership Style Upon conducting research, it is clear that the definition of “leadership” is not agreed upon. It is fluid, based upon many perceptions, situations, and surroundings. According to Robinson (2010), adopting a specific style of leadership is rather futile as it is, “contingent on the personal traits of the leader, the people being led, and the nature of the activity.” Tools are available to help guide potential leaders in determining a preferred style of leadership. For example, utilizing the “Leadership Self-Assessment

This article examines the similarities and differences between transformational and servant leadership. The authors suggest the primary difference is the focus of the leader. The transformational leader’s focus is more on the organization and the servant leader’s focus is more on the follower. The authors state that both offer the conceptual framework for

When looking back in one’s career, each manager in the organization leads and develops employees differently. A person can apprehend that each leader has their own leadership style with

Authors such as Dugan (2017), consider Transformational Leadership and Servant Leadership similar, as both theories denote similar behavioral traits. However, Gregory Stone, Russel, and Patterson (2004) found that there are key differences between these two types of leadership styles. The distinction lies within the leader’s focus. Transformational leaders focus on the organizational goals and the greater good of the mission. While Servant Leaders concentrate on the people or the followers and their needs. Servant Leaders want to take care of their people and they find that if they take care of their follower’s needs, the mission gets accomplished because followers want to do a good job for their leader (Gregory Stone, et al., 2004).

Transformational leadership theory applies four factors for leaders to influence employees to perform beyond their abilities. These factors describes leaders that promote leadership through idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individual consideration (Shresh & Rajini 2013).Transformational leaders are deem as the most effective leadership style because of their character strengths as a excellent role model who leads by example and manage people based on their strengths and weaknesses to optimizes the organization performance (Shresh, & Rajini, 2013). Transformational leaders are known to reward, encourage and mentor people based on performance through inspiration, creativity, and innovation to solve problems to exceed expectation of the organization (Smith,

According to J. Seyfarth, there are four types of leadership styles: directive, supportive, participative, and achievement-oriented leadership (Seyfarth, 1996). These styles vary from one another, but all may be visible within a school environment. During a recent interview with an elementary school principal, Amy Zilbar, she described her dominate leadership style as supportive (personal communication, April 25, 2013).

In 1985, Bernard Bass expanded upon the work of Burns by attempting to determine and define how transformational leadership impacts follower outcomes. Bass postulates that transformational leaders are able to share their vision with followers and resultantly influence inspirational outcomes, and he identified four elements of transformational leadership: individualized consideration, intellectual stimulation, inspirational motivation, and idealized influence (1985). In a departure from Burn’s belief that transactional and transformational leadership are mutually exclusive styles (1978), Bass suggests that truly effective leadership must demonstrate both transformational and transactional style (1985).

Transformational Leadership transcends multiple situations. Leaders utilize the four components of Transformational leadership which include idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration (McCleskey, 2014; Robbins & Judge, 2016; Stone, Russell, & Patterson, 2004). Leaders that employ Transformational Leadership often have highly desirable personality traits that are modeled, and then emulated by followers as a method of idealized influence (Marques, 2015). The transformational leader is able to generate inspirational motivation within an individual by empowerment of the follower through communication of shared goals and sense (Stone, Russell, & Patterson, 2004). Intellectual stimulation is achieved thorough the leader engaging the follower in problem solving and innovation for solutions (Robbins & Judge, 2016; Stone, Russell, & Patterson, 2004). Furthermore, the transformational leader connects with the follower through mentorship and acknowledgement of the individual versus the team (Stone, Russell, & Patterson, 2004). To conclude, Transformational Leadership is a successful tool for managing change, as the transformational leader is able to create a shared vision, generate support for change, and successfully implement and maintain the change (Marques, 2015). Relative to the scenario, Transformational Leadership is paramount for successful change due to the engagement of the followers with the shared vision of the

Transformational leadership theory is the process whereby the leaders attends to the needs and motives of their followers so that the interaction advance each to higher levels of morality and motivation (Yoder-Wise, P., 2014, pg. 10). In its most optimal form, it produces positive and valuable change within the followers with the purpose of developing the followers into leaders. When a leader embodies transformational leadership, they enhance the morale, motivation and performance of followers with various techniques. These techniques include helping the followers to connect their sense of self and identity to the mission and the collective identity of the organization; inspire followers by being their role model; challenge followers to go

The main content in the article is to compare and contrast both similarities and differences of transformational leadership and servant leadership. Transformational leadership was introduced by James MacGregor Burns (1987) and Bernard M. Bass (1985a) while servant leadership was developed by Robert Greenleaf (1997). Both leadership concepts are frequently applied or adopted by the researches and people who engage in the industry.

An effective leader influences their employees in a desired manner to achieve goals and objectives. Different leadership styles can affect an organization’s effectiveness and performance. The objective of this paper is to analyze the review of literature on various leadership styles over the past years and how effective and ineffective different leadership styles are in the workplace.

Transformational leaders are proactive, inspire, provide individualized consideration, intellectual stimulation and idealized influence to their staff. Learning opportunities are created, encouragement to solve problems and development of strong emotional bonds are tools transformational leaders provide. Finally transformational leaders possess integrity, vision, rhetorical and management skills, and motivate staff to aspire to goals beyond self-interest. Transactional leaders focus on setting objectives or goals and creating a reward system upon attainment of the goals. Google exhibits the transformational style of leadership that comes in part from their servant leadership style. Smith (2004) defines six components of servant leadership: valuing people, developing people, building community, displaying authenticity, providing leadership, sharing leadership the style adopted by Google leadership