The Principal Difference Between Rbd And Dynamic Capabilities Theory

1888 Words May 19th, 2016 8 Pages
The principal idea of this theory is the capacity of the companies to adapt, reconfigure as such, as reintegrate internal and external skills, competencies and resources in reaction to the changes in a competitive environment. (Teece, Pisano and Shuen, 1997) The flexibility in this case is crucial and the ability to sustain a competitive advantage in a business market that change constantly as well rapidly, is essential. The principal difference between RBD and Dynamic capabilities theory is while the first focus more in achieve sustainable competitive, the second specify actions more centred in the capacity of the company to remain in intense competitive environment. The capacity of the employees in Organization to reorganized and learning rapid as well constantly, it is extremely important to build efficient strategies in this scenario of continual transitions. The critic regards to this framework consider that it is not clear the value-added relating to already existing concepts, not substantial theory foundation, a lack of empirical support, as such, as the practical applications are not clear. However, the framework is gaining popularity, considering exposed a situation is experienced by many Organizations nowadays, the necessity of continual adaptation in an extremely competitive environmental and that demand a large investment in innovation to maintain their position in the industry.
IBM is a company that has experienced diverse changes through this years, based on…
Open Document