The Pros and Cons of Paying College Athletes Essay

the question or topic of paying college athletes has been given much debate. Countless studies show that this idea has many negative factors associated with it, which in-return make it unreasonable. The cons associated with the idea of paying college/amateur athletes include that many student-athletes already receive scholarships and other benefits, paying college athletes could detract from the purity of the game, and the process of figuring out how to pay these athletes would be extremely difficult

Should college student athletes be paid for the services they offer during their years of study? This has been one of the biggest, ongoing debates in college sports for years. Successes of bigger schools such as, the University of Alabama and the University of Texas in today’s society are major contributors to this debate. Those that are pro-salary argue that college athletes bring in too much revenue at their schools not to be paid. In my opinion, college athletes should not get paid because they

The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) makes roughly $1 billion in income annually and the athletes do not receive any of it. This topic has been debated for many years and is still being debated. The debate dates back to the 1980s and now athletes are demanding that they deserve to be paid since profits are made off of them. Some athletes such as former and current basketball and football players came together with lawsuits to federal courts asking for rewards from profits NCAA makes

A college education is the most valuable education that most only dream of, a dream not made reality due to not being financially fit to pay for college. Instead of paying full tuition, students are able to pay for college with an athletic scholarship. Whether it be a full ride or the scholarship paying part of it students can play sports while their studies are being covered. But a scholarship doesn't cover necessities like living, food, and travel expenses, but the National Collegiate Athletic

Should college athletes get paid? 69% of people say yes they should. On the other hand, 31% of people disagree. The people say yes because of their dedication and hard work for the sport, while they don't have time for a side job. The people that say no, say this because the school that offered them a scholarship is already saving them and their family a lot of money. People say yes and no and will fight about college athletes getting paid. People think that college athletes should be paid because

Paying colleges athletes is one of the biggest debates in college sports history. The argument has been around for at least a decade, with people believing in positive effects and negative effects. College athletes have been playing sports without pay since the beginning. It has begun to gain popularity within the last few years due to incidents such as Reggie Bush. He received more than $100,000 in financial aid from the University of Southern California. Paying or giving gifts to players is a violation

College athletes should not in any way or fashion be paid or get any incentives whatsoever by the coaches or the universities for their play on the field or on the court. The players already have a humongous advantage in the classroom by getting extra help and attention by the professors, having an advantage in the work field by having high paid jobs lined up for them when they aren’t playing or practicing, and also getting to experience all the different cities they get to travel to and all the

College athletes should be paid. The athletes put in as much work as the people who do get paid. Why should they not be paid? There are many pros for why they should get paid, but there are also many cons on why they should not get paid. The athletes should get paid because of how hard they work in season and the off-season. Do not pay all of the athletes, but pay the ones who are at a D1 college. The athletes should get paid because they put in the same amount of time as the pros do, and the pros

campuses and across the college conferences. And it’s shocking to see the level of support the answer “yes” is getting—because the idea tears at the very nature of amateur college sports” (Should). There are views from both sides as this is quite the controversial subject in the sporting world. Looking at the facts, it is difficult to decide either way. First off, we must decide what qualifies under the pay to play category. There are numerous ways that college athletes can be compensated for

Lindsey Simmerman Speech 102 T/Th 1:00-2:15 October 25, 2016 Should college athletes be paid to play? Specific Purpose: To persuade the class to agree with my stance on paying college athletes to play sports Thesis: College football is the hours players spend practicing and performing, the number of injuries the players face, and the persona these athletes must portray every day all the while watching their schools, coaches, and the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) get all the compensation