The Role Of Dual Citizenship In The Democratic States

Citizenship will always be a relevant concept because when you are a citizen of a particular country it comes with a sense of belonging. There is a feeling of pride when you become a citizen of a country. In particular, if your family is from that country it can help to gain a sense of community with those around you. It is important for people to feel that they are citizens of the same country as their children. Sometimes legal citizenship changes a person’s perspective and they feel that they belong but often there is still a chance people may be excluded based on external factors, for example, they have a different religion to the majority of a particular community. That’s why it is important for people to be social citizens as well so that they can

Despite the all evidences that politics is allowing all kind of cultural diversity to grow within same territory. Those countries which have different cultures are trying to make their state a multicultural state in order to live with peace, for growth and development. This paper discusses about the past present and future of multiculturalism. Cultural diversity from very beginning was existing in different nation There are Jews in Germany, Poles in Ireland, Asians in Canada and so on but the level at which Multiculturalism have reached today became a political issue for those countries which have cultural diversities. People of different cultural diversity are enjoying the same rights and people are practicing different cultures as and extended form of their liberty. People have the freedom to do whatever they want but with in the framework of laws.So the people are exercising the libety of practicing their own culture.There is a discussion about remarkable history of multiculturalism, present position of multiculturalism and the future of multiculturalism. There is advancement is polity for a better sustainment of a country with diversity in culture of people. This popular master narrative is too quick to herald the death of multiculturalism, and mischaracterizes the nature of the experiments undertaken, exaggerates the extent to which they have been abandoned, and misidentifies not only the limitations encountered but also the options for addressing these

Citizenship is the legal status of an individual living within a particular country. Having citizenship gives people rights and responsibilities as well as a sense of belonging to a community. Citizenship can influence the lives of people as it gives people a sense of identity and how to live their life.

P1 – Explain the range of meanings attached to citizenship, diversity and the associated terminology

This from of citizenship arose in the Treaty of West Phalli that ended the one hundred year war. The treaty stated that each state had economic sovereignty and control over its’ territorial boundaries. This form of citizenship is a way in which to delineate individuals of one nation from another. The concepts for which this form of citizenship is based on were created over four hundred years ago and are no longer an adequate way of looking at citizenship. Globalization and interdependence among various nations has challenged the idea of national sovereignty.

In James Buck essay, “citizenship and Military Service: The Quest for inclusion by Minorities and conscientious Objectors”, he discusses why every citizen in this our liberal democracies should be given equal status and recognitions in our political communities. He makes his analysis by comparing the various researches other social and political scientist have made about citizenship in the eighteenth centuries and how political inequalities have limited or change the realization of equal claim of citizenship. He also emphasizes that citizenship is not about the wealth or the amount of power one has, but it’s rather the respect and recognitions from our fellow citizen. He supports his argument with Max Weber studies that “the subject of class, power and status are relatively independent dimensions of ones standing in society”. He also discusses the “changes in

The United States is not the only country that questions the necessity for dual citizenship. This article is surrounding the issue of dual citizenship in Canada but it highlights similar issues to those brought up in debates on this subject in the U.S. The main argument is if people with dual citizenships should receive the same treatment as a plain citizen. Choosing to live in a particular country shows one’s commitment and membership to a country. By attempting to become a citizen of another country may seem like a betrayal of the original country. This article, similar to many op-eds surrounding this issue, uses ethos to prove its point. The morals surrounding criminal activity and its consequences are stated. The argument is how people

A dictionary definition of citizenship states it as a position of being a citizen in a particular country/ region. Nakano Glenns definition is much more concentrated, focused on the details, and combines this status of citizenship along with gender and race. Glenn shows how the definition of citizenship changes when including race as well as gender and how this meant that white men were mainly seen as rightful citizens while minorities were effectively left out of this definition. Glenn writes in chapter two titled, Citizenship: Universalism and Exclusion, about integrating the definitions of race as well as gender into the meaning of citizenship. Glenn makes an effort to assert the historical authenticity of the meaning of citizenship,

To be a citizen, means to be a member of a nation. It truly is an honour to be a member of the Canadian nation. As Canadians, we have many privileges and advantages that makes us proud. We value freedom and respect for religious, cultural and race differences. My aim in this essay, is to mainly discuss the importance and advantages of Canadian citizenship as well as reasons why people may want to settle here. Some points that I will be considering are, both the healthcare and education systems, and our multiculturalism act.

I think that a federal court can exercise jurisdiction over the parties based on diversity of citizenship. According to the textbook, "when parties to a lawsuit are from different states, a federal court can exercise diversity jurisdiction if the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Total diversity of citizenship must exist, however.” In this case, because Joe and Kay were not from the same state, it is a diversity suit. Moreover, “The statute does not mention the citizenship of partnerships, LLCs, and other unincorporated associations, but the courts have tended to regard these entities as citizens of every state of which their members are citizens.” If Café Ole was a corporation, the state citizenship of the owner would be unimportant.

Over the past 300 years, many people immigrate to developed countries for better welfare, their families or other reasons but some countries restrict immigration for avoiding excessive migrants, such as the United States and Britain. One of the main reasons why people support the policy is that they think immigration brings a lot of disadvantages to their country. It goes without saying that some people will be dissatisfied on restriction immigration policy because they firmly believe their interests are damaged. Moreover, people should attempt to understand the perspective of others is that the benefits which are brought by immigration, such as the positive financial impacts, have little or no effect on crime rates and cultural diversity,

“Citizenship policies and ideas of nationhood in Scandinavia” discusses immigration policies in Scandinavian countries. It gives examples on how the Scandinavian countries have reviewed and looked at policies from 19th century until today. In the first part, I will discuss citizenship in the three countries, in the second part I will argue around the topic of language requirements and national identity. The whole will end in a conclusion about how different the countries are in terms of renewal of policies and integration. This essay will aim to look at the articles key contribution and discuss the main arguments straights and weaknesses.

The way of being appointed to become a senator has been undemocratic in nature from its creation. There are very few written rules and principles to appoint individuals, and very few rules for senators to successfully represent the region they reside in due to political patronage and partisanship.

To understand how U.S. citizens that legally declare more than one citizenship, and thus participate in multiple cultural identities, first, it is important to analyze power and culture, then how the physical body of these individuals move through the spaces that enable their dual citizenship. Power exists in many forms, from the way in which society is structured through basic laws of existence, to the power that governs social behavior and the ways in which we understand the world in its entirety. Systemic power structures even the ways in which immigrants who hold green cards, or refugee status become citizens, and is deeply embedded in a flawed United States immigration system. The way in which this legal power is portrayed in citizenship

Citizenship is highly coveted in many nations, so coveted in fact that through only a few processes can one become a citizen for most nations, might that process be natural birth or naturalization. Citizenship and its privileges were also highly valued in Rome, except becoming a citizen was extremely difficult if not impossible. Roman citizenship also leads to assassinations and war within the Italian peninsula. There is a complex history to Roman citizenship.