The U.S. Constitution was created to establish America 's national government and fundamental laws in order to guarantee the citizen 's rights. It was signed on September 17, 1787 at the Constitutional Convention held in Philadelphia. Before the Constitution was written, the Articles of Confederation is what America was governed by. Under the Articles of Confederation, the nation was weak and the states were run like they were independent countries. At the Philadelphia Convention, delegates formulated a plan to have a stronger government by having three branches and a system of checks and balances. This would ensure that no single branch would obtain too much power. Many people today have different views on
The Supreme Court is a very
…show more content…
This simply means that he believes that the constitution should be interpreted literally. Throughout the course of this paper, I will explain the similarities and the differences that are presented with each of these different views and what my opinions of these views are at the end. Stephen Breyer 's viewpoint is strictly democratic. “Literalism has a tendency to undermine the Constitution’s efforts to create a framework for democratic government” (510) is a quote that explains Breyer 's view very well. Breyer looks at the constitutional purposes and consequences saying that they need to first look at what the original law was intended to do and prevent. On the other side of that, they also want to look at the punishments that went along with each policy. Breyer argues that any question you have about the original text can be answered by looking at what the original law was intended for. He said this, “A focus on purpose seeks to promote active liberty by insisting on interpretations, statutory as well as constitutional, that are consistent with the people 's will (514).” If you are going to resolve the problems that arise in a governmental setting, you must have a better grasp on democratic objective. You need to understand original democracy and why the laws were put in place, in order to understand the textual meeting of the original constitution. He believes that the original text is not enough to go off of if you do not have an understanding of the context
“The U.S. Constitution established America’s national government and fundamental laws, and guaranteed certain basic rights for its citizens. It was signed on September 17, 1787, by delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, presided over by George Washington. Under America’s first governing document, the Articles of Confederation, the national government was weak and states operated like independent countries.” (history.com) “The articles of confederation was the first written constitution of the United States, the articles of confederation was ratified March 1, 1781.” (brainly.com)
The United States of America has been governed by two Constitutions in its entire history. The Articles of Confederation came into play on March 1, 1781 and was later ratified on June 21, 1788, later known as The Constitution. These important documents allowed our nation to protect itself and ensure the existence of The United States of America. The Articles of Confederation as well as The Constitution allowed for boundaries and rules to be set in place to protect the basic rights of citizens and establish a strong government. One of the greatest documents in all of U.S. history, the Constitution of United States of America was created.
The constitution guarded against tyranny by giving us federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and large vs. small states. The constitution was written in Philadelphia in the year of 1787. This established America’s national government and fundamental laws
Created on November 15, 1777 and ratified by the first 13 colonies on March 1, 1781, the articles of confederation is known for being the first constitution of the united states. “The constitution provides a division of powers, meaning it assigns certain powers to the national government and reserves others for the states.” (crouse, slide 4) The constitution is needed because if we didn't have it the government would be weak and would most likely have no power. Framers of the constitution chose a system of government on a territorial basis, between a central government and several states. “ the framers were worried about the government being too powerful because; government power inevitably poses a threat to individual liberty. Therefore the
During the American Revolution, the founding fathers wrote the Articles Confederation, a written set of laws that intended to provide a framework for government. The Articles of Confederation failed to create an effective form of government and could not promote stability for the nation. In 1787, 55 delegates met in Philadelphia to revise the Articles of Confederation. The result was an entirely new document, the United States Constitution. The United States Constitution addressed the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, promote unity through compromise, and established a framework for government that effectively promotes the ideals of American Government.
In the hot, humid summer of 1787 state delegates met for the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia and drafted a new frame of government for the United States: the United States Constitution. A new federal system of government was set forth which distributed powers between the state and federal government and created three branches of government as checks and balances for each other. The new Constitution also gave the new government the power to both tax and regulate commerce.
The Constitution was created to interchange the failing Articles of Confederation. At the top of the American Revolutionary War, the founders had created the Articles of Confederation as a technique to permit states to stay their individual powers whereas still gaining of the good thing about being a part of a bigger entity. The Articles had gone as a result on March one, 1781. However, by 1787 it became apparent that they weren't viable within the future. This particularly became clear once, in 1786, Shay's Rebellion
The U.S Constitution states the basic rights of a U.S citizen and was signed at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia on September 17th, 1787 (History.com, The U.S Constitution) . The document replaced the Articles of Confederation, after states decided the it was not fitting their certain needs. Because the needs of each state weren’t being fulfilled, the delegates of each state came together in Philadelphia to sign off and discuss the document and later would be called the Constitutional Convention. The Articles of Confederation wasn’t so much as the base or framework as the Constitution, but more as a deal or friendship between the states at the time. The Articles of Confederation also only setup one single type of government that was made up of Delegates representing each state containing one vote for each single state. The votes would collectively make decisions for all states and if nine out of the 13 states favored in an idea the decision and it would be enforced to all territories. Instead of revising the Articles of Confederation, the thirteen delegates from each state met in Philadelphia to create a completely new set of laws and government that would hopefully meet the standards for each state. This meeting, held in Philadelphia of 1787 would be called the Constitutional convention and would hold lots of problems between more populated states and less populated states.
The United States Constitution was established in 1787. This was needed to help establish America’s government. “The national government was comprised of a single legislature, the Congress of the Confederation; there was no president or judicial branch.” (History. com Staff) The Articles of Confederation gave Congress power to do many things such as control war and money. This was created during the American Revolution and served as America’s first Constitution. This was needed because this was a time where citizens were leaving Britain and we were trying to get our freedom. Back in 1765, many Americans were getting frustrated with Britain since they had just placed the Stamp Act which put a tax on any paper item. Then, in 1773, the
In order to better understand Justice Antonin Scalia’s approach towards judicial interpretation it is essential that we first distinguish the difference between common law and statutory law. Common law according to Scalia is judge made law where precedents are established and used to decide future cases. On the other hand, statutory law is written law that is set down by legislators. Scalia makes the argument in which he explains that judges abuse their power by interpreting statutory text in the way a common-law judge would interpret common law. In turn Justice Antonin Scalia offers his judicial interpretation approaches as solutions to constrain judges who abuse their power. Justice Antonin Scalia was an originalist and a textualist
The Constitution was written so that the Federal Government would actually have some ability to govern unlike it had in the previous Articles of Confederation. They wished to establish a more organized justice system which under the Articles, was the States responsibility and could vary greatly from place to place. They also wanted the ability to raise an Army, to help protect its citizen’s lives and liberties. After The Revolution many of the founding fathers feared a large government and preferred smaller and more localized forms of government. And with that lead to the Articles of Confederation, the original governing documents, that assembled a very weak and decentralized Federal Government and the States had most of the power. Years later many of the founders did not feel that this was the best form of government, getting the States to assemble and agree on nearly any bill was impossible including funding for the Federal Governments very existence.
When relating a historical document to a contemporary situation, context is integral to proper analyzation. In the case of the United States Constitution, many political theorists share their opinion, on what they believe to be, the optimal interpretation of the document, however, only Antonin Scalia’s originalist ideology repels personal and moral views during analysis and encourages understanding the Constitution as originally intended. It is not the job of a United States judge, nor should it be the job of one, to intervene their personal beliefs and morals with the law when making a judicial decision. Instilling inappropriate factors in legal decisions causes potential inconsistency and, occasionally, bias, both of which would set
It was accepted on November 15, 1777, by Congress and confirmed by the state on March 1, 1781. The Articles of Confederation were a respectful effort by a new country and to create an ideal national government. Although to some states that form of government was not happy because the Articles of Confederation will soon become a disadvantage. The Constitution Of United States was established in 1787. The Constitution of United States was written as a set of rules for this country. Many of the “rules” have helped the country stay in order. The constitution gave more power to the national government than the Articles of Confederation.
Comparing the two, Dworkin is right to assert his belief that the US Constitution should not be interpreted to be compatible with the concrete expectations of those long before our time. In particular areas, the understanding of existing constitutional law goes out farther than the original understandings of the framers of the Constitution. In many instances, Scalia’s originalism would fail to fit current practices in society.
The Constitution of the United States of America was ratified in 1789. It begins with, “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” The constitution was to serve basic rights to citizens, such as establishing fairness between each and every individual, insure that all men are treated equally, and insure that the Federal Government, along with the executive branch, maintains the law and peace inside the country. This means that it tries to prevent altercations and rebellion inside and outside of the country. It was ratified in Philadelphia on September 17.1787 by delegates to the Constitutional Convention.