The Use Of Animals For Research Testing Essay

It is no secret that millions of animals a year are used for medical experimentation. One study “found the number of animals tested rose from 1,566,994 in 1997 to 2,705,772 in 2012” (Casey). It is my belief that researchers use virtue theory to defend their experimentations. While animal activists approach experimentation through the ethics of care. I am against animal experimentation, but I will also provide insight into why people believe it is ethically just.

are not able to give consent for this as would be required of a human. Other

Aleesha Bender Specific Purpose: To inform my audience about the society of animal testing. Central Idea: I will discuss the history behind animal testing, the advantages of animal testing, and the disadvantages of animal testing. Introduction I. Attention: Bonzo is a 2 month old, Rhesus Macaque breed monkey. He was born in an experimental laboratory, and after just a few short days of being born he was ripped away from his mother’s arms into the hands of the experimenters who would now be his only family.

Animal testing is when animals are used in different tests, experiments, and studies. These tests, experiments, and studies often result in the harm and/or death of the animals. People often say the animals are used in order to benefit humans, such as making sure that products are safe and helping make advancements in medicine. When people use everyday products, most never think about how the product was determined to be safe. The animal’s involuntary sacrifice is almost never even a thought in most people’s minds. These animals undergo cruel treatment, harmful experiments, and even death for the “benefit” of humans.

Animal testing has become a controversial issue among many people in the world today. Some of these people involved in this controversial debate believe that animal testing is unethical and should be replaced by other methods. The other group of people in this debate believe that animal testing is necessary in order to research new products that cannot be tested on humans. Traditional animal testing forces animals to undergo numerous experiments for different forms of research. Medical, cosmetic, and many other types of research experiments use animals to provide the results on how the new product may affect humans. There are many people that support the use of alternative methods to animal research and then

Animal testing is an intense shared subject, with an enormous deal of emotion, passion, and thoughts on both sides concerning the ethics of this practice. In attendance there is a grey area as well, as some people support animal testing only under special situations whereas they contest its use for other

Thesis statement: It is neither acceptable nor necessary to conduct experiments on animals for human purposes • Pro argument 1: Topic sentence: Animal testing is an inhumane and cruel exercise A) Animal experimentation is not ethical and it causes suffering and pain beyond measure a) Test animals are subjected to prolonged physical restraint, forced feeding, and food and water deprivation b) They are also physically hurt by intentional wounding, mutilations, intentional burning, neck-breaking, and even decapitation B) Tens of thousands of animals die every year during experiment a) Animals have the right to live their lives freely b) Insane experiments, such as lethal dose 50 • Pro argument 2: Topic sentence: There are other alternatives which can effectively replace animals as test subjects in cruel experiments A)

Roughly 26 million animals every year are turned over for animal testing (Procon.org). It has been practiced for thousands of years, with the first instance of animal research dating back to around 500 BC (and even then many frowned upon it). People who are for animal testing voice that it has created life-saving treatment for humans as well as animals. Those who are against it say that it’s an inhumane and cruel form of research, and there are better, safer alternatives scientists can use to continue with their

Animal testing has been a controversial problem in today’s society and it affects people from all over the world1 not just animal activists or scientists. Most of the products and medicines used today have been tested on animals. These animals used in experiments have been thought to only benefit society but morally this hurts our society. This hurts our society because now animal testing has become a social normality and then humans have started to become null to this as time goes on. This slippery slope will only get worse if this is not stopped. This also hurts our society because scientist, physicians, and lawmakers must decide the justification for

90% of your everyday items are tested on animals. The term animal testing refers to procedures performed on living animals for purpose of research into basic biology. These brands: Lysol, Clorox, Tide, Clean & Clear, Johnson and Johnson, Aquafresh, Almay, and many more all test on animals. More than 90% of people agreed that the use of animals in research is essential. In 2010 Minnesota used more cats for testing than any other state, they used 2,703 cats. New Jersey used the most dogs, they used 6,077. Massachusetts used the most primates, they used 7,458. Using animals for testing should be illegal.

For many years, there has been numerous debate on animal testing. There is a problem in many countries with animal testing; It remains to be very controversial because it has to do with animals being tested with chemicals. The reason for the debate is that it's hard to determine the rights animals have. Some individuals believe that the research is outdated and inhumane while others believe animal testing is necessary to help further evolve medical research. Although this has been a never-ending war, many think there may not be a solution and with a battle, there come two sides of every argument. On one hand, there is the animal activist and on the other hand, it is the people who are for animal testing. Both groups are significantly impacted

Animal experimentation by scientists can be cruel and unjust, but at the same time it can provide long term benefits for humanity. Animals used in research and experiments have been going on for 2,000 years and keep is going strong. It is a widely debated about topic all over the world. Some say it is inhuman while others say it’s for the good of human kind. There are many different reasons why people perform experiments and why others total disagree with it.

Animals should be used for research and Experimentation because if the animals get sick or show any signs of acting abnormal then the scientists know it isn’t safe for humans to use. Animal research has played a big role in nearly every medical breakthrough over the last decade. Animals have the same organ system that perform the same task, which helps determine if what is being tested is safe for humans to use. Most of the medicines animals use the same medicine as humans like antibiotics, pain killers, and many more this helps to see if the medicine cures the animals without any harmful consequences then it would be safe and useful for humans to use.

“Beauty without cruelty” is the outcry that can be heard from animal right activists around the world. The FDA does not require companies to perform tests on animals but if the cosmetic product contains chemicals that can be seen as toxins, testing becomes a necessity. There are currently thirteen safety tests that are performed on animals.

Observation and experimentation are how we as humans have been able to learn more about ourselves and the world and universe we live in. One of the most common methods of experimentation is animal testing. However, there are controversies surrounding animal testing. There are some that believe animal testing to be cruel and overdone, advocating for the eradication of the practice and further reliance alternative research methods. Groups like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and other animal rights advocates fall in this category. There are some that believe animal testing to be an invaluable resource and should continue, such as some scientists and research groups. However, there appears to me to be a consensus that is closer to the middle: the belief and understanding that while there are benefits to animal testing, there are flaws in the practice and there should be changes to increase its efficacy while we simultaneously explore alternate testing methods. Many scientists and the National Institute of Health (NIH) subscribe to this idea. I aim to explore the benefits, problems, and implications of animal testing in order to reach a more informed conclusion about a position that is most validated by the information I have used.