preview

Trouillot's Silencing The Past

Decent Essays

The French general Napoleon Bonaparte said once that “History is the version of past events that people have decided to agree upon.” Whether this is for better or worse, what can be agreed is that this has been done by many groups of people. These groups are forced to redefine their history against historical progress, especially nations, as this poses a threat to the survival of a nation and the unity of its people. Historical progress, an inevitable phenomenon that occurs as people move forward and discover more about their past, has the potential to make citizens question the actions of their nation and their nationality. Because of the substantial threat that historical progress poses, many leaders try to safeguard their nations by adjusting history. Some of the best examples of this have occurred in African nations, and have …show more content…

He states that “Power does not enter the story once and for all, but at different times and from different angles.” When the leaders of African nations use these tactics to rewrite history and solidify their position in the country, the leaders also project their power. By rewriting and reinterpreting history through their own lens, the leaders solidify their place in history. However, rewriting history does not just make an impact on the leader and their legacy. It also makes an impact on national history, and, therefore, on the power of the nation as an idea. By refocusing national history, it gives citizens the memories they should have (in the eyes of those in power) to take pride in their nation. This serves to perpetuate the idea of the nation and solidify what it means to recognize oneself as being of that nationality. It is this, as stated by Renan, the “forgetting, and … historical error” done by those with power, that causes a nation to solidify its place and

Get Access