preview

Truth In The Black Mountains

Decent Essays

Early on in The Truth Is a Cave in the Black Mountains, By Neil Gaiman, the reader is very subtly told that the narrator is on the trail for a man. This is where the story starts as “[he] found him by accident” (1). The whole journey is, however, lead in search of gold in the cave of the black mountains. An obvious venture for a mortal man. But the narrator may not be purely mortal. This indirect mysticism runs rampant, boggling our minds with mysteries of who’s, what’s, and why’s. Our questions are answered, however they are not. A deeper look into the context of our questions by looking through the story may not give us a single solid answer, but in fact quite a multifarious amount.

When a story is told in first person we know …show more content…

What drove the speaker? At first glance we say gold. However, our narrator never actually says that he is in search for gold. Everyone he meets, whether it be Calem MacInnes or the ferry man, just assumes that he isn’t smart enough to heed the warnings of the cursed gold and leave. One thing is certain, our narrator “had searched for nearly ten years… [and] found him by accident” (Geiman 1) ;which is quite obviously talking about finding his daughters murderer Calum. As time passes the two grow suspicious of each other almost to a point of absolute distrust leading to murder. As the narrator finally arrives and enters the cave, Calum stays behind because he says he would never enter again, we are not met with what we thought would have been “bars of gold … stacked like firewood, and bags of golden coins … between them … golden chains and golden rings, and golden plates, heaped high like the china plates in a rich man’s house” (Geiman 13). But rather some kind of ghost or specter or possibly even his subconscious waits for him instead. The apparition continues to tell him, or better yet, reveal in his mind the truth. Is this all he was after? Now that he has the truth what will it cost him? His happiness? His soul? Or is the truth enough of a …show more content…

This depends on a multitude of things such as what the meaning of soul is; whether it is the Christian soul that leads to a heaven or hell or just the part of a person that makes them truly good and decent. We are intimate with knowledge of one charater, the adventurers guide Calum, and know that he has once before taken the gold. We can tell that Calum has never really been a great person; having been a Border Reiver in his youth. Now because we can distinguish what he is, or at least what he used to be, we recognize where and when the story took place. “Border Reivers lived on the border of Scotland and England … stealing cattle and sheep from the opposite marches” (3406) during the 13th and 17th centuries. Therefore we also know they were more than likely pagan, not believing in a Christian heaven or hell; thus, rules out our two previous concepts of a soul. However, if we were to look back in time to see what the story could be based off of we see a match. Just as the allegory of the cave, in the Republic by Plato, gives the meaning that senses cannot be trusted; the narrator, too, finds out that the truth was not what he sensed, and that Calum was the one who killed his daughter. The cave dwellers in Plato’s story were absolutely ignorant of the truth because they relied only on what they saw. Just as those who took from the cave were

Get Access