Vehicle Safety Essay

Even though the simulators cannot exactly replicate the real world, it is growing to be widely used for research studies. It is appreciated that it can provide a specific conditionand motion are difficult to experience in driving simulator

In this article, Peters and Peters discuses about the risk of multitasking while driving. Not only they propose a problem, but also tries to give the reader an alternative ways of preventing the cause of an accident. He gives us three-risk factors that can reduce the chances of getting into an accident. They suggest having a printed and audible warning to warn the drivers not to use the device unless the vehicle is not moving, an integrated system “which all device are either shut off or out of driver’s sight when the vehicle is in motion” and finally, “ marketing and dealer restraint”. If these warnings are available in the vehicle, there should be a less chance to be distracted and cause an accident and also, this can be useful thing to create in the vehicle to remind the driver not to multitask while

It is designed with high-quality seats, infotainment functions such as radio receivers, cruise control, well-built instrument panel in conjunction with on-screen display, which will show in the car at any point in time the user what is happening.

Knight rode in a Cadillac DTS at the General Motors research center to get a true and up close view of how communicating cars will provide a safer ride and reduce accidents. Knight describes an experience where when he was riding the DTS and arrived at a blind intersection, the seats started to vibrate, he could hear a beeping and lights were flashing on the dash to indicate a car was approaching the intersection from another direction. The driver

Today cars come with many unique features that can be accessed while driving. With one touch of a hand and a look at the dashboard, the gps and other features can be accessed. In that instant the car continues to move forward, potentially causing an accident or a hard push on the break.

Driving is an important part of daily life for many seniors over the age of 60 – one that often represents their independence, and their freedom to go where they want without the assistance of someone else.

Cars have diminished the barrier of geographic separation, and because of this the structure of american society and industry is dependent on cars. Our current world would not be able to function without cars. With such an impact on society, heavy regulations were made to insure the best possible outcome for this new technology. Automobiles now exist under a complex system of laws and regulations and because of this, new advancements in respect to automobiles are closely examined with the intent to determine its safety and implications. We currently find ourselves infant of new technology that will not only advance automobiles but revolutionize them. Due to the integral role of cars in have in different aspect of

During the last 30 years, the global car market has undergone significant changes in driver experience due to technological progress (Knight, 2012). Today, a typical middle-class car comes with standard features, such as power windows, automatic gearbox and electronic stability program (Handmer, 2014; Knight, 2012). High-end automobiles can be bought with intelligent features like automatic start-stop mechanism enhanced cruise control, active lane assistance and self-parking technology (Handmer, 2014; Knight 2014).

Thesis: I believe that using electronics while driving is a dangerous action and many people are dying because of it due to the fact that their attention to driving is altered.

We conclude that we were able to successfully incorporate all the four features mentioned in this paper into our prototype model. This will be useful for mankind .Accidents that occur due to human errors can be completely avoided. It will be useful for disabled people and people who are not well versed in driving.

After assessing all of your goals and aspiration, I have identified the additional duty of Unit Safety Representative to be the most beneficial for you at this time. The position would open your eyes regarding all of the problems faced from beyond your own career field into the support and operational world. This same perspective would help to give you a good overall view of how other portions of the Air Force work. With support, maintenance and operational oversight being a part of the job you would be able to identify where small problems end up causing larger problems in the future. This insight would help with your overall goal of becoming a CMSgt. While the position comes with many new challenges, it is ultimately a self-paced position. You will be free to work and rest as you see fit

Becoming a safe vehicular user categorizes as the most important procedure of becoming a starting driver. In addition, knowing the how to of driving could potentially save a driver’s life as well will prevent disastrous situations. This essay will cover two topics; however, there remains a plethora of tasks to be pursued before and during driving. For one, a safety belt is very important when it comes to the safety of the automobilist and for comfortability. Continuing on, this paper will cover how to follow the speed limit of the specified road. For every vehicular user’s security, these rules and regulation must be specifically followed.

As new technologies develop and become mainstream over time, there needs to be specific regulations in place. It is best if these sets of regulations are developed and maintained independently from battery manufacturers, automobile manufacturers, and/or suppliers. Currently today there are many bodies that maintain these standards. A few of them include UL (Underwriters Laboratories), IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission), NEMA (National Electrical Manufacturers Association), SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers), UN (United Nations), IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), JIS (Japanese Industrial Standards or Japanese Standards Association), GB (Guo Biao or National Standard for the People’s Republic of China), US DOT FMVSS ( Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards and Regulations), and BATSO (Battery Safety Organization). These organizations set the standards to help minimize safety risks which include but are not limited to fire, explosion, and shock. These standards are in place to try and assess the safety risk associated with these new technologies and to help engineer them to be safer. This research paper will focus on the UN ECE 100 standards, FMVSS 305, and UN 38.3.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) defines aggressive driving as "the operation of a motor vehicle in a manner that endangers or is likely to endanger persons or property"—a traffic and not a criminal offense like road rage. Examples include speeding or driving too fast for conditions, improper lane changing, tailgating and improper passing. Approximately 6,800,000 crashes occur in the United States each year; a substantial number are estimated to be caused by aggressive driving. 1997 statistics compiled by NHTSA and the American Automobile Association show that almost 13,000 people have been injured or killed since 1990 in crashes caused by aggressive driving. According to a NHTSA survey, more than 60 percent of

ESC systems sense parameters such as yaw rate, steering wheel angle and lateral acceleration in order to detect differences between the intended and actual path of the vehicle. The system is then linked to the ABS and engine management system in order to differentially apply the brakes and/or reduce the engine power to individual wheels, thus generating yaw moments to correct the vehicles path. These systems are known by a variety of other proprietary names such as Vehicle Dynamic Controller (VDC) and Vehicle Stability Control (VSC) but are referred to generically as ESC in this report. Market penetration of ESC systems was estimated at 27% in Europe in 2002, and is expected to reach 50% in Europe by 2007 (Reed Electronics Research, 2003). Previous research indicates that ESC significantly reduced instability in test manoeuvres where substantial instability was encountered. It also suggests that ESC does not influence vehicle behaviour when a driver attempts to operate outside the physical limits of the vehicle. No significant disbenefits of ESC systems were found, and clear evidence of positive influence on safety and accident reduction was cited (Grover & Knight, 2005). ESC is also now “strongly recommended” to all consumers by the EuroNCAP organisation (EuroNCAP, 2005). It is suggested that ESC must work to constrain vehicle behaviour to that expected by normal human driving behaviour. It does this either by producing similar