III. Vietnam’s smoking situation as a case study
1. Smoking in Viet Nam Viet Nam is one of the countries that have the highest smoking rate in the world. In 2010, almost a half of Vietnamese men (47.4%) and 1.4% of Vietnamese female citizens were reported as smokers. From 2002 to 2010, the smoking rates had reduced (male: 56.1% to 47.4%; female: 1.8% to 1.4%). However, due to the Vietnamese population had skyrocketed during 10 years before 2010, the absolute number of Vietnamese smokers had unlikely declined from 1997 to 2010, around 15.5 million and 15.3 million, respectively. Moreover, some experts view that due to the globalization and ‘rising income’ in Viet Nam may lead to the increase of female smokers in future. More seriously, smoking also influenced to non-smokers who was suffering second-hand smoke. In 2001/2002, 63% Vietnamese families have smokers and 71% Vietnamese children under 6 year old lived in smoking environment. Tobacco use has been a leading cause of killing non-communicable in Viet Nam, such as lung cancer. According to a report in 2007, 87% of lung cancer male patients in Viet Nam were ‘current or ex-smokers’ and this number of female patients was 11%. It caused approximately 44,000 deaths in 2008 and this number was predicted to grow up to more than 50,000 in 2023. Smoking charges directly to the income of smokers and Vietnamese smokers totally paid approximately VND14,000 billion for tobacco. In addition, tobacco use also imposes a
The smoking habit is the principal cause of illness, disability and death around the world. More than five million of people in the world die due to smoking habit every year. If we don’t take care of this in 2030 the amount will be ten million. Seven million of these deaths would be in poor countries.
Smoking was highly prevalent among the men and women in the manual group in Britain in 1946 with 82% which dropped to 55% in the 1970’s and has continued to fall rapidly in the middle 1990’s (ASH, 2007). Furthermore Health and Social Care Information Centre (2013) reported that there has been a drop in the manual groups from 33% in 1998 to 26% in 2010 but this group still smoke more than the social class, in 1998 for instance, non manual group smoked 22% compared to only 15% in 2010 which demonstrates a fall in the non-manual groups and shows there is a fall in their smoking but there is an urgent need to help, promote and support the
Many drugs are used, misused, and abused in American society today. Some of these carry stigma in the general population, forcing users into an underground drug subculture. Others are accepted and almost promoted under certain circumstances. Tobacco is one of those drugs. Tobacco will be discussed in the context of cigarette smoking. This is not to undermine the existence or danger of other forms of tobacco, but instead to have an exhaustive discussion of cigarette smoking and its societal impact. Cigarettes are a means of inhaling tobacco, where it enters the lungs and is absorbed through the blood vessels, traveling to the heart, from which it is finally pumped to the brain (Hogan, Gabrielsen, Luna, and Grothaus 2003:76). Cigarettes are detrimental to society because they not only affect the user who chooses to smoke; they impact people around them through second-hand and residual smoke. The damage done by cigarettes is not impossible to address. Successful prevention measures are already in place, but this paper intends to suggest other more direct measures, especially related to statutory regulations.
For students the most direct impact of smoking is that smoking is negatively related to students’ school performance. The results of poor academic achievement dose not reduce students’ self-confidence, but also affect their future employment status. On the other hand, the opportunity cost of smoking is much expensive than other habit. Based on University of Texas’ calculation , the annual cost on smoking for pack-a-day habit is about 3720 US dollars, which includes insurance cost, health care cost and etc.. Nevertheless, the cost in Canada should be much higher because the average price for a pack of cigarette in the US is only $6 but $10 in Canada. Besides, the currency exchange rate and price index will grow up the expenses for
As the world population increases in size and age, there will also naturally be an increase in the absolute numbers of deaths. There are enormous economic consequences of NCDs due to the combined burden of health care costs and economic productivity lost including illness and premature deaths. Ethnic variations in susceptibility to disease are also concerns. For example, there is an increased risk of stroke in East Asian populations and increased risk of coronary heart disease in South Asians2. East Asia is one of the world’s largest tobacco epidemic regions3. This paper will specifically examine South Korea and how the tobacco industry contributes to the development of NCDs. The population-based policy intervention of increasing taxation of tobacco products will be reviewed.
The century-long epidemic of cigarette smoking has caused a public health concern of epic proportions. As health concerns about tobacco developed during the 1960s, the federal government moved in and initiated Tobacco Control laws. Smoking among adults in the mid-1960’s was prevalent with 42% of the population smoking compared to 18% in 2012. In 1964, the first report of the Surgeon General’s Advisory Committee on Smoking and Health identified smoking as a cause of increased mortality.
The prevalence of smoking and tobacco use by women increased from 6% in 1924, 3% in 1965, with 18% women smoking in the United States (Benson et al., 2010). smoking has increased globally but it is more prevalent among women in developed nations. This is leading to an increase of different health conditions, which were believed as male-dominated, like lung cancer, COPD, acoustic neuromas, and pituitary tumors. The need for policy measures also arises from the fact that tobacco use is a growing epidemic as first reported by the U.S. Surgeon General's Report. Smoking in women is a public health concern since is causes an annual average deaths of 178,311 in women in the U.S., and he increase in women is in contrast to a decrease in smoking by men
Smoking, in the United States has become more of a social taboo in the efforts to decrease cigarette use and prevent the negative health factors associated with it. Still today approximately 5 million deaths are caused by cancer, with the highest occurrence of death in China. China has a large majority of the world’s smokers, and there may be several underlying reasons why. The article, “China and the Toll of Smoking,” written by The Editorial Board of the New York Times embodies several concepts of cultural anthropology. The economic power tobacco companies have over the Chinese government and the globalization of tobacco companies that want to gain profits in China have led to violations of informed consent because Chinese citizens are not
"Smokers have more diseases than nonsmokers”, in other words, “nonsmokers are healthier than smokers” (Leu & Schaub, 1983). If the population of people smoking decreases, there will be a large amount of savings in healthcare costs, however, only for a short duration of time. Within 15 years of the process (of smoking population decreasing), health care prices will increase dramatically to 7% higher for men and 4% higher for women (Barendregt, Bonneux & Van Der Maas). In the meantime, the article further explained the economic consequences and showed 2 points of view regarding the idea of having cheaper health care costs for smokers.
Tobacco is the only legal drug that has ended up in the deaths of its many users. Other than the deaths, tobacco smoking is associated with an increased risk of ill health, and disability. The deaths are mostly from noncommunicable chronic diseases (e.g., lung cancer and cardiovascular disease) as well as communicable diseases such as tuberculosis. Each year, around 5 million people across the globe lose their lives due to direct tobacco smoking, most of them being premature deaths. These serious damages caused by tobacco smoking indicate that tobacco control must be given high priorities so as to improve the global public health.
In the article, “Global Effects of Smoking, of Quitting, and of Taxing Tobacco” that was published in January 2014 by Global Health, Prabhat Jha and Richard Peto talked about the effects of smoking, of quitting, and of taxing tobacco. The information that is presented is useful information for my research paper for many reasons. Prabhat Jha and Richard Peto provide a lot of good and useful information backing up their arguments with data, tables, and charts of information. The goal of this argument and article is to provide the information on the effects of long time smoking, and the prices everybody else is having to pay on the taxing of tobacco.
This paper focuses on the use of tobacco and the impact on the American society on one hand, and the Saudi Arabian society, on the other hand. Also, it is extremely important to follow the changes of the using on all types of tobacco during past years until 2010. Then the paper will have the future assuming of the numbers of smokers in the United States of America and Saudi Arabia as well as the problem solving and the recommendations.
The key aspect to be discussed is the fact that main reason for the significant decline in the number of smokers in the past decade still alludes healthcare researchers. Some better known causes however, include better insurance coverage to help smokers who quit the habit. An equally important factor is the execution of stricter laws prohibiting more smokers to smoke in public places. As identified by the CDC, the percentage of U.S adults who smoke cigarettes have has declined from 20.9% in 2005 to 16.8% in 2014. The evidence also suggests that smoking was noticeably ln 2014 than in 2013. Sources reported that tobacco is the leading cause of preventable disease and death. Another essential point is that it kills 28,000 people every year in New York and afflicts nearly 600,000 residents with serious injuries directed to their smoking. In addition, smoking kills half a million Americans every year and costs about $300 billion dollars a year. Considering this report, it can be concluded that real progress in helping American smokers quit as well as more progress is possible. According to Dr Laurent Greillier from Nord Hospital in Marseille said “nowadays, everyone knows smoking is a risk factor for developing several cancers especially lung cancer. Based on the findings of healthcare experts, it can be argued that anti-smoking campaigns get the maximum credit for the reduced number of smokers with is not entirely deserved of them.
As a nation, the United States of America has recently declared a war against the tobacco industry. There are now graphic commercials and advertisements suggesting the negative effects of tobacco cigarette use. However, according to the World Health Organization there remain over one billion tobacco smokers in the world (Rom, Corelli, Valacchi & Reznick, 2015). Tobacco use has been associated with and linked to six leading causes of death in the world which include Ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, lower respiratory infections, chronic obtrusive pulmonary disease, tuberculosis and lung cancer (The Who, 2014). The World Health organization suggests that tobacco use is one of the most preventable causes of death in the world, but unfortunately, it remains a growing problem due to marketing, promotion, and lobbyists. As a social worker, it is important to consider this as an issue that is brought up by the client. According to the CDC (2013) 17.8% of adults 18 and older are current cigarette smokers.
A joint collaborative effort of the Republic of the Philippines Department of Health (DOH) and National Statistics Office, through DOH’s100% Smoke-Free Philippines campaign backed by Philippine’s Republic Act 9211, The Tobacco Regulation Act of 2003, conducted two related important studies regarding smoking. Both researches were published last February 16, 2012 as factsheets for public references. The first study focuses on Youth/Student population and the second one was on adult. (http://www.smokefree.doh.gov.ph/index.php)