Voter Registration System Pros And Cons

In recent years, society has noticed increasingly minute numbers of voters. Regardless of what is causing people to stay home, it is a big issue. Voting is a right, every citizen is entitled to having a voice in the government. We can choose to vote or we can choose to abstain. This is not an issue, until voting numbers are so low it is hard to even call elections. To help fix this, countries have implemented a system called "Compulsory Voting", or more blatantly put as "Mandatory Voting". This system would require all citizens (capable) to vote. On paper, this seems like a good idea. However, it is a removal of right. To have a right is to have an option. We as citizens have the right to almost anything we want. The Constitution gives us options. You wouldn't say we have the right to pay taxes. We are required to pay taxes. Obligations are not considered rights. Making the right to vote mandatory would be removing one keyword. RIGHT.

At last, its 21st Century Democracy in United States, that is why nothing but a general view for mandatory voting has nothing to do with today’s politics. It’s almost signifying the central promise of American citizenship. Generally saying, let’s eat the cake for which many generation marched, fought and died. As discussed in the paper, everyone have their own problems but giving a few minutes to vote can solve this problems for future generations. Making federal voting mandatory will bring a big change in the way the candidates offer beneficial speeches. And this will make America

Since the turn of the twenty first century, in Canada voter turnout has made a significant and consecutive decline. In the last five federal elections on average only sixty-one per cent of eligible voters voted. If each eligible citizen voted in an election the government would be on par with the primary interests of the people. The easiest way to achieve this objective is by implementing a compulsory voting system. Mandatory voting systems are appealing because all citizens are affected by decisions made by the government, so it makes sense to have all those affected apart of the election process. As a result, the voting results would be more representative of the country and that would lead to an increase of stability and legitimacy.

The U.S Constitution gives the states considerable latitude in the way of conducting elections. The American citizens have many opportunities to vote. However, a turnout in American elections has dramatically decreased over the past several decades. In order to address this issue, majority of states have allowed absentee voting reforms. These convenient reforms are thought to increase the voter turnout in the elections, as well as to reduce administrative costs.

In the past decade, a total of 34 states have passed voter identification laws with the same guidelines from state to state. These laws require voters to show a proof of photo identification in order to be eligible to vote or receive a ballot at the voting polls. The initial purpose of the voter ID laws was to prevent voter fraud. However, the laws have made voting harder for some Americans, like minorities, women, students and elders by requiring a government issued photo ID.

Voter ID laws are so strongly opposed by low-income individuals, minorities, and elderly groups. These groups argue the laws target them because of the tendency of to vote democratic. These laws are trying to solve voter fraud where

An upcoming voter registration drive event held by the Supervisor of Election for Pinellas County in central Florida is catching a lot of flack by Democrat groups and the head of the Democratic party of Pinellas Country.

Last November, Missourians passed Constitutional Amendment 6 to approve photo voter ID in the State of Missouri. As of June 1, 2017, Missouri's new voter ID requirements are now in effect. For more information about the new law please join Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft for a presentation of how voter ID works in the State.

Voter Authentication is the process of validating voter identity. The fact that the voter claims to be represented by a specific cards like voter id cards which does not necessarily mean that this is true. Actual voter can be identified by using secured mechanism in the system and then be granted rights and permissions to vote. The voter must provide evidence to prove his identity to the system. It is the process of ascertaining claimed user identity by verifying voter-provided evidence.[a]

Americans do not always convey a photo ID that meets government measures. Although states have felt that it is important to make strict voter ID laws requiring voters to carry a voter ID. Voter ID laws endeavor to battle a non-existent danger of voter misrepresentation. Federal Government should invest in a form of foundation for Social Security number to confirm and make sure there’s no fraud and it is easier for voters. Every vote counts.

If accurate voter rolls aren’t incentive, then maybe cost saving is. Since regulations very state to state, it is hard to assess national cost. Considering money is a motivating factor to change, a case study for registration cost was done using Oregon as the test subject. Pew considered every level of registration. Beginning locally, it determined printing and postage, staff salaries, and facilities. Additionally, the Secretary of State incurs expenses related to maintain the voter rolls, providing and distributing registration forms, training and assisting agencies involved with voter registration, and manning the toll-free call center for public questions regarding registration. All totaled, Oregon spent almost nine million dollars registering voters for the 2008 election, that’s $4.11 per active registered voter or $7.67 per registration transaction (Pew). Compare that cost to Canada, who maintains their voter roll using automatic registration, with just 35 cents per active voter (Pew). That is a significant cost savings.

The idea of a way to vote that is easy for everyone to accopish has been long sought after, and for good reason. Voting is of large importance to our country and can directly effect our future of laws an policies. When a group, such as the elderly, dissabled, and those of minorities, are not able to vote on matters involving their own demographic due to their demographic we reate a systemic issue. Although the theory of an electronic device that caters to all disbilties in voting is pleasing, it comes with many negtive points. EVM machines may not be connected to the internet but they are still easy to hack. Thus proven in 2007 when it was discovered that a basic software could be used to transfer votes from one candidate to the other. Some

This system is time consuming and slow.It take more time to announce the result. Illegal votes are more possible in this system.

Insecurity has negatively affected the whole electoral process, including voter registration, election campaigns, actual voting process, and counting. Poor security had its effects over registration process. For example, in the southern and southeastern regions, many registration centers were closed or the process of registration was limited (Fair, 2009, p. 5). In consonance with the rapid assessment review of the USAID (2014), upon reflecting over the extent of the existential threats, “the IEC followed the recommendation from the Ministry of Interior to close more than 10 percent of 7,000 polling centers before the 2014 presidential election day” (p.

In past decade, the government has starts to discuss the system of E-voting and this modern technology. E-voting is spread in our communication platform as well as in media and many countries. In United states different types of electronic systems has been establish to cast their votes and experience it into two parliamentary elections. Germany, Russia and other countries also used internet voting at organizations, companies, homes and universities.