Vulnerable And Who Could Be Responsible For Failing The Children

Modern society now especially since 1997 have tried putting children first such as committing to meeting children’s needs. There are still problems such as school truancy, adolescents not in education or training and also child protection as there have been tragic deaths including baby P and Victoria climbie, which her death was largely responsible for the formation of every child matters inactive plus a lot of other changes in different systems,

There are ethical issues relating to children being participants in the looked after setting. Therefore, the TMA03 study carried out debates about multi breakdowns in the care system and explored the extent to which children should be regarded as valued sources in social research instead of children being positioned as vulnerable, incompetent and relatively powerless in society and this relates to how this conceptualisation of children can be used in social research, in order for them to have reliable or consistent involvement in their decision-making.

After reading the chapter, in your own words discuss the state of children in the United States. Describe in at least 2 paragraphs how can the community, social workers, advocates of the children turn the negative into positive so our children can a bright future?

Some government are not willing to provide funding to help provide better outcomes for the children’s future. The lack of available funding can have an effect on the children’s future especially children with social educational needs as due to the lack of funding can have an effect on the child as the schools, playgroup etc. will be unable to get them the one to one support that the child in order to get the best possible outcome in the setting. It also has an effect on the training that the staff can get access which will also affect the child’s development. If the child is not in the appropriate learning environment for his need will have a negative effect on the outcome for the child both sort term and long term such as weather he is in

This essay will discuss the impact of social, as well as political views that have shaped contemporary services for children. Legislations such as the Education Act of 1944, the ‘Every Child Matters’ Act introduced by labour in 2003, and also the ‘children’s act’ from 1989 are examples of services put in place to help protect and provide care for all children. In this essay there will also be talks about The Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) introduced in 2007, while also linking my points back to the pioneers whose work has contributed majorly to the influences of the modern day understanding of childhood.

There is no way to truly verify age on the internet; this is a big concern because there is a wealth of content that should not be accessed by children. Pornographic material is the most prominent, and children can very easily stumble upon these types of websites and be exposed to things that they should not be. Along with finding inappropriate materials online, children are also at a great risk because of how easy it is to communicate with people. Children every day are persuaded by online “friends” to meet them or do things for them that put them at great risk.

Children Act 2004 stated that it is not only one person’s duty to protect a vulnerable individual. It establishes better planning, commissioning, and delivery of children’s services. This act aims to improve effective local working to safeguard and promote children’s well-being. This act introduced local safeguarding children’s boards and appointed a children’s commissioner. The Children Act 1989 did not change anything, it wasn’t until the Children Act 2004 when a children’s commissioner was introduced that the delivery of children’s services started to improve. This act was brought about because of the Victoria Climbie case. There was a failure of communication between different staff and agencies and a failure to follow established procedures.

In recent years, there has been a surge in the momentum to foster inter-agency working to improve outcomes for children, young people and their families to ensure interventions are proactive rather than reactive. The failures by professionals and agencies collectively has contributed to more than one tragedy, which has placed collaborative working at the heart of safeguarding. Lord Laming’s report (2003) on the death of Victoria Climbié led to the government white paper, Every Child Matters (DfES 2004: p.12) which calls for “a whole-system change” that supports “more effective and integrated services which will secure a shift from intervention to prevention and meet the needs of the most vulnerable.”

This shows how, New laws are helping prevent, and remove children from these awful situations. The English government is preventing child abuse by putting the abusers in jail, and trying to convince people not to hold in the secrets about their abuse until it’s too late to help them. This makes it harder to have evidence, and find proof that the abuse actually did take place. Which will upset the victims because they know the truth. Child abuse is wrong, and some believe we are not doing enough to help these children in need. The English government is doing more than enough to help prevent, and take children out of these situations. According to, Report Details 16 Years Of 'Horrific Abuse' Of Children In U.K. Town… “"It is hard to describe the appalling nature of the abuse the child victims suffered. They were raped by multiple perpetrators. They were trafficked to other towns and cities in the north of England. They were abducted, beaten and intimidated," Jay said. Rotherham is a town of a quarter-million people in northern England. One question this raises is how such widespread abuse could have gone on for 16 years without local

In terms of area of social policy, child protection and safeguarding plays a critical role in justifying its importance to children and families under the New Labour government 1997 – 2010. For instance Kirton (2009) mentions how a social construction approach may be useful when considering about child abuse. The advantage of adopting this approach is that it identifies how children develop at different rates also it considers how children’s view and participation may be important in relation to any discussion about harm. Moreover the statutory guidance DFE (2015) mentions about the various types of child abuse which could take place. These are physical abuse, emotional abuse, neglect, sexual abuse and exploitation. From your views and opinion

Parental style is a very important issue in the development of a child. In fact,

Parenting is the process of raising a child. It is one of the oldest responsibilities parents have towards their children. Be a parent can be challenging and rewarding as well. Each parent uses different parenting styles. In the early 1960s, Diana Baumrind concluded that parenting styles differ in four important areas: parents ' warmth/nurturance, discipline strategy, communication skills, and expectations of maturity. She concluded that there are four types of parenting styles which are uninvolved, permissive, Authoritarian, and authoritative. Parenting styles are going to be discussed in the rest of this essay as well as their effects on the child development.

As we know, there was a prominent debate on “Nurture” versus “Nature” in the field of psychology. Psychologists fought against each other to assert their own theories and statements. Nowadays, people have reached a consensus on this topic that the environment and the genes actually interact with each other and eventually lead to the typical features of individuals. Evidently, parent is one key topic in various child development theories since parents generally provide the whole living environment for children. For example, it is one dominant component of the microsystem in Bronfenbrenner’s ecological approach.Parenting styles are referred as the general traits and characteristics of the strategies that parents used to deal with their children. There are 4 types of parenting styles which were divided by responsiveness and demandingness: authoritarian, authoritative, uninvolved and permissive. And it is not surprising that different parenting styles would likely generate divergent youth outcomes.

The importance of granting protection and other rights to children in general and vulnerable or at risk children in particular needs not to be overemphasized (Council of Australian Governments, 2012). Indeed from time to time, all people in Australia – including children – have been reminded that they have certain rights which are enshrined in the country’s supreme laws (AIHW, 2009). These rights include the right to a safe, happy, and health childhood. Unfortunately for many children in Australia, some of these rights are never or hardly enjoyed. This is especially because many children living in Australia can be said to be living under unsafe conditions (Scott & Swain, 2002). Other than safety, a significantly large number of children are known to lead unhappy and unhealthy rights (AIHW, 2011). Essentially, therefore, not all children are actually as protected as they should be. An even larger number of children are at risk of social problems such as neglect, abuse, and foster care. Others are at risk of living with vulnerable families and being deprived of important needs in life. This raises questions regarding the welfare of children and especially how children at risk are being protected. Protecting vulnerable and at risk children is extremely important given the significantly high proportion of such children among the rest of the population (Scott & Swain, 2002). It is for this very reason that this essay examines the issue of child protection and children at risk

In this paper, I will examine how parenting style affects an individuals relationship with his or her children. According to Baumrind, there are four main parenting styles, differentiated on levels of support and expectations. This paper focuses on parents with high support and high expectations,who are known as authoritative parents and those who are supportive with low expectations, who are are permissive. These four different styles of parenting lead to very different developmental outcomes for children in social, academic and emotional domains. However, this model does not fully explain parent-child interactions because it neglects to reference the environmental context of the relationship along with any personal differences in temperament of the child. This context introduces complexity such as personality differences, age of child and marital status of the parents. This is an important topic to investigate because of the impact parenting style can have on developmental outcomes for both the immediate child and for future generations.