preview

We Are Proud To Present Analysis

Decent Essays

What is the cost of knowing our past and the cost of not? In knowing our past, we have developed ineffective mechanisms to cope with human atrocities and have created stereotypes for what we deem socially appropriate. From special programs to targeted groups, legislation favors reconciling actions towards those targeted by injustice years ago, such as affirmative action on a national level or the racial reconciliation departments on a university level. However, these programs pose problems for others, specifically problems for the majority, which does not benefit from these programs. Conflicts then stem from these divisions. In We are Proud to Present…, the acting group struggles with the concept of depicting how humans can casually inflict …show more content…

The conflicts that arose stemmed from the fact that people were afraid of change and did not know any way of life other than segregation. Their belief system worked based entirely on the concept that separation worked best for a successful, happy life. People did not understand African Americans felt depreciated, criticized, hurt, and unequal, nor did they care. The complete ignorance of African Americans as functioning human beings in society led to these riots. As a result of the riots, James Meredith, along with activists, soldiers, national guardsmen, and the 1962 Ole Miss Football team suffered tremendously at the hands of the people who could not accept an African American at their university. Injuries and death occurred from their inhumane actions, which could have easily been averted had they been open and educated to change. The university’s reputation now precedes it, even today, as intolerable to minorities because of such ignorant actions. Also, the best football season in history for Ole Miss received little attention because racial differences headlined every news report. The stark inequalities, injustices, and acts of violence overshadowed the success of the year. Therefore, we deduce that the suffering inflicted by these ignorant riots is external, meaning the rioters caused others suffering …show more content…

In this case, the actors knew our past and created from that knowledge a scene that horrified each individual in attendance. Initially, the Herero genocide held much of their attention, but it soon digressed to a more unrelated topic: black oppression. Somehow, the distant genocide hit home, and the actors began depicting the lynching of former slaves in America. As a group, they used their knowledge of their past to create a conflict between themselves. Knowledge of the past caused them internal suffering because neither of them knew how to cope with the actions they took place in. In the end, nobody talks about it. Why? We have become comfortable with tiptoeing around subjects that cause discomfort, such as slavery and segregation, rather than confronting the problem directly. As the play shows, the knowledge of one event shapes the subconscious mind into a certain way of thinking. The white people knew of their history as black oppressors. The black people knew of their history as the oppressed. With this subconscious knowledge, they improvised a scary and inhumane scene that ended in a very real and shocking revelation of our actions and our ability to inflict pain. Therefore, the knowledge also causes us suffering

Get Access