What Are The Pros And Cons Of Common Core

Common Core State Standards is being heard throughout the education world. Many cringe when the words are spoken and many fight to support what the words stand for. Common Core was introduced in 2009 by state leaders. Common Core State Standards were developed to prepare children for the business world or the reality after grade school. “The Common Core is a set of high-quality academic standards in mathematics and English language arts/literacy, also known as ELA” (About the Standards, n.d.). The goals for the standards outline what students should know before leaving his or her current grade level. “The standards were created to ensure that all students graduate from high school with the skills and knowledge necessary to succeed in college, career, and life, regardless of where they live” (About the Standards, n.d.). This is an ambitious goal, but with much support can be accomplished. According to Common Core State Standards Initiative (n.d.) The Common Core has been adopted by forty-two states already and is accompanied by District of Columbia and Department of Defense Education Activity. Common Core was developed to improve the academics in society’s schools. Academics in the past years have not been successful and the United States has fallen behind international education. “One root cause has been an uneven patchwork of academic standards that vary from state to state and do not agree on what students should know and be able to do at each

Rethinking the common core standards. The common core is hailed as “the next big thing” in school reform, but is it “the next big thing? The reform was implemented to resurrect a failing school system, brought on by “No Child Left Behind” once the reform was put into action it was supposed to make some extensive improvements; however, this change brought about some unsuspected

Voices across the country are raising concerns about the new Common Core State Standards. But if you listen carefully to the conversations, the main concern is not about the standards, themselves, but about the consequences of high-stakes tests attached to the standards. And those concerns are well-founded. Trying to implement goals for deeper learning through an outdated testing model tied to a long list of punishments for children, educators, and schools is like pouring new wine into old bottles. It will certainly turn sour. The Common Core, for those of you unaware, is a set of “standards”, skills and requirements children need to understand by the end of the school year. Here 's the thing, The Common Core standards do not specify the

“Common Core State Standards Initiative” is a result of the “Standards and Accountability Movement” which began in the 1990s in the United States. This particular branch of education reforms was geared towards expectations of learning at each grade level. The Standards and Accountability Movement not only brought attention on what students were expected to learn, but on teachers as well – focusing on how teachers were to implement lessons and able to teach for student achievement which would be measured in

Over the past several decades the education levels in America have dropped below those of many of the other nations in the world. Having Common Core will give Americans an accurate description of where the U.S. school systems ranks in comparison to other nations. Additionally, it will hopefully lead to improved education. Furthermore, through Common Core teachers will be better equipped to monitor the progress of students. Through the defined standards it will become easier where students show in which subject matter students show weakness. Hopefully, this will allow teachers to provide more one on one attention to students who need it. However, one of the most beneficial parts of Common Core applies directly to students. Because of the set goals and standards of the program students will be able to better connect the material they learn and be able to see the real world application and practicality associated with their

Common Core is the curriculum most children born in the 21st century have taken. The Common Core is the most recent update in America’s school system. The Common Core State Standards, also known as CCSS, is changing the way schools teach and learn. Currently, forty six states have adapted the curriculum. The system is run by the nation 's governors through the organizations “The National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA)” and “The Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO).” It is standardized to raise the bar to fit everyone’s educational needs, which is all done through testing electronically. State tests require that all the students answer the same questions that are scored consistently. The goals for the Common Core include helping students in a way to prepare for the future, and to advance their skills and knowledge. Realistically, it has been negatively affecting students, schools, and teachers. Although the area of government that created these standards and tests have decided they are the best choices, critics have disagreed with the given standards. The Common Core State Standards are too advanced and rushed, which have led to stress in students and teachers since its inception, therefore should be repealed by all states with implementation of the CCSS.

Launched in 2009, the Common Core state standards have done nothing to help students progress their learning abilities, and have even harmed their ability to be educated. With Common Core, teachers must follow strict guidelines on what to teach and how to teach it, but this one-size-fits-all ideal does not apply to the real world. Former teacher, Susan Rakow,

Remember when you were in 5th grade? Your teacher went over the material in class, you went home and had some sort of homework paper to do, you took a test in class later that week, and you either passed or you didn 't. Do you remember comprehending any of that material? Or did you simply just memorize the material and move on with your life? The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) not only standardizes education, but it makes comprehension and intricate tool of the learning process. When it comes to American public education, the diagnosis has been offered that our schools suffer from a lack of consistent standards from coast to coast about what our kids should leave school knowing. The fix that has been adopted in a number of states in the last few years is a set of standards called the Common Core State Standards (CCSS), which have become the most contentious issue in American education in the last generation with disputes about who drew up the standards, whether they result in kids being over-tested, and even whether standards make sense that they have to be common. Are we fixing the right problem (Donvan, 2015)? Throughout the U.S., more and more states have been enacting the Common Core State Standards. Despite opposition from politicians and educators alike warning of dismal results, these standards appear to persist as a result of mostly positive outcomes.

Like an epidemic terrorizing the western hemisphere, the Common Core State Standards program has swept across our nation, and at each stop, threatened a new way of thinking and living. These standards were created to ensure that more students graduated from high school with the skills to succeed in college, life, and career, no matter where they might live (About the Standards). In 2009, this fresh new take on education was launched to each state’s educational leaders in the U. S. The state officials each decided whether the implementation of the program was beneficial for them, or if the technique they were currently using was the best option. However, even though state authorities have control of their individual educational standards,

Politics and education have been intertwined since the establishment of education and the debate is fierce and broad., Common Core State Standards can be defined as educational standards for both Math and English literature for K-12 students. Commonly Common Core has become an antipathy for many things wrong in education. Bbut the contemporary debate over Common Core State Standards CCSS has been manipulated by both America’s Libertarians left and Conservatives right political spectrum, and played out in mainstream and social media. This has never been more apparent to the public than over the past three decades., Bbeginning in 1983 with “A Nation at Risk” which is considered a significant event in modern American

In this week’s discussion board, I will be comparing the positives and negatives associated with the adoption of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for the middle school grades. The CCSSs were introduced to the public-school system recently and they have been topic for debate for teachers, parents, and students. I will start of by discussion the positives of having CCSSs in the middle school classrooms. Having a set of standards that are expected to be met by each student gives the teacher an idea of what they are expected to teach each semester. In the same scenario, these goals also allow the parents to see what their children should be learning in each grade level. If a student is struggling or risking being held back from advancing to the next grade level, the teacher and administrator can point out the standards that he or she was expected to learn and use these standards as evidence to why the student should possibly repeat a grade. Another positive of the CCSSs would be uniformity. Many students have to relocate to a different school in the middle of an academic year. If all schools have the same or similar standards, the student should be able to pick up where the left off and have an easier time adjusting to the new school. A study was recently conducted in a Kentucky school and the results were discussed in this week’s

One of the largest problems with common core is that common core is not built for states, it is built for federal standards. "Schools like to believe theses claims and efforts can trump the more political uses of the common core project, but we can't," this proves that schools know what common core is, but can't do anything about it (Rethinking Schools). Common

Imagine for a moment that you are a fifth grade student. You just came home from a drawn out day of school. After arriving at your small home in Thornville, Ohio, your parents suggest you sit down then they explain that you are moving to Chicago, Illinois. You become excited, because there will be much to see and do. While daydreaming about all the possibilities, a sudden rush of fear overcomes your body. All your dreams become squashed by the realization that you must switch schools and your new school could be more grueling. Thanks to Common Core, you no longer need to carry this fright. Common Core guarantees that all students across the United States will be learning the same material. Many advantages can be seen by the use of Common

The American education system is falling behind. According to international rankings, America ranks 17th in math, 17th in reading, and 21st in science out of 34 industrialized countries. In an effort to improve the nation’s rankings, educators have developed a curriculum called Common Core. To form the Core Standards, educators acquired standards from higher-ranking countries and incorporated them into American education. After adopting the Core Curriculum in states, educators and politicians are debating whether or not Common Core is truly benefitting students. Because these standards are on a national level, students from all socioeconomic statuses must adhere to the one curriculum, leading kids to

State and National control of schools is the solution to public education by providing a standard of measure for the complete school from all incorporated stakeholders (Loveless, 2014). A standard of measure is comprised through the adoption of common core and its criterions for the common school as a measuring tool to analyze the many issues that plague our public school systems today. Common Core is a systemic path comprised of education’s “insiders”—educators, officials, publishers-whose daily work routinely shapes curriculum (Loveless, 2014). By adopting common core, it incorporates standards derived from cognitive, research-based, content experts, as well as consenting support from federal investments for implementations and further expansions to ensure a valid curriculum for all students. With state and national control it ameliorates curriculum, instruction, assessment, and accountability, which will lead to a better common school with equal expectations and equality for all.