Standardize and document S2P processes: Through solutions like SMART by GEP, improve documentation and standardization of sourcing, contracting and payment processes to mitigate compliance and audit risks. Being in a highly regulated industry, Life Sciences organizations need to maintain flexible but controlled platforms for managing third party suppliers. Some of the aspects that should be considered: o Establish a single system to manage the life cycle of a third-party relationship including capturing spend, contracts and data exchanges. This data should be regularly updated and should be readily available for monitoring, reviews and audit requirements. Information related to locations, certifications, performance metrics etc. should …show more content…
Additionally, awareness about how the supplier under question compares with the peers is an important success factor for a fruitful relationship. You should be able to address questions like - is this supplier secure than others in their industry? Does this vendor have proven and reliable performance? How responsive is the supplier for addressing known security vulnerabilities? Use such information to better negotiate contract terms with your suppliers and set higher standards for what you expect for security performance in a third-party relationship. o Drive Performance improvement in active supply base: If you have an existing relationship with a supplier, performance benchmarking can be a helpful tool for driving supplier relationship management activities. Instead of annual or periodic contractual assessments, review of performance metrics should be continuous process. Such an approach will allow you to stay ahead of supplier issues and facilitate performance benchmarking against their industry peers. Additionally, if you have a “problem” vendor, you can more easily determine where to assign additional resources to help remediate the risks. o Communicate Performance Metrics in Business Terms: Increasingly, procurement professionals are being asked to articulate performance and business risks in terms that are better understood by business. C-Suites in life sciences companies, these
Suppliers want steady orders and prompt payment, they also want to feel valued by the company that they supply.
Performance cycles can be improved through the use of the 25 percent and 15 percent suppliers. The new suppliers would need to be reliable and punctual. Small deviations create large problems therefore, a higher premium for consistency would be well worth the extra expense in the long term.
To help mitigate the supplier risks, determine the supplier’s attitude to safety, quality, and environmental aspects to delivering components. Another treatment would be to appoint an onsite supplier liaison manager responsible for signing off on any supplier and/or design changes. It would also be helpful to have back to back contracts with sub-contractors.
When you’re choosing a supplier, you’re not just choosing a particular product, but the people who push that product as well. Issues or late shipments are inevitable, but when those things happen, you want to feel confident that you’re working with professionals that will solve things quickly.
People: The emergence of the triple bottom line has led to companies becoming more aware of how their decisions affect not only employees and customers but those within the community they operate in. To achieve this in an ever changing global world a company needs to create policies and guidelines on how to select suppliers and evaluate performance.
Blanchard (2009), “successful supplier relationships require two-way information, recommendations, metrics and incentives. Riordan Manufacturing must understand the cost and value of their entire supply chain. Without a detailed understanding of all costs, from raw materials through the end product or service, and the value provided by its supplier in the process, a supplier cannot be evaluated. Therefore, there are several things Riordan Manufacturing can do to improve their relationship with it suppliers. They can incorporate appropriate service levels and metrics into agreement, share critical information as early as possible, plan for major contingencies, expect and reward honesty and finally, make relationship meetings meaningful” (10 Strategies for Managing Suppliers).
Some of Harley's suppliers also supply key Harley competitors. How can Harley be sure these suppliers will not share competitive information with its competitors? How important is trust between suppliers and business buyers?
Centralised contract management to measure supplier performance with the costs for professional contract management staff shared across the Network
The paper could describe how ERP or CRM or supply chain functionality would be used. In the example, this could be how a business person would access this type of information.
In recent years, the importance management of supply chain has been a popular topic for a discussion and debates especially among the researchers, academician and practitioners. Still, the literature on supply chain management (SCM) especially in exploring the supply chain performance measurement is very limited. This limitation is due to the affected (in return) by many aspects of the firm’s environment and operations. The lack of investigation on understanding the supply chain measurement will affect the objectives and motivations of several supply chain concept even though there is a lot of literature on number of conceptual frameworks, discussion on characteristics, hierarchy and structure of performance measurement framework.
The effects of an AOR (action-observation-reflection) based Supplier Monitoring Program on the Quality of Strategic Supplier Performance.
One of the main reason behind this Japanese suppliers. Taking this into consideration SDT(Supplier Development teams) were developed .At first Nissan selected two engineers to undergo training activities in Japan. Based on this training, they have developed a 10 day improvement activity which started improving the suppliers by a major extent. They carry out evaluation of supplier activities at the supplier place and discuss necessary improvements and disclose the necessary action plan with senior management and take approval from them and carry on with improvement activity.
Vendor Performance analysis is the formal process of running supplier dealings, measuring performance and driving continuous improvement with a company’s strategic suppliers. This tool was developed in order to measure, analyze, and manage an organizations performance with effort to improve the relationships with suppliers, reduce cost, alleviate risk and drive continuous improvement.
When it comes to supplier management they should definitely use a performance measure to test our efficiency of their suppliers. By evaluating supplier performance, Peanutty can hope to identify suppliers with exceptional performance or developmental needs, improve supplier communication, reduce risk and manage the partnership based on an analysis of reported data. They could use total cost of ownership (TCO) as a measuring tool. It the combination of the purchase or acquisition price of a good or service and additional cost incurred before or after product or service delivery. This would be a great way to better understand cost and opportunity.
Improve Performance: Benchmarking helps to improve efficiency and quality of process and/or products. Improved process can lead to reduced production costs and in turn give maximized profits. Improved product quality can lead to increased revenue and hence increase profits. Improvement can be overall in operational efficiency as well as in product quality. Sometimes it can also be achieved in human resources through trainings and workshops for employee improvement.