I am on the affirmative side of this debate, and I believe that human experimentation is right. Human experimentation can help a lot more people than it hurts. Also, if scientists do not test vaccines (and other medicines) on humans, they will never know if that vaccine is a cure for something.
As I mentioned, human experimentation can help many people. If someone is a participant in human testing, they are contributing to scientific knowledge about the subject that the test was on. No matter what the results are, any observations or data gathered are still a contribution to science. When scientists do human tests they know what happens to a sample group of people, then they can predict what will happen to the larger population. Since people
Most individuals would be saddened knowing that animals were being harshly experimented on for human benefits. The testing of animals is deemed to be cruel and inhumane. However animal testing has saved thousands of humans lives. Some believe the sacrifice is worth the gains, but others disagree and suggest other testing methods. Ultimately, the question that arises on many different occasions, is if animals should be experimented on, or not.
Scientific studies are necessary acts to accelerate human development. These studies bring new insight to a wide variety of scientific disciplines. From our modern day transportation infrastructure, communication technology, and eradication of smallpox science does good for humanity. With much of life there is a dark side to everything and many scientific discoveries have stained our history with the blood of the victims. Especially in the medical field which has to experiment to find cures that can potentially save lives. Animal testing is a first, but eventually human testing will have to begin. There are many ethical question that doctors ask there self when interacting with their patience. History has shown that doctors are capable of unethical
Humans aren't the only species that benefit from testing. Several methods that have been developed to prevent diseases in humans have helped the lives of numerous animals (Murrary). Experimentation on animals has educated people on how to better care for animals and has also allowed humans to gain an understanding how they function. Several antibiotics, drugs
I understand that your position of allowing animal experimentation to continue is for the better of our own health. The benefits that come from animal experimentation are not so obvious but very important. It is to believe how much these animals have contributed to the finding of many life saving treatments. Some of these important treatments are: asthma inhalers, meningitis vaccines, leukemia treatments, and organ transplants. (Understandinganimalresearch.org.uk) While not resulting in a cure, animal experimentation has helped HIV
Experimental procedures allow scientists to try products on animals before we get to use them. Scientists believe that it is justifiable to ignore their interests for the greater good. It is noticeable that certain animals have been protected from being used in experiments, such as chimpanzees. Scientists acknowledge that the life of a chimpanzee is more valuable than the life of a rat. Animals from other species are used in experiments to make sure that the final product does not harm a human. We would not like to use a product that may result in health complications. However, it is important to know that animal testing isn’t completely reliable. Different species react to stimuli differently. Rats’ bodies may have structures that help to deal with certain substances, while we may lack such advantage. Thus, we may not be making a difference using animals, because at the end the product it is made for the use of humans. Human testing would bring better results, but one could tell that most mentally healthy people would not like to borrow their bodies to be used for such procedures. Also, because rats do not have a say on their life, we get to live and they get to die. It may be morally acceptable to use a rat for such procedures, since their lives are meaningless, but using humans would be debatable and
It is wrong because it uses and wastes millions of taxpayers’ dollars on the testing of vaccines and antibodies of which only a very few are ever licensed for human use, the research presents inadequate and erroneous information because animals are genetically different from humans, and the methods of conducting the research are cruel and inhumane to the estimated over 100 million animals used in research each
Human experimentation has gone on for years. People have often gotten medicines and other great medical advances but they are not ethical. Imagine being forced to test how radiation affects humans or try untested medicines than may as well kill you, in hopes that you'll live to get the cash reward, or even be an uninformed hospital patient being used to test a particular disease with no cure. There was nothing ethical about the torture some of these innocent people have endured, yet the people thought they were for the greater good of “science.” Kids were told that they were bad at speech and things like that in order to prove a point,”in the name of science.” Again, there is nothing ethical about these procedures, and there are so many reasons,
Human experimentation has been a practice for hundreds of years. Human experimentation is, “subjecting live human beings to science experiments that are sometimes cruel, sometimes painful, sometimes deadly and always a risk” (Human Medical). Humans have been test subjects for vaccines, medication, and procedure for doctors across the world. They have been used with or without their consent through various ways of testing and studies and have been taken advantage of during the entire process. Obviously, by testing humans, it is easier to see what will happen to other human patients than if scientist tested in a lab on an animal. Testing on the same species as the intended recipient is important because every animal has a different body composition
Hi, I’m Katie snow and I will be supporting why human experimentation is ethical. I’d like to start off saying that society often forgets the contribution human experimentation has had in vaccines, medical treatment, psychiatry, and the military. For example “Although Cancer has been incurable since the day of its diagnosis recent studies and acts of human experimentation we have discovered a breakthrough! In 2011 a little girl diagnosed with Cancer named Emily was given the opportunity to be one of the first patients to volunteer for human experimentation were doctors inject genetically modified HIV cells (T-cells) into the bloodstream of the child. Within weeks of Emily’s trial her cancer started going away and eventually was cured!” The example given is just one of many representations of how human experimentation is changing the world today answering questions and problems we only dreamed of solving in the future. Saddening enough these
By doing scientific research, the author states, ethical issues can arise with humans and animals being part of the experiment. The majority of society can agree on this point that Wolpert brings up. We hear about experiments going wrong whether it’s heard in the news or taught in class. Hence why we have such a big debate about animal and human experimentation along with major corporations deferring from their products being tested on animals. The consequences of such experiments can be life threatening and morally unjustified.
Human experimentation has led to a large majority of the medical knowledge and advancements that are used today. It also helps doctors to get a better understanding of the human body and create ways to prevent deadly diseases and/or cure them, but it is often argued that experimenting on humans is not only morally but ethically wrong, especially without consent.
Animal testing wates hundreds of millions of dollars and it is ineffective. Animal testing should not be allowed because animal testing has never really worked. Humans and animals have different genetics and adult stem cell research is more effective than animal testing. To start with, animal testing has never really worked. Animal tested drugs have killed, disabled, or harmed millions of people and lead to costly delays as well. One well know delay was polio vaccine which was held up for over three million decades before humans could use it. Also, 90% of medications approved for humans use after animal testing later proved ineffective or harmful to humans. Next, The only way to efficiently discover cures and create vaccines is
Human experimentation can make the world a better place. Diseases can be cured, research is beneficial to the public. I'm going to tell you why human experimentation is beneficial. It is beneficial, because it could save more lives then destroy lives.Experimenting humans can find new and more effective treatments, like a type of disease. Also by doing this you find symptoms of a disease. Another reason why human experimentation is valuable is, tests subjects get paid and they feel good for helping discover a new medication. The more people keep getting tested the more they feel like they are helping more people.Human life span can increase. It can cure worldwide diseases like Ebola. There not that much people with Ebola, so that's how human experimentation finds out treatments for it, and how to prevent some type of disease. This is why human experimentation can benefit our world.
Experiments on dogs led to the diabetes- fighting drug insulin, test on monkeys helped develop the polio vaccine, pig advance skin grafts for burn victims, and rats and mice been helpful to fight against cancer. Many researcher argue that testing on living organisms is necessary because they believe there are no laboratory alternatives that can replicate the human body. However, opponents argue that animal experimentation is cruel and inhumane, and that is unnecessary. Opponents also question the results that come from animal experimentation. They believe that animals are not reliable subjects because their bodies are not the same as humans bodies. The organs, nervous systems, and cellular makeup of animals are really different that experimentation would give inaccurate information. Animals testing is unnecessary because technology is so advanced now that a computer can help advance medical research and help cure diseases.
Those who agree with animal experimentation argue that animal experimentation must continue because of the scientific research that animals provide. Many diseases have been accurately treated with the use of animal testing. Kristina Cook, a PhD student of Chemistry/Biochemistry and Pharmacology, states in the article, “Stand Up for Science: Facts About Animal Research”, that “animal research has enabled us to find treatments for cancer, antibiotics for infections, vaccines to prevent some of the [deadliest] and debilitating viruses and surgery for injuries, illnesses and deformities” (Cook n.pg.). Many