What Is It About Theories in the Human Sciences and Natural Sciences That Makes Them Convincing

The first reason why “Theories” are beneficial to use is that “a theory can provide guidance for investigation”. This means that when we are investigating something we can look at a theory and that can direct the direction that the investigation goes. If the investigation doesn’t go the way that the theory predicts it often means that something is false (Gould & Lewis 29).

Newton 's three laws of motion play a huge role in our everyday life; from driving down the road and catching a baseball. Newton’s laws help us fully understand gravity, motion, and force in three easy-to-understand laws.

As a child, I was pressured and influenced into a Christian family, however, I believe that as a result that God is the creator of all things, He created evolution as well. I have never been educated that the Darwin’s Theory is a disgrace to a Christian’s

There are three laws of motion. Nancy Hall states that Isaac Newton worked in many areas of mathematics and physics. In 1666, when he was 23 years old, he developed the theories of gravitation (2015). Otherwise known as Newton’s first, second, and third Laws of Motion. In agreement with HyperPhysics, “Newton's First Law states that an object will remain at rest or in uniform motion in a straight line unless acted upon by an external force” (HyperPhysics). Newton’s first law can also be recognized as the Law of Inertia. Essentially, what Newton's First Law is stating that objects behave predictably. For instance, a chair is not going to move unless a force is acted upon

Some would believe that evolution is a theory that scientist made up to convince us that there is no God. To be a scientist does not necessarily mean that you cannot believe in God. Author Karl Giberson backs this by stating “…the majority of scientists are not hostile to religion and many of them are actually quite religious.” (Giberson, Say It Ain't So 359). Thus, believing that living creatures have evolved over time does not mean that you cannot also have religious beliefs. One theory does not necessarily have to be completely separate from the other.

We experience each of Sir Isaac Newton's laws everyday. In a car, pushing a car, or even in a fight. All of these laws have to do with motion. You can experience the first law in a stopping car, the second when you are a pushing a shopping cart, and the third one in the water.

Newton’s laws of motion are three physical laws that describe the connection between a body and the different forces acting upon it, as well as its motion in response to those forces. Isaac Newton developed Galileo’s ideas further and developed three law of motions. Newton’s First Law of Motion states that an object at rest with remain this way unless if it affected by a force. Also if an object that is moving will continue at the same speed as well as the same direction until an unbalanced force acts upon it. An example of unbalance force is when a scooter is being driven, the friction and air resistance is going at it, the weight of the scooter is keeping the weight on the ground, the reaction force is going up and the thrust of the scooter going forward. The force’s tendency to resist any change in motion is called an object’s inertia. Newton’s Second Law of Motion states that an object will keep on accelerating in the direction of an unbalance force acting upon it. The mass of the object and the size of the force acting depends upon the size of the acceleration., F_net=m x a, is the formula to work out the total amount of force acting upon an object. This formula can be

“Newton’s Third Law is one of the fundamental symmetry principles of the universe which states that “For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction”[1] .In simple words it means that for every action there is a reaction, which is equal to the magnitude of the force applied but opposes the direction of the action.

With his 3 laws of motion, Newton changed our understanding of the universe. The first law of motion states that an object at rest or moving will not be in motion or stop unless acted upon by an unbalanced force. This basically means that an object will stay in whichever position or continue to be in motion until an unbalanced force moves it or stops it. This law is also known as the “law of inertia” In the second law of motion, Newton states that acceleration happens when a force acts on mass. The greater the mass is on the object accelerated, the greater amount of force needed to accelerate the object. The second law shows an exact relationship between force, mass, and acceleration. This law is also expressed as a mathematical equation:

When one thinks of a theory, the normal assumption is an abstract statement that includes but is not limited to convoluted ideas, exorbitant amounts of math or calculations, and enough difficult or complicated words to fill a dictionary. Then comes the overwhelming wave of emotions following the question, “Why do I care??” Aaron James, a Harvard graduate and a Professor of Philosophy at UC Irvine, wrote a book that you may be interested in. The title of said book is Assholes* A Theory. The ideas covered in this book are all about what makes a person an asshole and the concepts surrounding the different possible types of assholes. However, the question stands, does this book present a legitimate theory?? The answer to that is no; the book Assholes* A Theory by Aaron James does not demonstrate a theory as it lacks qualities that are essential to theories.

The discovery of these laws, laid down a basic foundation for the physics of motion. Newton's three laws of gravity changed the way in which the world was perceived, because of their accuracy in describing many unexplained phenomenons.3 They explained what happens as a result of different variables, but most importantly, they explained why and how these actions happen. Like many of Isaac Newtons ideas and theories, the three laws of motion had a profound impact on the scientific community. The three laws of motions provided an explanation for almost everything in macro physics. Macro Physics is the branch of physics that deals with physical objects large enough to be observed and treated directly.4 This allowed for many new advancements in physics because the foundation had been build for others to develop upon. Isaac Newton published these findings in his revolutionary book “The Principa”. The Principa was revolutionary book because it organized the bulk of his life’s work, More importantly the

The start of all his ideas was when he was forced to return to Woolsthorpe for more than a year, “In those days I was in the prime of my life for invention and minded mathematics and philosophy more than at any time since”. Moreover, with all this inspiration flowing through Newton he came across the finding of his greatest work. The three laws of motion, Henceforth, with only one law he was capable of determining all things that went into the motion of the universe. Newton's first law; Every object continues in a state of rest or uniform motion in a straight line unless deflected by a force. Newton’s second law of motion; The rate of change of motion of an object is proportional to the force acting on it. The last Newton law acknowledges that every action must have an equal and opposing equation. In the end, Newton’s findings were a good amount of what changed people's view of the

Natural Sciences are defined as an organized systematic enterprise that gathers knowledge about the world and condenses the knowledge into testable laws’ according to Edward O. Wilson at Harvard University (6th January 1995). Unlike natural sciences, human sciences deal with human behaviour in social and cultural contexts.

Karl Popper was critical of inductive methods used in science. He argued that there is a chain of justifying arguments that could never be complete, therefore an original statement that is made can never receives the justification that it needs (Popper 505-506). He was a firm believer in the concept of falsification, emphasizing that we can never be sure that a theory is true but we can be sure that a theory is false. He continues to explain that all inductive evidence is limited: we do not observe the universe at all times and in all places. Popper identifies that no matter how many observations are made which confirm a theory there is always potential for future observations to refute the claim (Popper 426). For example, if millions of white swans were observed, using inductive reasoning, we could come up with a theory that all swans are white. However, no matter how many instances of white swans we may have observed, this information does not provide us with justification for the conclusion that all swans are white (Popper 426). Therefore induction cannot yield certainty. For scientists to continue to rely on inductive reasoning to

The scope of Natural Sciences is to create principles, theories and laws about the natural world. Natural Sciences theories and laws are based on a scientific methodology (hypothetico-deductive method ). The scientific method always tries to connect theory and observation, this is one manner to consistently organize our observation of the natural world . Experiments are often used in order to replicate aspects of the world in which we are interested. In fact, following this method before stating something to be true scientists needs first to arrange an hypothesis then make some tests in order to prove the theory and finally make up the law. Doing that we can say to acquire a proof and, therefore, good knowledge.