What Is The Rise And Fall Of Different Empires

It is evident that the two main largest classical empires were the Roman Empire and the Chinese Empire under the rule of the Han kings. These two empires had many social, political, and economic features in common, but likewise many of those features different from one another. A political feature that both classical empires shared was that both had powerful executive emperors who held absolute power. A second political feature that both empires had in common is that both empires had a central governmental body which maintained order, organized funds, collected taxes, and made executive decisions. Socially, the two empires also had features in common. The first similarity between the Roman social organization and the Han social organization

During the time in between the Middle Ages and today 's age, the once Gunpowder Empires dominated and stretched over three continents; India, Turkey, and Iran. The Gunpowder Empires consisted of The Ottoman Empire of Turkey, The Safavid Empire of Iran and The Mughal Empire of India. Each empire had some similarities as well as differences in certain parts of their evolutions and declines. All three empires were ruled in an well-organized and Islamic government with devoted officials. Their religion was dominant because for each empire it gave structure and played larger roles in their governmental systems. Because of their abilities to expand through their armies, each empire was able to exercise a dominant influence over the lands they conquered. Although they were similar in some aspects, they differed in others. Though each empires’ rise and fall there were some differences that played different roles in each empire’s history. The rise and fall of the Gunpowder Empires can be best described as an “arch” shape due to their rise through expansion and conquering, apex of power and control over vast amounts of people and lands, as well as their later decentralized governments that led to their declines.

In the distance across the land was four civilizations. These civilizations were known as the Akkadians, the Babylonians, the Assyrians and finally the Neo-Babylonians. All of the civilizations that lived in mesopotamia rose and fell like the sun.

Chau’s thesis that the rise and fall of empires was due to tolerance, inclusion, difference, and diversity is shown to be true of the Roman Empire because of the way that tolerance allowed and caused the empire to rise, enter its golden age, and fall. The Roman Empire was a “hyperpower” that lasted from 44 BCE to 476 CE. The empire contained Western, Southern, and Eastern Europe, along with North Africa; thus, there was an abundance of culture from many different conquered groups. Romans wanted to make these conquered nations provinces of Rome. The Roman Empire began (and the Roman Republic ended) with the assassination of Julius Caesar, who wanted to be a dictator. No longer a republic, the lands already ruled by Rome became part of an empire. The government became centralized with a single ruler, the emperor. However, even before the empire, during the Republic, there was also the similar feeling of wanting to conquer other nations was there.

Following the decline of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE, a new empire rose up in the ashes. This new empire, the Byzantine Empire, was a culmination of Western Roman cultures and tradition, yet, it also contains many distinctive features. Originating from the same empire, the two empires display similar cultural roots.

How did ancient empires exert their power before 600 BCE.? The way that ancient Empires exerted their power was based on their cultural differences. Empires were different in the way they exerted power because they could affect places outside their empire in a positive or negative way . Another way that empires exerted their power is by creating and enforcing laws within their empires.

Throughout time empires have risen and fallen and taken various approaches in doing so. Some of these society were warlike, while others focused on intellectual discovery. Among these various societies were great empires like the Ottoman, the Mughal, the Spanish, and the Ming. All four of these great empire ruled at overlapping times but all eventually fell for different reasons. All had strengths and weakness and can be used as a learning opportunity for an empire that came after them. From the Ming and the Ottoman you can learn strength such as religious tolerance and government structure. On the other hand, the Mughal and the Spanish teach us the dangers of over taxing and over centralizing government. In order for an empire to successfully function they must have an accepting culture, a balanced economy, and manageable size.

Its street lay out is a checkboard pattern with roads palaces and temples scatterred throughout

Rising up from a previously collapsed empire is not an easy thing to do. But in Europe and Asia two empires did just that. Han China (206 B.C.E.-220 C.E.), and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E.-476 C.E.), rose despite the odds. From the similar social classes, powerful emperors, and technology, to the different political ranks, religious balance, and forcefulness, both places were very successful. There were many similarities and differences in how they governed their prosperous empires.

With every empire that ever existed, there were highs and lows that contributed to their rise as well as their fall in power - each one somehow contributing to the rise of the next empire. Three great empires that are perfect examples of this are the Roman, Mongolian and Ottoman Empires. Regarding the rise and fall of these empires, there were differences that set them apart, however, there are several similarities that merit a thorough examination, with the Roman Empire having the greatest influence on society today.

The Roman and Han empires thrived for hundreds of years, making huge impacts on society and the way of life in classical civilizations. Both had many products to trade, had a strong bureaucracy, and created many advanced technologies that helped shape our world today. Yet some of these impacts on society played a major role in the demise of these two major empires. While the Han and Roman empires had many similarities that led to their decline, such as corrupt government officials and invasions by foreign groups, they also had key differences, such as the way the empire dealt with its immense amount of land and the level of assimilation of those they conquered.

Fall of Roman and Han Empires The Roman and Han Empires were among the best realms ever. Both decision in the main century of the Common Era, the Han administration cresting in the 200s and the Roman Empire in the 400s, these realms demonstrated extraordinary military force, strived in monetary exchange, and their regions secured limitless area. So how did these incredible realms end up plunging to a grievous breakdown? Despite the fact that there are numerous likenesses in the explanations behind the contamination of these realms, there are additionally a few differentiating purposes behind the decreases in financial exchange, impacts of the evolving populaces, and the disappointment of the political frameworks.

Ancient Rome was an empire so dominant, wealthy and economically- stable which came to a dramatic fall in the period of 250AD- 500AD. Ancient Rome faced unexplained unfortunate events which crumbled the Great Empire from the affluent empire to a impoverished society. For centuries historians have timelessly theorised and analysed many debates and research in relation to the Fall of the Roman Empire. What really caused the predominate Roman Empire to fall? Did Rome fall naturally? Was disease, such as malaria a major contributor to the Fall of the Empire, Was man -made infrastructure a problem during Ancient Roman times? Was the fall a natural event? Was the climate changing causing natural disasters? Maybe, perhaps, all the theories interweaved with each other at the same time causing a catastrophic downfall, defeating the Ancient Roman Empire. Edward Gibbon (Gibbon, 1909, pp 173-174.) quoted,

1) What enabled Europeans to carve out huge empires an ocean away from their homelands?

The Khmer Empire, a nation of great wealth and beauty. A majestic land to live in, but it wasn’t always like that. A war against the neighboring territories, Champa and Vietnam, ravaged the land and left it in ruins of what it once was. The Champa captured the capital, Angkor Wat, and the people lived in a time of fear and despair. Until Jayavarman VII, the nation’s greatest king, took back the capital and drove his enemies out of Angkor Wat. After he ended the war, he set to rebuilding his weary nation. His reign was prosperous for all in the empire, but nothing lasts forever. When their king died in 1215 CE the empire seemed to start to spiral downwards. The empire soon became a dangerous place to live and many people flead.