What makes a society feudal? To answer this I am going to look at two important ideas which Duus brings up. The first important idea that he presents is that feudalism has no definition that everyone agrees on, which has created controversy surrounding the question of Japan 's Feudalism. Duus addresses this controversy and then shows that he believes Japan did indeed have feudalism due to having many similarities with European feudalism. The second important point is that the vassal system, particularly that of military men, is a defining feature in Japan 's feudalism. He shows that the rise, and later decline, of the vassal system is crucial in holding together Japan 's feudalism. When vassals began to shift from a military focus to a more aristocratic one, the feudal system declined and eventually faded entirely. The first important idea is that there is disagreement on what feudalism is, and that despite the different interpretations of the word, Duus shows that due to Japan 's similar traits with Western Europe, he believes Japan to have gone through a Feudal period. He explains that there are two extremes for the definition of feudalism. The first extreme is that feudalism is exclusive to Western Europe, particularly northern France. The second extreme is the Marxist view that all societies go through a feudal stage as they pass from ancient society to a modern society. The middle ground opinion is that a feudal system is not exclusive to Western Europe, and is a
During the middle ages both Europe and Japan experienced feudalism. The feudal system in both social structures was very similar and different. The system of feudalism in Europe and Japan was a system that had similar roles for the nobles,and the peasants.Both cultures had warriors who defended the people of our country.They follow certain codes of honor. The feudal system has many similarities but also consisted of many differences.
The bases of feudalism is best described as a social system in Europe throughout the Middle Ages where individuals worked and battled for upper class who gave them protection and the use of the land in return for their services (Merriam-Webster). “Feudalism” is not a medieval term and not even a translation of a medieval concept (Abels 2010; Brown 2010; Bouchard 1998). In our day and time Feudalism would be difficult and baffling in several ways, but some may feel that we would benefit from it.
Feudalism in Japan and Europe are different. Although feudalism arose because both societies were in need for security and stability, feudalism in Japan arose because of civil rivalry while feudalism in Europe arose because of invasions. The systems were the same because the lords had to lessen their responsibilities and required armies to protect them. Trust was needed between lords and their
Japanese Feudalism - a social system founded upon a strict hierarchy with the daimyo at the top, followed by the samurai, then farmers and fishermen, artisans, and finally merchants and shopkeepers.
HOOK……... CHANGE UP-> The period of transition from Roman times to the Renaissance was known as the Medieval period or Middle Ages. Small, weak kingdoms--- with the exception of Charlemagne’s empire--- emerged, and life was organized around feudalism, the manorial system, and the Christian Church. Charlemagne was able spread Christianity to outer parts of his empire, but was unable to control all of his empire successfully without it falling apart. This is where the idea of feudalism was brought about.
For both Europe and Japan, feudalism was a social ranking where knights were middle ranking and would get land and pay from lords and daimyos. In exchange, the warriors had to fight and defend the lords and daimyos. As said before, the fighters were middle ranking so they were above the serf, or peasants, but below the lords and daimyos (Doc. A). Likewise, the samurai and knights would give the peasants and slaves food and shelter in exchange for labor services (OI). Here is another reason of why the knights and samurai’ similarities were greater than their
A social structure prevalent in Western Europe, in which landlords held power over large estates that serfs or laborers worked on. The landlords in return provided protection of the people working on the land.
To begin with, the Age of Feudalism is a system to protect people and live in equality. “Feudalism was a political, economic, and social system” (Doc. 1). This system starts with the king at the top who owned all land and made the laws. Next, the lord
Between the years of 500 and 1400, Europe had evolved into the Middle Ages. The Dark Ages was a period of time where barbarians killed others and burned villages. The kings and nobility granted land to the knights and serfs in exchange for crops and military service this was known as the Age of Feudalism. The Age of Faith relates to how strong the christian church was, the church was an important part of life for the people in the community.The Dark Ages, the Age of Feudalism, the Age of Faith all describe the Middle Ages between the era of 500 and 1400.
Feudalism was a contrasting system dealing with political and military relationships existing among members of the higher social class, Kings, Lords and other owners of large lands in Western Europe during the Middle Ages. The Feudal system started by the granting of fiefs, chiefly in the form of land and labor, in return the lord would receive political and
It is an axiom of human nature that as long as there is an abundance of food, there will be class and government structures. Often, the wealthy rule over the poor and the poor work for the wealthy. Feudalism is one such governing style that bows to this truth. Feudalism was born in medieval Europe and Japan and heavily influenced their cultures and traditions. Feudalism founded itself upon the idea that the wealthy nobles owned the land and gifted it to vassals, who in turn were loyal to the nobles and allowed peasants to work the land, who then intern received protection. Because both societies circumscribed to the same form of government (that is feudalism), there will be similarities in class structure; however, European and Japanese feudalism
The Japanese and European feudal systems such as hierarchies and status, although there were many similarities many differences took part over the time in the Japanese and European time line. Japanese feudalism had some key differences to European feudalism in terms of social structure. The status and power of all roles in bother European and Japanese feudalism was very important and leaving a position for a higher role was quite hard.
European feudalism was based on contract and Japanese feudalism was based on personal relationship with the lord and vassal. This helps prove that the differences between European and Japanese feudalism made limited government more likely to develop in the West because a contract limits what the lords and vassals could do. William, the king of English, said, “I command you [the vassal] to summon all those who are under your charge......and bring ready with you those five knights that you owe me[.]”1 This helps prove that European feudalism was based on contract because when you owe someone something, it implies an agreement. The key terms are I command you and owe. The vassal has to send troops because he has to. He is under the rule of
Feudalism, as a decentralized political system, flourished in Medieval Europe. In this essay, the main political and economic characteristics of Feudalism will be mentioned, while discussing the main historical factors to the rise and fall of feudalism.
In Medieval times during the 10th and 13th centuries, a form of political and social organization called feudalism was a way of life that had great effect on people of the time and on the modern world. Feudalism was developed because of the weakness of Europe and it's kings. The word feudalism comes from the word fief, which was the land held on condition of feudal service, similar to an estate (English). The fiefs bound together lords and vassals. Feudalism was a structure in which a lord divided his land into smaller parts to give to lesser lords (“Feudalism”).