What Makes Policy Stick?

Social policies are defined as actions taken by governing bodies such as schools or welfare systems that create action in society and cause implications for its members, they’re

Policy – the deliberate course of action chosen by an individual or group in order to deal with a specific problem or issue.

Deborah Stone begins her book, Policy Paradox, by stating, “a theory of policy politics must start with a simple model of political society, just as economics starts with a simple model of economic society.” Deborah Stone examines two policy-making models to describe the paradox’s of the process model for public policy. The two models include: the market (rational model) and the Polis (community) model. Stone states she contrasts these two models to “illuminate some ways the market model distorts political life.” As discussed in class, the market model follows five steps:

This paper is a review of chapter’s one (1), two (2) and three (3) in Thomas A. Birklands (2016) fourth edition regarding policy process. The reading attempts to define and show what is meant by policy process, how government, politics and the public are intertwined, problems that are associated with the policy process and how we address the problems. Current day events as well as past history are applied to the practice of policy process which assists in defining the process and highlighting its connection and importance. Thomas A. Birklands refers to the Clinton administration, the Obama administration and the George W. Bush administration, the DARE Program, World War II, and the Vietnam War, in the chapters and leads us down a path discussing

Policies are documents within the work place put together, influenced by law, by the manager. The policy will be designed around an area of practice that needs to be evidenced as being in line with law. The document gives a list of procedures for carrying out the task required,

A policy is a file or document that guides the service providers with principles on their how the

In this assignment I am going to analyse how government policies are developed, covering all aspects of the policy making process.

There are a number of ways the policy can make it on the agenda but usually the agenda is priority oriented. “Once a proposal has been added to agenda, policy adoption begins” (Jillson, n.d., p.1). The policy can be changed in various ways or adopted as is along the process. After adoption the policy is implemented by government agencies and carried out by legislative acts, rules and regulations. Lastly, there will be an evaluation of the public policy to decide whether it was successful in achieving its designed purpose (Jillson, n.d.).

Therefore he defines the word policy only, in three different ways that it is usually used. Policy used first to name when the government give some public notice on the houseless people or those who need protection and also to the undefended children from treating them in a harmful way. The second time that we come a cross the word policy is when public approved to do public assets to a program. Which involve, when the government make decision to give money on welfare and health, that process is also called policy.

I agree with your position that it is important for practitioners and service users to pay attention to policy making in human services. True to your word, Issues discussed can affect them as you cited from (McKenzie & Wharf 2010) that “personal matters such as provision of health and social services, income support, housing, and planning for the development of cities and neighbourhoods”. If given the opportunity, practitioners and service users can make useful contribution concerning areas of the policy that need improvement as well as suggesting how the think the implementation can be made, since they are directly affected by the

Tsebelis (1995) offered veto player framework to understand why public policy changes in particular political system. This framework offers more detail explanation on the public policy changes than other institutional theory, because veto player framework focuses on the actor instead of the institutions. This paper reviews three articles on welfare state’s policy change. Using the veto player framework, the three articles give the similar conclusion that in order to change the public policy, we should understand the number and position of veto points (Immergut, 1990) whether it is on the executive, legislative or electoral, so we can construct the best strategies to propose the change, the institutional design (Immergut, 1990; Huber, Rubin and Stephen, 1993) and the common belief system among the players (Kremer, 2006).

Public policy is a system of laws that the government created for the citizens in order to maintain order. Public policy should be fair for all the citizens, however, on many occasions it is hard to accommodate for all races and social classes such as lower, middle, and upper class.

When making public policy decisions, policy makers must face a world with imperfect information and a finite amount of resources. Both of these realities put limitations on how effectively a policymaker can make people’s lives better off. Obviously, it is impossible for anyone to perfectly predict how a certain policy will play out when it is enacted. This includes policymakers, who despite their noble goals of increasing the well-being of society, can only make an educated guess about the effects a policy will have. Factors such as the fickleness of human nature or hidden information creates uncertainties that are hard to address when making policy. For example, in 1929 the causes of the Great Depression were not fully understood, but

Governmental policies and politics play a critical role in the realization of change in a public agency since the policies are developed and implemented at various levels (Dukeshire & Thurlow, 2002). Since these policies may range from formal regulations and legislation to informal guidelines in an agency, understanding them is important in the achievement of change in a public agency. A Public agency basically functions based on the established policies and politics in the government. Therefore, the accomplishment of the change in a public agency requires an increased understanding of the politics and policies of government.

In spite of the policy cycle tool, it is not as easy to develop or implement new policy as there are many factors influencing it. The process of policy development involves many participants and individual stake holders. It also involves various areas which will be affected due to the new policy development and implementation. According to Hardee, Feranil, Boezwinkle and Clark (2004) policy circle involves six different stages and involves various parties who are working together for the new policy development. However, it is