This week’s analysis is about Woody Allen’s grimiest film, Deconstructing Harry (1997). It tells a story about a novelist, Harry Block, who’s played by Woody himself, who draws creativeness from people he knows in real life. He creates surreal characters that end up entering his life and that created the illusion of a dream state into reality. The film was highly inspired by his favorite idol, Ingmar Bergman’s Wild Strawberries (1957). It shares a similar premise where we see in the Swedish film where we have a professor being honored for his work. In addition, it also shares some of the aesthetics and them from the film, Stardust Memories (1980) that was also directed by Allen. Deconstructing Harry (1997) is a powerful film that deals with a theme …show more content…
This film in particular uses the editing tool to create the disconnection between the protagonist and his peers. That tool is called jump cuts in which two shots are overlapping causing the illusion of jumping forward or backward in time. Woody uses it and it plays a major role in the story as we see the author trying to escape reality but it keeps on daunting him. In terms of the character arc, Harry goes to a series of obstacles that stop him from obtaining his goals and the characters he created are the reason why. Woody plays the same persona as the majority of his films that he stars in; however, in this one, he is a character within a film in a matrix world. The film reaches its climax when Harry visits the fantasy world in which he meets the devil and discusses about what he had done in the past in a taboo comedic way. Allen was trying let us feel uncomfortable with the film, as the dialogue is a key factor because of its bad tone. The characters consistently swear and provoke bad language with some words that are highly unexpected to be said from an auteur like Woody Allen. By doing so, he makes the audience feel painful on how the story is structured with a little to no sympathy towards the main
“Analyse, evaluate and compare the techniques used to dim the horror of the real life events discussed in the novel The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas and the film Life is Beautiful.”
In this film, Harry Potter experiences the three stages of the rite of passage by Arnold Van Gennep. In the first stage, separation, the participant is identified to be symbolically departed from their old self, “the person is detached from the roles and obligations that have been associated with their lives up until that time” (Nye 2008, 146). This stage begins for Harry when Rubeus Hagrid arrives at Harry’s home and convinces Harry to attend the “Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry”. Hagrid informs Harry about his family history, and gets Harry to comply when he says “Best be off”. After Harry realizes that he has the chance to get away from his abusive lifestyle, he leaves with Hagrid to attend Hogwarts. The second stage of Gennep’s theory is liminality. In this
Bart Layton built this doc not from one perspective, but from a collection of them. Some stories, like “The Imposter” need a panoptic approach to connect the audience to the film. The themes of manipulation, identity and love are the main themes conveyed by Layton. These themes are communicated through sounds and visual imagery.
My initial reaction to the film was of utter shock at the brutally raw reality of the film. Upon reflection and commentary from other sources, the film’s simple yet vastly effective filmmaking techniques of developing the explicit and implicit meaning of the film. The explicit meaning, as
The selected piece “Hoop Dreams,” movie review by Robert Ebert is part of the review
Have you ever wanted a bad memory erased? Is love erasable? These questions are attacked head on in the wonderfully complex drama Eternal Sunshine of a Spotless Mind. After working together on the film Human Nature, director Michael Gondry and screenwriter Charlie Kaufman discussed the possibility whether or not they would have their memory erased of a bad relationship should the opportunity present itself (dvdtalk). Out of that discussion a movie idea was formulated, pitched to a studio, and a film was created showing the potential impact of doing so. Through Kaufman’s brilliant and strange storytelling, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind takes its audience on a journey challenging us to ask: what would we do
Many critics have noticed that Mulvey’s application of psychoanalysis and filmmaking appears in an ironic return to Freud and Jacques Lacan. Mulvey uses the gaze to examine male pleasure in narrative cinema, but Lacan
A treasure many modern films have poorly executed. Let us explore “The Man Who Knew Too Little”, “Rear Window” and see what appeals to human curiosity. “Rear Window” was one of the first of its kind. Hitchcock permits the audience into witnessing the lives of many
Low key lighting and odd camera angles are used in this part of the film while Harry searches for the Sorcerer’s stone and battles Voldemort. There is a slight horror aspect to the following scenes as Harry deals with the antagonist of the film, Voldemort. Horror is a genre that aims to create a sense of fear, panic, and dread for the audience. These films are often unsettling and rely on scaring the audience through a portrayal of their worst fears and nightmares. As we grow to love Harry and realize his biggest fear is the man who killed his parents and also him, and then are forced to watch him return this brings horror into the mix as a sub-genre.
The movie “Breaking Away” presents the story of a young man from working class origins who seeks to better himself by creating a persona through which he almost, but not quite, wins the girl. The rivalry between the townies and the college students sets the scene for the story of four friends who learn to accept themselves as they "break away" from childhood and from their underdog self-images.
In “A Century of Cinema”, Susan Sontag explains how cinema was cherished by those who enjoyed what cinema offered. Cinema was unlike anything else, it was entertainment that had the audience feeling apart of the film. However, as the years went by, the special feeling regarding cinema went away as those who admired cinema wanted to help expand the experience.
What attracts us to the movie theatre on Friday nights? Is it the commercials we see? Or is it all the gossip we hear from friends and TV talk shows? Well for many, it is the critiques we read and hear almost every day. One who specializes in the professional evaluation and appreciation of literary or artistic works is a critic. The profession of movie criticism is one of much diversity. Reviews range anywhere from phenomenal to average. Not only are movies created for the entertainment and sheer pleasure of the audience, they create a market of jobs and open doors to the world of financial growth. The success of these films, whether they are tremendous or atrocious, is not only dependent of the actual film, but
In service of this argument, the essay unfolds in three parts. The first section sketches an appropriate framework for understanding how cinema marshals and moves viewers by engaging them in a fully embodied experience.4 The second section offers a brief overview of the film's plot before turning to an analysis of its triptych narrative and affective development. The third and final section considers the methodological, critical, and theoretical implications suggested by the preceding analysis.
In 1966, Woody Allen made his theatrical film debut with the quirky, What’s Up, Tiger Lily?. Woody Allen was the head writer as well as one of the directors; Senkichi Taniguchi being his partner. The two directors took the Japanese action film “International Secret Police: Key of Keys” and changed the plot to focus on a secret egg salad recipe instead (“What’s Up, Tiger Lily?”). They did this by re-dubbing the dialogue as well as rearranging some of the scenes. Experimental concept of the film alone, Woody Allen managed to already set himself apart from other filmmakers. However, it is in the execution of the concept that Woody Allen was able to establish his unique presence in the world of popular culture.
When it comes to movies, many directors are good at their jobs. However, other directors are great in the art of film making. There is no doubt such statement is considered utterly subjective, but what would life be without subjectivity, for it is our differences that make us thrive against a monotonic existence. By the same token, Alfred Hitchcock and Christopher Nolan utilize their singularities to create films that for decades have impacted the movie making universe. In fact, it is their differences that provide us with a high contrast to compare and scrutinize their job and find what made them great at it.