2.) I think that ethos is the most important rhetorical proof to have for a persuasive speech. If you don’t have ethos or “credibility of the speaker”(Ethos, Pathos, Logos: 3 Pillars of Public Speaking) then how will your audience be persuaded if they can’t believe you or know that you are credible.
While all of the rhetorical proofs would be good to have in any persuasive speech ethos would be a game changer if you didn’t have it. Right off the bat no one would believe you and your audience you stop listening to your speech if you didn’t establish credibility during the first part of your speech.
Ethos, Pathos, Logos: 3 Pillars of Public Speaking. (n.d.). Retrieved July 30, 2016, from http://sixminutes.dlugan.com/ethos-pathos-logos/
This website explains the rhetorical proofs meanings. This website also explains the background and history of the three rhetorical proofs.
…show more content…
3.) “A false analogy is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone applies facts from one situation to another situation but the situations are substantially different and the same conclusions cannot logically be drawn”(false analogy). So, if you are talking about two events and their properties don’t align then you have a false analogy.
If we have false analogies it is harder for the audience to understand what you are talking about or it might make the audience ignore parts of your speech. It is easy to have a false analogy because you might not even realize you have one because “real-world parallels are always limited; the differences between things can often overpower their similarities”(false analogy).
False analogy. (n.d.). Retrieved July 30,
Metaphors are used to present hidden similarities between two concepts to help understand a more distinct description of a setting, conflict and other entities in a story. “Rainsford stood blinking in the river of flaring gold light” (64). The metaphor “… the river of flaring gold light” implies that the river is reflecting a glow, like a flare of gold light. The quote helps present part of the setting and helps the reader imagine a
Metaphors and similes are comparing two unlike objects, and should have nothing to do with the action of a living thing.
The first chapter introduced the reader to the art of rhetoric. He describes how rhetoric works through real life examples. He demonstrates ways that rhetoric persuades us like, argument from strength, and seduction. He tells the reader that the sole purpose of arguing is to persuade the audience. He showed that the chief purpose of arguing is to also achieve consensus, a shared faith in a choice.
a metaphor, which is the comparison of two things by just stating that one thing is the other.
Of the three modes of persuasion, ethos, encompasses a person’s credibility. Their credibility is defined by how often then speak truths, if they have good sense, are a morally upstanding person, and their overall goodwill. Sarah Knight is a Cum Laude Harvard English Literature graduate. Simply knowing this can give a positive impression to an audience even before. she has come on stage. She is educated, well spoken, and well versed. The listener could interpret her education and intelligence as a boost to her credibility.
This example describes Mr. Wiesel’s bodily reaction to the officer’s blows, comparing it to a tree struck by lightning. Using “like”. ~ Simile Examples/evidence: “I was putting one foot in front of the other, like a machine. I was dragging this emancipated body that was still such a weight.” Page 85 Effect/purpose:
The following statement is an example of reasoning from analogy: “The United Nations charter establishes the right of all people to live free of political oppression. The government of North Korea subjects its people to political oppression. Therefore, the government of North Korea is violating the U.N. charter.”
A simile is a figure of speech that compares one thing to another using the words like or as. The machines cut the trees in one big swipe like a shearer quickly cutting the fleece off a
Device: Simile–A word or expression that makes an explicit comparison between two things of unlike nature that yet have something in common. Similes usually use the terms “like” or “as” in making that explicit comparison.
As first stated by the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle, the art of rhetoric in persuasive speaking is based upon the usage of the three key components, logos, ethos and pathos. Logos representing the usage of logic and reasoning within the speech or text, ethos representing the writer or speaker’s credibility and pathos representing how the speaker or author establishes an emotional connection with the audience. In former president Bill Clinton’s 2012 democratic national convention he relies heavily upon Aristotle’s persuasive speaking techniques to help convince the participants of the convention and those watching at home to reelect the nominee of the Democratic Party, current
Analogies/Metaphors: When you can relate your scenario to something that the prospect already accepts as true.
One of the key factors in crafting a persuasive piece of rhetoric is tailoring your message to the specific audience. This information will help you decide what sorts of facts to incorporate into your rhetoric as well as help you determine which means of persuasion would be the most effective to employ. Your evidence. When planning your speech or writing, collect any and every type of evidence you can find. Evidence could be facts, statistics, laws, and individual testimonies. It’s always good to have a nice blend, but remember different audiences are persuaded by different types of evidence. Some people need cold, hard facts and statistics in order to be persuaded. Others find the testimony of peers or a reputable authority to be more convincing. Part of getting to know your audience is figuring out what kinds of evidence they will find most credible and compelling
Gerard A. Hauser covers a plethora of details on how to create a well-made persuasive argument in his book, an Introduction to Rhetorical Theory; however, he covered three specific essentials that are necessary for persuasion: the components logos, pathos and ethos; purposive discourse and rhetorical competence; identification. I will argue for each constituent, respectively, to prove that persuasion cannot thrive without the aforementioned essentials.
Metaphor: a word or phrase for one thing that is used to refer to another thing in order to show or suggest that they are similar.
Simile is a phrase that uses the words like or as to describe someone or something by comparing it with someone or something else that is similar. Simile and metaphor genuinely have an identical definition. Both of them compare two things that absolutely different. Simile is the explicit comparison of two things,