symbolic interactionism

1449 Words Nov 27th, 2013 6 Pages
Essay Exam #3

Symbolic interactionism is a sociological viewpoint that has shaped various matters of the practice as we know it today. Social interactionism particular focus is based on how individuals learn to interpret and also gives meaning to the world through interaction with others. The term “symbolic interactionism” is remotely used to distinguish the study of human life and conduct. It has been argued by sociologist that this has a micro approach and doesn’t stipulate any macro substance or in other words this philosophy concentrates more on the individual than society as a whole which raised controversy over time. This practice has been heavily influenced by George Herbert Mead George H. Mead, American philosopher and
…show more content…
Max Weber, a German sociologist, philosopher, and political economist also argued for the study of social action through interpretive means built on comprehending the principle and value that individuals attach their own actions he stressed, like Mead, the importance of meaning and action and how sociologist should study not just the objective aspects of society but address the actual meaning of the behavior. Lastly Emile Durkheim, a French sociologist, psychologist, and philosopher; who established the theoretical practice, major concern was with how societies could maintain their integrity and coherence in modernism. Durkheim goes on to scrutinize the pragmatist zeal for individual experience. He miscues the Pragmatists as inadequate to acknowledge the falsehood that exists between the understanding, which results from secluded experiences and that which proceeds from collective experiences.
In conclusion, symbolic interactionism can oblige as a theoretical viewpoint for conceptually noticeable and deeply resolved multiple methods research that has expanded the understanding of human behavior. Man’s behavior, within his social group, gives him opportunity to become an object of himself, which expedites the advancement, resulting in evolutionary development than the lower beings. Also the unification of mind is not parallel to the oneness of self, for self’s unity is established by the full affiliated motive of social behavior and experience in which
Open Document