though its capital cost is very expensive, but it lowers the social cost. The thermal power plants accelerate the climate change and pollute the atmosphere. It generates direct and indirect damages such as smog, acid rain, and natural hazards. Historically, London experienced deadly smog, and recently Chinese mega cities are experiencing the smog and haze. It creates the many mental and physical health problems, which means that the government’s budget leak to the public health insurance. Extreme natural hazard occurs more frequently by climate change. Massive ice storms, floods, hurricane, and abnormal high or low temperature are good examples of climate change phenomenon. Countries are facing these disaster at least a year. The direct …show more content…
The nuclear power objectors call nuclear waste into questions, and the nuclear defenders argue that it is not a big thing. They argue that the technologies are developing, and through reprocessing technology 97% of raw materials could be recycled to produce more electricity. Left over three percents can be safely stored. If a typical French family spends nuclear energy in their entire life, then the nuclear waste is only size of golf ball. This is possible, because one gram of Uranium could produce the amount of electricity as one tone of fossil fuel, and also future technology may reduce more nuclear waste or eliminate them all (Comby, 2010). There are many reasons to use the nuclear power if the nuclear defenders’ arguments are reasonable and true, however, the nuclear power objectors against every single argument. First, the nuclear power defenders cover the nuclear power up as only clean energy for replacing the thermal power, however, it has many flaws and defenders arguments are controversial. The nuclear power is not only green house gas free option. There are many reusable energy powers can replace thermal and nuclear power. There are so many alternative energies such as solar, wind, biofuel, geothermal, and hydro electric. Also, these have some limitation to commercialize; however, those have potential to be used as main source of electricity generator. If the technologies develop in the future, then those
Nuclear waste is a radioactive waste that is dangerous, and a fair percentage of people would agree on this topic. However, is it really dangerous or is it just harmful to an extent? In society, many debates are held over trying to prove to the world that this substance is harmful. In the essay, “Nuclear Waste,” Muller states clearly that he sides with the anti-nuke of the debate and how he pinpoints the facts of nuclear waste with great persuasion. Yet, it is uncertain whether Muller clearly has a good argument and/or answers the questions that many people linger to know.
• Waste from nuclear energy stays radioactive for thousands of years. Great care has to be taken in storing this waste safely.
The first advantage of nuclear energy is that it is one of the cleanest sources of energy available to us now. The process of fission doesn’t emit any greenhouse gases or emissions that are linked to global warming. Nuclear energy is currently the largest clean air energy source. It currently occupies 63.3 percent of the emission free electricity in the United States, and this must continue to get expanded upon. With increased use of nuclear energy comes a decreased use in fossil fuels, which would result in a lower carbon footprint for the U.S. This would help slow down the impact of global warming and climate change.
Although the first nuclear weapons were relatively small, with yields equivalent to approximately 20,000 tons of dynamite, they nonetheless shocked the world, setting off an arms and energy race that would last for decades. Today, the United States sits on top of the world’s largest nuclear arsenal. Nuclear powered submarines and aircraft carriers dominate the oceans, and over 100 nuclear power plants supply nearly 20% of the nation’s power supply (Bayh & Gregg, 2014). All of this nuclear production produced tremendous amounts of nuclear waste.
The advantage of of Nuclear Power is that it doesn’t depend on fossil fuels and is not affected by the erratic oil and gas prices. Coal and natural gas in other power plants emit carbon dioxide, whereas nuclear power plants emit minimal carbon dioxide. Nuclear fission produces a million times more energy per unit weight than fossil fuel alternatives.
The author of The Cheap but Costly Alternative - Nuclear Power emphasizes the dangers of nuclear energy by informing you of all the disasters that can happen and have happened. The author also uses loaded language to create an emotional appeal on how people could get hurt so that the reader won't support nuclear energy. Wind or solar energy could be good alternatives to nuclear energy. These sources of energy are natural and clean considering they'd come right from the weather and
In my opinion i think we in the United States should use Nuclear power plants.There is so many safeties and good benefits and so many more positive things that can come the Nuclear power plants. About Thirteen percent of the world's electricity comes from Nuclear power plants that emit little to no greenhouse gases. In the United States saves twelve billion dollars each year for energy costs. These Nuclear power plants actually emit fewer radioactive materials into the environment than a traditional coal burning plants. The main benefit of Nuclear power plants are that it is more efficient than burning fossil fuels as the amount of energy released from uranium per gram is much more than the fuels such as oil or coal approximately eight
In a world with an ever growing need for more power, and an ever growing threat of global warming, the coal power stations are not going to sufficiently meet our needs as a country. Nuclear energy is clean, safer than ever before, cheaper, & the only feasible way to generate electricity. Also with the possibility of nuclear reactors to convert the waste product of normal reactors into more energy, nuclear energy is the clear choice. Once the public stops being misled by the government and the media about nuclear power, we will put our uranium deposits into use for
Nuclear energy is the energy released by a nuclear reaction, it uses fuel made from mined and processed uranium to generate heat and electricity. It is the world’s largest emission free energy source. Nuclear energy also has the lowest impact on the environment than other energy sources. But it can still be very harmful because of the radiation is causes and the radioactive waste it produces. Radioactive wastes are the ruins of nuclear materials that are used in providing nuclear energy. These wastes contain high levels of radiation that can be very hazardous to humans and the environment. Some people accept and support the idea of using nuclear energy and others don’t. In the following paragraphs, some major nuclear accidents and the public acceptance of nuclear energy will be discussed.
If everybody changed their mind soon enough everybody will be wanting nuclear power plants. Another good thing that comes out of nuclear energy is it would cost 2.10 cents per kilowatt and petroleum was 21.56 cents. Scientist have figured out what is causing global warming and that is greenhouse gasses. A great number of people think that nuclear energy contributes to a number of greenhouse gasses. Those people are wrong because nuclear energy only let's a fraction of what oil or coal does. Situations can happen with any sort of energy making machine, but luckily nuclear has the best security out of all of them. Over the past years, they have added plan after plan for emergencies and procedures.
Nuclear power is our most dominate way of energy. It is also a more environmentally friendly way of producing energy. Many people have this argument over whether nuclear power is bad or good. Whether it is harming society or helping it. Nuclear power is a more efficient, safer and better way of producing energy.
As each year passes, more and more electricity will be made as a result of increased nuclear power plants around the world. The economic benefits of nuclear energy are equally advantageous as the environmental aspects.
The world's natural resources are being consumed at an alarming rate. As these resources diminish, people will be seeking alternative sources by which to generate electricity for heat and light. The only practical short-term solution for the energy/pollution crisis should be nuclear power because it is available, cleaner and safer.
One of the pros of Nuclear power is that, if we use Nuclear Power then we will use Fossil Fuels a lot less than we normally use them, and this would help stop the greenhouse gases from going into the air. (CO2 and others.) Also, another good thing about Nuclear power is that it is low operation costs, nuclear power produces very inexpensive electricity. Also, even though the expense of setting up nuclear power plants is moderately high, the expense of running them is quite low. These Nuclear plants can be shut down if other resources are to be very high and when they are not in high demand then the Nuclear plant can be up and running again. But then again, Nuclear power gives us new ways to defend ourselves for wars for the future since we have used it in the past. However, the normal life of nuclear reactor is anywhere from 40-60 years, depending on how often it is used and how it is being used. Even if we run out of Nuclear power then we might be able to still use the fission reaction to make more reliable resources in the
The use of nuclear energy is a big topic for debate. Many countries have fully embraced it while others, such as the U. S., haven’t. Nuclear energy is feared for its danger and scorned because of its wastes. On the other hand, nuclear energy does have some pros like cheaper cost of energy and environmentally safe. Reactor breeders show great promise in nuclear waste, but are it enough to convince the nation?