1) Suppose the job separation rate (s) of an economy is 0.01 and the job findings rate (f) is 0.2. The long run unemployment rate (u) is then 4.7%. Suppose the government is implementing a new law that helps unemployed people find jobs sooner. Which of the following is the most likely outcome? a) s increases and u decreases b) s decreases and u increases c) fincreases and u increases d) f increases and u decreases

1) Suppose the job separation rate (s) of an economy is 0.01 and the job findings rate (f) is 0.2. The long run unemployment rate (u) is then 4.7%. Suppose the government is implementing a new law that helps unemployed people find jobs sooner. Which of the following is the most likely outcome? a) s increases and u decreases b) s decreases and u increases c) fincreases and u increases d) f increases and u decreases

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter18: Introduction To Macroeconomics: Unemployment, Inflation, And Economic Fluctuations

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 7P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Unemployment rates have been higher in many European countries in recent decades than in the United States. Is the main reason for this long-term difference in unemployment rates more likely to be cyclical unemployment or the natural rate of unemployment? Explain briefly.
While unemployment is highly negatively correlated with the level of economic activity, in the real world it responds with a lag. In other wands, firms do not immediately lay off workers in response to a sales decline. They wait a while before responding. Similarly, firms do not immediately hire workers when sales pick up. What do you think accounts for the lag in response time?
The U.S. unemployment rate increased from 4.6 in July 2001 to 5.9 by June 2002. Without studying the subject in any detail, would you expect that a change of this kind is more likely to be due to cyclical unemployment or a change in the natural rate of unemployment? My?
What happens to the labor force participation rate when employed individuals are reclassified as unemployed? What happens when they are reclassified as discouraged workers?
What forces create the natural rate of unemployment for an economy?
Over the long term, has the U.S. unemployment rate generally trended up, trended down, or remained at basically the same level?
What is frictional unemployment? Give examples of frictional unemployment.
Using the above data, what is the unemployment rate? These data are U.S. statistics from 2010. How does it compare to the February 2015 unemployment rate computed earlier?