1. A batch of n resistors have an average of 101.5 Ohms. Assuming a population sample variance of 25. We are interested to see whether the population mean is 100 Ohms at a level of significant 0.05 (meaning that our criterion for drawing conclusion from p-value is based on 0.05). The hypothesis testing is as follows a) Ho: µ = 100 versus H1:µ # 100. For n = 100, compute the p-value and draw a conclusion for our test. b) Ho:µ 2 100 versus H,: µ < 100. For n 100, compute the p-value and draw a conclusion for our test. c) Ho: H = 100 versus H1:µ # 100. For n = 10, compute the p-value and draw a conclusion for our test.

1. A batch of n resistors have an average of 101.5 Ohms. Assuming a population sample variance of 25. We are interested to see whether the population mean is 100 Ohms at a level of significant 0.05 (meaning that our criterion for drawing conclusion from p-value is based on 0.05). The hypothesis testing is as follows a) Ho: µ = 100 versus H1:µ # 100. For n = 100, compute the p-value and draw a conclusion for our test. b) Ho:µ 2 100 versus H,: µ < 100. For n 100, compute the p-value and draw a conclusion for our test. c) Ho: H = 100 versus H1:µ # 100. For n = 10, compute the p-value and draw a conclusion for our test.

A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)

10th Edition

ISBN:9780134753119

Author:Sheldon Ross

Publisher:Sheldon Ross

Chapter1: Combinatorial Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1.1P: a. How many different 7-place license plates are possible if the first 2 places are for letters and...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The desired percentage of SiO2 in a certain type of aluminous cement is 5.5. To test whether the true average percentage is 5.5 for a particular production facility, 16 independently obtained samples are analyzed. Suppose that the percentage of SiO2 in a sample is normally distributed with ? = 0.32 and that x = 5.21. (Use ? = 0.05.) (a) Does this indicate conclusively that the true average percentage differs from 5.5?State the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses. H0: ? = 5.5Ha: ? ≠ 5.5H0: ? = 5.5Ha: ? ≥ 5.5 H0: ? = 5.5Ha: ? < 5.5H0: ? = 5.5Ha: ? > 5.5 Calculate the test statistic and determine the P-value. (Round your test statistic to two decimal places and your P-value to four decimal places.) z = P-value = State the conclusion in the problem context. Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the true average percentage differs from the desired percentage.Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence…
Suppose a linear model y=β0+β1xy=β0+β1x is fit to a sample data set, and a test of the null hypothesis H0:β1=0H0:β1=0 against an alternative hypothesis HA:β1≠0HA:β1≠0 is performed; a PP-value of 0.4203 is obtained. Which of the following scatter plots depicts the data set on which this model was fit and the hypothesis test was performed?
A sample of 12 radon detectors of a certain type was selected, and each was exposed to 100 pCi/L of radon. The resulting readings were as follows: 105.6 90.9 91.2 96.9 96.5 91.3 100.1 105.5 99.6 107.7 103.3 92.4 Does this data suggest that the population mean reading under these conditions differ from 100? State the null and alternative hypotheses. Calculate, correct to 2 decimal places, the sample mean, x ; and the sample standard deviation, s. Evaluate the appropriate test statistic. Test these hypotheses at 05 level of significance.
.A sample of 9 measurements, randomly selected from a normally distributed population, resulted in x= 2.6, and s= 0.9 Conduct a hypothesis test to verify the claim that the population mean is greater than 2.5 . Use a=.05
In a test of H0: p = .43 versus Ha: p ≠ .43, a sample of size 1500 leads to a p-value of 0.087. Which of the following must be true if a = 0.05? A. The Ho should be rejected at the 5% level B. The Ho should fail to be rejected at the 5% level C. The Ho should be accepted at the 5% level
A sample of 12 radon detectors of a certain type was selected, and each was exposed to 100 pCi/L of radon. The resulting readings were as follows: 104.3 89.6 89.9 95.6 95.2 90.0 98.8 103.7 98.3 106.4 102.0 91.1 a)Does this data suggest that the population mean reading under these conditions differs from 100? State and test the appropriate hypotheses using =.05. b) Suppose that prior to the experiment, a value of teta=7.5 had been assumed. How many determinations would then have been appropriate to obtain beta=.10 for the alternative u=95 ?
37// An expert estimates that the distribution parameter for durability times of parts produced with machine A in the factory is different from the distribution parameter for durability times of parts produced with machine B. Durability times of 7 parts produced from machine A and 7 parts produced from machine B are given below. Accordingly, find the Mann Whitney U critical table value required to test the expert's claim at a = 0.05 significance level. a) 12 B) 14 NS) 16 D) 18 TO) 21
A sample of 12 radon detectors of a certain type was selected, and each was exposed to 100 pCi/L of radon. The resulting readings were as follows: 105.6 90.9 91.2 96.9 96.5 91.3 100.1 105.5 99.6 107.7 103.3 92.4 Does this data suggest that the population mean reading under these conditions differ from 100? (a) State the null and alternative hypotheses. (b) Calculate, correct to 2 decimal places, (i) the sample mean, x ; and (ii) the sample standard deviation, s. (c) Evaluate the appropriate test statistic. (d) Test these hypotheses at   0.05 level of significance.
Dr. Romanoff reported the following in a journal: “F (5, 106) = 10.09, p = .04.” Should Dr. Romanoff state that there are significant differences among the variable means at a .05 alpha level?
Q2C. Considering the following MA(3) process: y_t = u_t − 0.7u_(t-1) − 0.2u_(t-2) + 0.4u_(t-3) Where u_t is a white noise process with variance equal to 1. What is the value epsilon_k = cov(y_t,y_(t-k)) for k = 0? Provide the correct answer along with the working steps and underlying assumptions used to calculate the value of epsilon_k = cov(y_t,y_(t-k)) for k = 0.
Assume we wanted to show that the true proportion of virginica iris seeds that fail to germinate is less than 20%. Let's say we tested at an alpha of 0.05, and found a p-vale of 0.082. Which of the following would be an appropriate conclusion and interpretation? A) With an alpha of 0.05, and a p-value of 0.082, we fail to reject the null and state we have insufficient evidence to support that the true proportion of virginica iris seeds that fail to germinate is less than 20%. B) With an alpha of 0.05, and a p-value of 0.0082, we reject the null and state we have sufficient evidence to support that the true proportion of virginica iris seeds that fail to germinate is less than 20%. C) With an alpha of 0.05, and a p-value of 0.082, we reject the null and state we have sufficient evidence to support that the true proportion of virginica iris seeds that fail to germinate is less than 20%. D) With an alpha of 0.05, and a p-value of 0.082, we fail to reject the null and state…
Dr. Stevenson reported the following in a journal: “F (4, 106) = 10.09, p = .04.” Should Dr. Stevenson state that there are significant differences among the variable means at a .01 alpha level?