2) Two firms, A and B, are each considering developing a new iPhone app. Whichever firm is the first to develop the app wins a patent worth $20 million. Developing a new app requires several development steps. The firms alternate moves, with A going first, until someone wins the patent. All moves can be seen by the other firm. In each turn, the firm can choose to take 0, 1 or 2 steps. Taking 0 steps costs the firm nothing. Taking 1 step a turn costs the firm $4 million. Taking 2 steps in a turn costs the firm $11 million. Initially each firm is 4 steps away from completing development. Describe and explain what happens in the patent race.

2) Two firms, A and B, are each considering developing a new iPhone app. Whichever firm is the first to develop the app wins a patent worth $20 million. Developing a new app requires several development steps. The firms alternate moves, with A going first, until someone wins the patent. All moves can be seen by the other firm. In each turn, the firm can choose to take 0, 1 or 2 steps. Taking 0 steps costs the firm nothing. Taking 1 step a turn costs the firm $4 million. Taking 2 steps in a turn costs the firm $11 million. Initially each firm is 4 steps away from completing development. Describe and explain what happens in the patent race.

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305585126

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter17: Oligopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5CQQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Does each individual in a prisoners dilemma benefit more from cooperation or from pursuing self-interest? Explain briefly.
Consider trade relations between the United States and Mexico. Assume that the leaders of the two countries believe the payoffs to alternative trade policies are shown in the image attached. a) What is the dominant strategy for the United States? For Mexico? Explain. b) Define Nash equilibrium. What is the Nash equilibrium for trade policy? c) In 1993, the U.S. Congress ratified the North American Free Trade Agreement, in which the United States and Mexico agreed to reduce trade barriers simultaneously. Do the perceived payoffs shown here justify this approach to trade policy? Explain.
12.3 Armed Conflict: Consider the following strategic situation: Two rival armies plan to seize a disputed territory. Each army's general can choose either to attack (A) or to not attack (N). In addition, each army is either strong (S) or weak (W) with equal probability, and the realizations for each army are independent. Furthermore the type of each army is known only to that army's general. An army can capture the territory if either (i) it attacks and its rival does not or (ii) it and its rival attack, but it is strong and the rival is weak. If both attack and are of equal strength then neither captures the territory. As for payoffs, the territory is worth m if captured and each army has a cost of fighting equal to s if it is strong and w if it is weak, where s <w. If an army attacks but its rival does not, no costs are borne by either side. Identify all 12.7 Exercises • 267 the pure-strategy Bayesian Nash equilibria of this game for the following two cases, and briefly describe…
Mary and Raj are the only two growers whoprovide organically grown corn to a local grocery store.They know that if they cooperated and produced lesscorn, they could raise the price of the corn. If theywork independently, they will each earn $100. If theydecide to work together and both lower their output,they can each earn $150. If one person lowers outputand the other does not, the person who lowers outputwill earn $0 and the other person will capture the entiremarket and will earn $200. Table 10.6 represents thechoices available to Mary and Raj. What is the bestchoice for Raj if he is sure that Mary will cooperate? IfMary thinks Raj will cheat, what should Mary do andwhy? What is the prisoner’s dilemma result? What is thepreferred choice if they could ensure cooperation? A =Work independently; B = Cooperate and Lower Output.(Each results entry lists Raj’s earnings first, and Mary'searnings second.)
(1) Patricia owns a cleaning business with Sarah. They both have other jobs and are trying to determine the number of hours to work at the cleaning business. The following payoff matrix shows their daily incomes depending on the number of hours they work at the cleaning business. If Patricia chooses to work full time and Sarah works part time, what will each earn in daily income? A-Patricia will earn $60; Sarah will earn $60. B-Patricia will earn $50; Sarah will earn $80. C-Patricia will earn $80; Sarah will earn $50. D-Patricia will earn $55; Sarah will earn $55. E-Indeterminate (2) Company A and Company B are each telecommunications manufacturers. Both companies manufacture the same products, and they make their decisions based on the other's actions. Both companies are considering opening retail outlets to increase their profits. The payoff matrix shows the profits of the companies in millions of dollars if they choose to open retail outlets. The government imposes a new $5…
Dr. Heinz Doofenshmirtz and Perry the Platipus have decided to venture into farming. They both participated in the venture eqully well, so at the end of the year, their farm produced five geese, each laying golden egs. Perry and Dr. Doof have to decide how to divide these five geese among themselves -- there are no market where they could sell them and there is not sharing or time-share arrangements possible. In other words, either they use the goose or loose it. Evidently, they cannot split an egg-laying goose in half.(a) Give an example of economically efficient allocation of golden egg laying geese between Perry and Dr. Doof. Briefly explain why the allocation you provide is efficient. (b) Give an example of an allocation of geese between the two that you think is fair (equitable). Briefly explain why it is fair in your opinion. (c) If the allocation in (a) is not the same as the one in (b), is it possible to come up with an allocation of geese that would be both efficient and…
1) What are the Nash equilibria? Which one is unreasonable/non-credible threat? 2) What are the subgame perfect Nash equilibria? Does SPNE concept eliminate the unreasonable Nash equilibrium?
Consider trade relations between the United States and Mexico. Assume that the leaders of the two countries believe the payoffs to alternative trade policies are as follows a. What is the dominant strategy for the United States? For Mexico? Explain. b. Define Nash equilibrium. What is the Nash equilibrium for trade policy? c. In 1993, the U.S.Congress ratified the North American Free Trade Agreement, in which the United States and Mexico agreed to reduce trade barriers simultaneously. Do the perceived payoffs shown here justify this approach to trade policy? Explain. d. Based on your understanding of the gains from trade (discussed in Chapters 3 and 9), do you think that these payoffs actually reflect a nation's welfare under the four possible outcomes?
5. The following problem was first considered by John von Neumann and is a fundamentalresult game theory.A and B play the following game:A writes down either number 1 or number 2, and B must guess which one.If the number that A has written down is i and B has guessed correctly, B receives i units from A.If B makes a wrong guess, B pays 4/5 of a unit to A.First we consider the expected gain of player B.Suppose B guesses 1 with probability p and 2 with probability 1 −p.Let X1 denote B’s gain (or loss) in a game where A has written down 1.Let X2 denote B’s gain (or loss) in a game where A has written down 2.(a) Find the pmf of X1 and X2(b) Find B’s expected gain for these two cases, E[X1] and E[X2].(c) What value of p maximizes the minimum possible value of B’s expected gain?Now consider the expected loss of player ASuppose that A writes down 1 with probability q and 2 with probability 1 −q.Let Y1 be A’s loss (or gain) if B chooses number 1.Let Y2 be A’s loss (or gain) if B…
While grading a final exam, an economics professordiscovers that two students have virtually identical answers.She is convinced the two cheated but cannot prove it. The professorspeaks with each student separately and offers the followingdeal: Sign a statement admitting to cheating. If both studentssign the statement, each will receive an “F” for the course. Ifonly one signs, he is allowed to withdraw from the course whilethe other student is expelled. If neither signs, both receive a “C”because the professor does not have sufficient evidence to provecheating.a. Draw the payoff matrix.b. Which outcome do you expect? Why?
Two farmers have unlimited access to a common plot of land and can let their cows graze on it. The matrix below shows the benefits they get from grazing either 1 or 2+ cows on the land. Farmer 2 Farmer1 1 cow 2+ cows 1 cow 8,8 2,10 2+cows 10,2 4,4 What kind of game is this? What is/are the Nash equilibrium/equilibria? What is/are the Pareto efficient outcome(s) in this game? (Hint: Remember that Pareto efficiency occurs when no one person can be made better off without someone else being made worse off) The government offers a reward or subsidy for communities where farmers only allow 1 cow to graze on the common field, resulting in a new payoff matrix:…
1. Consider the pricing game between firm 1 (row) and firm 2 (column) belowwhere each number represents the profits made by each firm.:Table 1: Pricing gameLow HighLow 288,288 360,216High 216,360 324,324 a) Point out the Nash equilibrium. Is this a unique Nash equilibrium?c) What type of commitment can firm 1 make to improve its pay-off?Can it be classified as a threat or promise? (Assume that the commitmentis credible.)d) How would you represent the game as a game tree with the option tocommit?2. Consider the signalling / production game with the order of play given below.Assuming that the signal is informative (i.e. education is sufficiently costly),how would you change the order of the game to make sure that poolingequilibriums are ruled out? Verbally motivate your answer.• Nature chooses ability of the workers a ∈ (H, L), ability is observed byworkers but not employers.• The worker choose an education level s ∈ (0, 1).• The employer offer contracts w(s).• The worker accepts or…