21. Let U=x²+y2 is the utility function of a worker who has 10 hours that to be allocated between labour supply (L) and leisure (x). Let y is a consumption good whose price is 1. Wage rate (w) is Rs 1 and non-wage income is 20. Find out L. a) 10 b) 0 c) 5 d) 8 e) none 22. On the basis of the above question, hen w=0 and non-wage income is 40, find out L. a) 10 b) 0 c) 5 d) 8 e) none

21. Let U=x²+y2 is the utility function of a worker who has 10 hours that to be allocated between labour supply (L) and leisure (x). Let y is a consumption good whose price is 1. Wage rate (w) is Rs 1 and non-wage income is 20. Find out L. a) 10 b) 0 c) 5 d) 8 e) none 22. On the basis of the above question, hen w=0 and non-wage income is 40, find out L. a) 10 b) 0 c) 5 d) 8 e) none

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter16: Labor Markets

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 16.10P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

21. Let U=x 2 +y 2 is the utility function of a worker who has 10 hours that to be allocatedbetween labour supply (L) and leisure (x). Let y is a consumption good whose price is 1.Wage rate (w) is Rs 1 and non-wage income is 20. Find out L.a) 10 b) 0 c) 5 d) 8 e) none 22. On the basis of the above question, hen w=0 and non-wage income is 40, find out L.a) 10 b) 0 c) 5 d) 8 e) none
Suppose that following represents the utility function of the individual U(c,l)=log⁡(c)+log⁡(l) c = consumption level of the individual and l = leisure, while the market wage is 10 and available time is 20. 1) Find and draw the labor supply function. 2) Suppose that the government introduces a cash grant for the labor (who is in the labor force) in the amount of R. Find and draw the labor supply function? Compare it to the labor supply function you have found in a). 3) Discuss the existence of reservation wage in the settings described in a and b? If your answer is : “there are no reservation wages under those settings”, please introduce a change in the policy described in b) to make sure that the reservation wage would exist.
Consider worker 1 with non-labor income Y facing a wage offer w and a utility function defined over consumption and leisure U(c,l) = lnC + 4lnl Compare worker 1 with worker 2 whose utility function is described by U(c,l) = cl. Which worker places a higher value on labor market work?
Follow up question g. Explain why the utility curves cannot be drawn so as to induce the worker to work between L1 and L2 hours. h Yelowitz (1995) studies a Medicaid reform measure that reduced the Medicaid work disincentive. One of the reforms he studied raised the Medicaid eligibility threshold income level by 33%. Draw a new version of the fifigure with a new labor–income curve that reflflects this change. Explain how this change might induce someone currently working L1 hours per year to work more, and be sure to draw indifffference curves to support your answer.
Consider a representative agent with the utility function U = ln(Ct)+ Nt The budget constraint is Ct = wtNt +Dt where wt is the wage and Dt is non-wage income (i.e. a dividend from ownership in the firm). The agent lives for only one period (period t), and hence its problem is static. (a) Derive an optimality condition characterizing optimal household behav- ior. (b) Solve for the optimal quantities of consumption and labor. Plz do fast asap, urgent.
A worker has 110 hours available in a week that can be used for leisure (L) or work (h). The utility function is U = (1 - α)ln(C) + α ln(L), where C is consumption. a) The price per unit of consumption is 1, the hourly wage is w, and the worker has a non-labor income of V. Show that the labor supply is: h* = (110(1-a)- (av)/w). Also, find the demand for consumption and leisure. b) What is the effect on labor supply of i) an increase in the hourly wage and ii) an increase in non-labor income? c) Set α = ½. What are C, L, and h when w = 200 and V = 10000? What is the reservation wage? d) What is the effect on labor supply of i) a 30% income tax and ii) a 10% wealth tax (on V)? e) What is the labor supply if V increases to 11600? f) An increase in V to 11600 gives the worker the same utility as w = 250 and V = 10000 (you do not need to show it). What are the income, substitution, and total effects on labor supply of an increase in wage from 200 to 250 while V remains at 10000?…
Consider worker 1 with non-labour income Y facing a wage offer w and a utility function defined over consumption and leisure. U(c,l) = lnC + 4lnl Give that the Slutsky equation holds for this worker.
Consider worker 1 with non-labour income Y facing a wage offer w and a utility function defined over consumption and leisure. U(c,l) = lnC + 4lnl a) Compare worker 1 with worker 2 whose utility function is described by U(c,l) = cl. Which worker places a higher value on labour market work? b) Suppose the worker participates in the labour market. Derive worker’s compensated labor supply function and the compensated labour supply elasticity with respect to wage as a function of utility level and wage. c) Derive worker’s uncompensated labour supply function (for labour market participants and non-participants) and the uncompensated labour supply elasticity (for labor market participants) with respect to wage as a function of non-labour income and wage.
The weekly preferences over consumption (C) and leisure(L) are defined by u(C, L) = √C + 3√L. The person receives a weekly allowance of m from The hourly wage is $18 per hour, and the person can work up to50 hours each week (T = z + L = 50), where z is the number of hours spent working). a)How many hours will the person work if her allowance is m= $450 per week b) What is the smallest allowance m for which the person will stopworking altogether (z∗ = 0) for a wage of w = 18?
1 The consumption-leisure framework Suppose that the representative consumer has the following utility function over consumption (c) and labour (n): u(c, l) = ln c − A 1 + � n 1+� (1) where, as usual, c denotes consumption and n denotes the number of hours of labour the consumer chooses to work, The constants A and � are outside the control of the individual, but each is strictly positive. Suppose the budget constraint (in real terms) faced by the individual is given by: c = (1 − t) · w · n (2) where t is the labour tax rate, w is the real hourly wage rate, and n is the number of hours the individual works. Remember, as seen in class, n + l = 1 is always true. Using the static consumption-leisure framework, answer the questions that follow. 1. State the utility maximization problem, and state carefully the choice variables in the problem. [2] 2. Write the Lagrangian function for this problem. [2] 3. Using the Lagrangian function from above, derive the first order condition with respect…
Consider worker 1 with non-labour income Y facing a wage offer w and a utility function defined over consumption and leisure. U(c,l) = lnC + 4lnl Derive worker’s income elasticity. Is leisure a normal or inferior good for this worker?
Consider a worker who is endowed with T hours of time and investment income V per week, faces a wage rate w per hour, and whose preferences over the consumption of goods, the price of a unit of which is p, and leisure can be represented by the utility function U(C,L) = C1/2L1/2. Find the worker’s labour supply. When is it positive? Will the worker ever work more than half their time endowment? (25%)