25. Let G be a connected, undirected graph, and let V be the set of all vertices in G. Define a relation R on V as follows: for any vertices a, b e V, a Rb if there is a path from a to b with an even number of edges. (A path may use the same edge more than once.) Prove that R is an equivalence relation.

25. Let G be a connected, undirected graph, and let V be the set of all vertices in G. Define a relation R on V as follows: for any vertices a, b e V, a Rb if there is a path from a to b with an even number of edges. (A path may use the same edge more than once.) Prove that R is an equivalence relation.

Elements Of Modern Algebra

8th Edition

ISBN:9781285463230

Author:Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie

Publisher:Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie

Chapter1: Fundamentals

Section1.7: Relations

Problem 11E: Let be a relation defined on the set of all integers by if and only if sum of and is odd. Decide...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Let be a relation defined on the set of all integers by if and only if sum of and is odd. Decide whether or not is an equivalence relation. Justify your decision.
Assume a directed acyclic graph is encoded as a relation R. Give a concise proposition stating that R is irreflexive (i.e., that no nodes have edges to themselves).
Let C be a relation defined on the set of all geometric polygons, defined by any two polygons in the set are related iff they have the same number of sides. Is a square related to rectangle?
Prove that the following ~ is an equivalence relation: Suppose W = (X,Y) is a graph. We define the relation ~ on X to be that x~y if and only if there exists a walk in W from x to y.
Draw a directed graph diagram for relation S on {0, 1, 2, 3,4}, where TSy iff x + y = 4
Define a relation on Z by x ~ y if and only if x + 2y is divisible by 3. Show that this relation is an equivalence relation.
Let L be the set of undirected graphs. Prove that L is in NL.
Recall that binary relations are merely sets of pairs of elements of some set. Therefore if R and Q are binary relations on a same set A, their union R ∪ Q as sets of pairs is also a binary relation on A. Is it true that if R and Q are antisymmetric then R ∪ Q is also antisymmetric? Prove that it is or give a counterexample.
i. Draw a connected bipartite graph with 5 labelled vertices, {a, b, c, d, e} = V and 5 edges.Based on the graph you’ve drawn, give the corresponding partition π = {V1, V2} and the relationρ ⊂ V1 × V2 corresponding with the edges.ii. Let A be a set of six elements and σ an equivalence relation on A such that the resultingpartition is {{a, b, f }, {c, e}, {d}}. Draw the directed graph corresponding with σ on A.iii. Draw a directed graph with 5 vertices and 10 edges (without duplicating any edges) repre-senting a relation ρ that is reflexive and antisymmetric, but not symmetric or transitive. Notehow these properties can be identified from the graph.
Let G be an undirected graph with a loop at every vertex.Show that the relation R on the set of vertices of G suchthat uRv if and only if there is an edge associated to {u, v}is a symmetric, reflexive relation on G.
Let G be a simple graph. Show that the relation R on theset of vertices of G such that uRv if and only if there isan edge associated to {u, v} is a symmetric, irreflexiverelation on G.
I have the following question, "Let R be an equivalence relation on A = {a, b, c, d, e, f, g} such that aRc, cRd, dRg and bR f . If thereare three distinct equivalence classes resulting from R, then determine these equivalence classes anddetermine all elements of R." Please if able explain step by step in detail.