(a) Internal (organic) building is not a good decision for both Disney and Pixar because internal resources are not highly relevant to the targeted resources (i.e., low relevancy). (b) Contractual alliance is not a good decision for both Disney and Pixar because the targeted resources are not highly tradable on the market (i.e., low tradability). The current difficulties in renewing their contract in the case illustrates this point. (c) Alliance with equity is not a good decision for both Disney and Pixar because the Pixar and Disney compete directly in production stage currently and will compete directly in marketing and distribution stages in the near future if alliance with equity works well (i.e., high closeness). (d) Acquisition is a natural decision based on the framework due to low relevancy, low tradability, high closeness, and easy integration.

Practical Management Science
6th Edition
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Chapter2: Introduction To Spreadsheet Modeling
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 20P: Julie James is opening a lemonade stand. She believes the fixed cost per week of running the stand...
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
What is the Worst explanation on Disney-Pixar case based on Build-Borrow-or-Buy Framework below?
Strategic
Resource
Gap
Low
Low
High
Low
Revisit
How relevant
are internal
resources?
How tradable
How close
to your resource
partner?
How well can
you integrate the
target firm?
build borrow buy
options or
reformulate strategy
Key
Question
are the targeted
resources?
High
High
Low
High
Strategic Alliance
Internal
Development
Action
• Contract
• Licensing
Acquisition
• Equity Alliance
• Joint Venture
Buy-Borrow
or-Build?
Build
Borrow
Buy
Contractual
Alliance
Alliance with
Equity
(a) Internal (organic) building is not a good decision for both Disney and Pixar because internal resources are not highly relevant to the
targeted resources (i.e., low relevancy).
(b) Contractual alliance is not a good decision for both Disney and Pixar because the targeted resources are not highly tradable on the
market (i.e., low tradability). The current difficulties in renewing their contract in the case illustrates this point.
(c) Alliance with equity is not a good decision for both Disney and Pixar because the Pixar and Disney compete directly in production stage
currently and will compete directly in marketing and distribution stages in the near future if alliance with equity works well (i.e., high
closeness).
(d) Acquisition is a natural decision based on the framework due to low relevancy, low tradability, high closeness, and easy integration.
Transcribed Image Text:What is the Worst explanation on Disney-Pixar case based on Build-Borrow-or-Buy Framework below? Strategic Resource Gap Low Low High Low Revisit How relevant are internal resources? How tradable How close to your resource partner? How well can you integrate the target firm? build borrow buy options or reformulate strategy Key Question are the targeted resources? High High Low High Strategic Alliance Internal Development Action • Contract • Licensing Acquisition • Equity Alliance • Joint Venture Buy-Borrow or-Build? Build Borrow Buy Contractual Alliance Alliance with Equity (a) Internal (organic) building is not a good decision for both Disney and Pixar because internal resources are not highly relevant to the targeted resources (i.e., low relevancy). (b) Contractual alliance is not a good decision for both Disney and Pixar because the targeted resources are not highly tradable on the market (i.e., low tradability). The current difficulties in renewing their contract in the case illustrates this point. (c) Alliance with equity is not a good decision for both Disney and Pixar because the Pixar and Disney compete directly in production stage currently and will compete directly in marketing and distribution stages in the near future if alliance with equity works well (i.e., high closeness). (d) Acquisition is a natural decision based on the framework due to low relevancy, low tradability, high closeness, and easy integration.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Outsourcing
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, operations-management and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Practical Management Science
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781337406659
Author:
WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Operations Management
Operations Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259667473
Author:
William J Stevenson
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259666100
Author:
F. Robert Jacobs, Richard B Chase
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Business in Action
Business in Action
Operations Management
ISBN:
9780135198100
Author:
BOVEE
Publisher:
PEARSON CO
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781285869681
Author:
Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781478623069
Author:
Steven Nahmias, Tava Lennon Olsen
Publisher:
Waveland Press, Inc.