A manufacturer of chemicals incurs a cost of $100,000 to produce a certain quantity of chemicals. In the process of producing the chemicals, the manufacturer emits pollution into the air that eventually results in $50,000 of medical bills for the people who live nearby. Identify the private Costs and the social costs in the following scenario. What are the private costs and social costs in this scenario? O Private costs are $50,000; social costs are $150,000. Private costs are $150,000; social costs are $50,000. O Private costs are $50,000; social costs are $100,000. O Private costs are $100,000; social costs are $150,000. O O O

A manufacturer of chemicals incurs a cost of $100,000 to produce a certain quantity of chemicals. In the process of producing the chemicals, the manufacturer emits pollution into the air that eventually results in $50,000 of medical bills for the people who live nearby. Identify the private Costs and the social costs in the following scenario. What are the private costs and social costs in this scenario? O Private costs are $50,000; social costs are $150,000. Private costs are $150,000; social costs are $50,000. O Private costs are $50,000; social costs are $100,000. O Private costs are $100,000; social costs are $150,000. O O O

Economics For Today

10th Edition

ISBN:9781337613040

Author:Tucker

Publisher:Tucker

Chapter14: Environmental Economics

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3SQ: From an economic viewpoint, the optimal amount of pollution a. is zero because all pollution imposes...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Assume that the marginal private costs of a film producing fuel-efficient can; is greater than the marginal social costs. Assume that the marginal private benefits of a firm producing fuel efficient cars are the same as the marginal social benefits. Discuss one wags.r that the government cans ï¬‚y to increase production and sales of fuel efficient cars to the socially desirable amount. Hint: the government is flying to affect production through costs, net benefits.
From an economic viewpoint, the optimal amount of pollution a. is zero because all pollution imposes costs on society. b. is that amount firms create when they maximize economic profits by setting their marginal private costs equal to market price. c. is that amount where the marginal social costs of producing a good precisely equals the price of the good. d. Both answers b. and c. are correct.
(External Costs with Variable Technology) Think of an industry that pollutes the water and has access to variable technology for reducing that pollution. Graphically illustrate and explain the impact of each of the following, other things constant, on the optimal level of water quality: a. New evidence is discovered about a greater risk of cancer from water pollution. b. The cost of pollution-control equipment increases. c. A technological improvement reduces the cost of pollution control.
The perfectly competitive profit-maximizing firm in Exhibit 6 creates water and air pollution as a consequence of producing its output of pigs. If pollution costs are borne by third parties, the firm will maximize economic profit by choosing to a. voluntarily incur costs to reduce its pollution. b. produce at output rate Q3. c. produce at output rate Q2. d. produce at output rate Q4. EXHIBIT 6 Private and Social Cost
Education provides both private benefits to those who receive it and broader social benefits for the economy as a whole. Think about the types of policies a government can follow to address the issue of positive spillovers in technology and then suggest a parallel set of policies that governments could follow for addressing positive externalities in education.
Show the market for cigarettes in equilibrium, assuming that there are no laws banning smoking in public. Label the equilibrium private market price and quantity as Pm and Qm. Add whatever is needed to the model to show the impact of the negative externality from second-hand smoking. (Hint: In this case it is the consumers, not the sellers, who are creating the negative externality.) Label the social optimal output and price as Fe and Qe. On the graph, shade in the deadweight loss at the market output.
In a market without environmental regulations, will the supply curve for a film account for private costs, external costs, both, or neither? Explain.
Is zero pollution possible under a marketable permits system? Why or why not?
Suppose that Sonys R. Is this a private or social benefit?