With the coronavirus vaccine, your decision to get vaccinated provides not just a benefit to yourself in protecting you from the disease, it also provides substantial benefits to others who you are likely to encounter during the course of your daily activities, protecting them from infection as well. This is an example of O Public good O Negative externality O Positive externality O Common ownership O Asymmetric information

With the coronavirus vaccine, your decision to get vaccinated provides not just a benefit to yourself in protecting you from the disease, it also provides substantial benefits to others who you are likely to encounter during the course of your daily activities, protecting them from infection as well. This is an example of O Public good O Negative externality O Positive externality O Common ownership O Asymmetric information

Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781337091992

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter10: Externalities

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5QR

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The market inverse supply curve for amoxicillin, an antibiotic with lots of generics, isrepresented by the equation P = 3 + 0.0006QS. The market demand curve is represented byQD = 187,500 − 625P.It is well known that antibiotic use generates negative externalities. How might thegovernment restrict the use of antibiotics? Show this on a demand-supply graph. Thendiscuss a potential unintended consequence of the government’s intervention.
Consider two ways to protect your car from theft.The Club (a steering wheel lock) makes it difficult fora car thief to take your car. Lojack (a tracking system)makes it easier for the police to catch the car thiefwho has stolen it. Which of these methods confersa negative externality on other car owners? Whichconfers a positive externality? Do you think there areany policy implications of your analysis?
Consider an infectious disease such as the flu which is spread primarily through virus particles in aerosolized respiratory droplets of already infected people. a In the midst of an infectious disease epidemic of this sort, is it privately rational for people to limit their exposure to other people, perhaps by staying home from work or not going to school? b An infected person who goes out into public areas and does not take precautions to contain their respiratory emissions clearly poses a negative externality on those around them. Does an uninfected person going out into public areas also pose a negative externality? c For a particularly severe disease outbreak of this sort, one possible government response is to exaggerate to the public both the harm that might arise from contracting the disease and the likelihood of contracting the disease. In what ways might such a strategy reduce the harm to the public from the disease epidemic? In what ways might such a strategy increase the…
please answer all. 5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradablepermits Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government allocates tradable pollution permits. Each firm faces different costs, so reducing pollution is more difficult for some firms than others. The following table shows the cost each firm faces to eliminate each unit of pollution. For each firm, assume that the cost of reducing pollution to zero (that is, eliminating all 4 units of pollution) is prohibitively expensive. Firm Cost of Eliminating the... First Unit of Pollution Second Unit…
. Some dissenting scientists at Environment Canada disagree with the estimate of $1.50 for theenvironmental externality. They believe that the incidence of the externality is not constant acrossdifferent levels of production; instead the size of the externality is proportional to the level of output.That is, the larger is the output, the larger is the externality. Their research suggests that the truesocial cost of cereal production diverges from private costs at every level of production by an amountequal to ten percent of production (note: ten percent, not ten percentage points).The government would like to know the economic effects of implementing a tax to internalise theexternality in this case. Draw the diagram for this market and policy. Solve for all relevant Ps and Qs.Calculate producer surplus
Based on what you saw in the videos about internalizing externalities, do you think that the "leaving it to the market" approach (i.e., market-based solutions, such as government-imposed incentives toward renewable energy initiatives) is sufficient to transition away from fossil fuels and a linear economy as we try to minimize the already visible impacts of climate change? Or, do you think that a command and control approach is warranted in this case? Explain. Note: I am not judging your position, but am looking at how you support your position given the fundamentals of command and control vs. market-based solutions given our current climate crisis.
Answer all parts please i have to submit this last question soon please 3. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradablepermits Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government allocates tradable pollution permits. Each firm faces different costs, so reducing pollution is more difficult for some firms than others. The following table shows the cost each firm faces to eliminate each unit of pollution. For each firm, assume that the cost of reducing pollution to zero (that is, eliminating all 4 units of pollution) is prohibitively expensive. Firm Cost of…
Both public goods and common resources involveexternalities.a. Are the externalities associated with public goodsgenerally positive or negative? Is the free-marketquantity of public goods generally greater or lessthan the socially efficient quantity? Cite examplesin your answer.b. Are the externalities associated with commonresources generally positive or negative? Is thefree-market use of common resources generallygreater or less than the socially efficient use?Cite examples in your answer.
Assuming no transaction costs, which legal rule best harnesses private information to deal with externalities? A. A liability rule B. A property rule C. An inalienability rule D. Criminalization
Consider a factory, located in the middle of nowhere, producing a nasty smell. As long as no one is around toexperience the unpleasant odor, are any externalities produced? Suppose that there was family next door to the smelly factory. Do we now have an externalities problem?Suppose that the family clearly possesses the right to a pleasant-smelling environment. Does this mean thatthe factory will be required to stop producing the bad smell? What can be a private solution to this problem?
Jimi loves turning up his electric guitar amp all theway, but his next-door neighbor hates listening tohim. How might Jimi and his neighbor reach a private solution to their problem? Describe potentialproblems that might make it hard for a privatesolution to occur
Under some conditions, command-and-control pollution standards could be just as good as a cap-and-trade program at bringing about a cost-effective allocation of total abatement responsibility across firms. Furthermore, the regulator could save the cost of running a cap-and-trade program. When would this most likely be the case? a.) If firms have very different technologies, are varying sizes, and there is a mix of older and newer plants, so it is safe to assume that the firms probably have very different marginal abatement cost curves. b.) If all firms have the same types of technologies, are about the same size, and have been in production for approximately the same length of time, so it is safe to assume that each firm’s abatement costs are similar, and the regulator can issue a one-size-fits-all standard. c.) If the regulator gathers detailed information about the technologies employed by every firm so it can figure out each firm’s marginal abatement cost curve. The…