A recent survey reported that small businesses spend 24 hours a week marketing their business. A local chamber of commerce claims that small businesses in their area are not growing because these businesses are spending less than 24 hours a week on marketing. The chamber conducts a survey of 80 small businesses within their state and finds that the average amount of time spent on marketing is 23.0 hours a week. Assuming that the population standard deviation is 5.4 hours, is there sufficient evidence to support the chamber of commerce’s claim at the 0.02 level of significance? Step 3 of 3 : Draw a conclusion and interpret the decision. 1. We reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is insufficient evidence at a 0.02 level of significance to support the chamber's claim that businesses are spending less than 24 hours a week on marketing. 2. We fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is insufficient evidence at a 0.02 level of significance to support the chamber's claim that businesses are spending less than 24 hours a week on marketing. 3. We fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level of significance to support the chamber's claim that businesses are spending less than 24 hours a week on marketing. 4. We reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level of significance to support the chamber's claim that businesses are spending less than 24 hours a week on marketing.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

100%

A recent survey reported that small businesses spend 24 hours a week marketing their business. A local chamber of commerce claims that small businesses in their area are not growing because these businesses are spending less than 24 hours a week on marketing. The chamber conducts a survey of 80 small businesses within their state and finds that the average amount of time spent on marketing is 23.0 hours a week. Assuming that the population standard deviation is 5.4 hours, is there sufficient evidence to support the chamber of commerce’s claim at the 0.02 level of significance?

Step 3 of 3 : Draw a conclusion and interpret the decision.

1. We reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is insufficient evidence at a 0.02 level of significance to support the chamber's claim that businesses are spending less than 24 hours a week on marketing.

2. We fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is insufficient evidence at a 0.02 level of significance to support the chamber's claim that businesses are spending less than 24 hours a week on marketing.

3. We fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level of significance to support the chamber's claim that businesses are spending less than 24 hours a week on marketing.

4. We reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level of significance to support the chamber's claim that businesses are spending less than 24 hours a week on marketing.

Expert Solution

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

$Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Equality of Variances$

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Recommended textbooks for you

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

Statistics

ISBN:

9781119256830

Author:

Amos Gilat

Publisher:

John Wiley & Sons Inc