A sample of 70mwomen is obtained, and their heights (in inches) and pulse rates (in beats per minute) are measured. The linear correlation coefficient is 0.255and the equation of the regression line is y(caret) 17.8 + 0.950 x where x represents height. The mean of the 70 heights is 62.7in and the mean of the 70 pulse rates is74.5 beats per minute. Find the best predicted pulse rate of a woman who is 68 in tall. Use a significance level of alpha equals 0.01

A sample of 70mwomen is obtained, and their heights (in inches) and pulse rates (in beats per minute) are measured. The linear correlation coefficient is 0.255and the equation of the regression line is y(caret) 17.8 + 0.950 x where x represents height. The mean of the 70 heights is 62.7in and the mean of the 70 pulse rates is74.5 beats per minute. Find the best predicted pulse rate of a woman who is 68 in tall. Use a significance level of alpha equals 0.01

Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Student Edition 2015

1st Edition

ISBN:9781680331141

Author:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT

Publisher:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT

Chapter4: Writing Linear Equations

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 14CR

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A sample of 7070 women is obtained, and their heights (in inches) and pulse rates (in beats per minute) are measured. The linear correlation coefficient is 0.2210.221 and the equation of the regression line is ModifyingAbove y with caret equals 17.6 plus 0.940 xy=17.6+0.940x, where x represents height. The mean of the 7070 heights is 62.862.8 in and the mean of the 7070 pulse rates is 77.377.3 beats per minute. Find the best predicted pulse rate of a woman who is 7474 in tall. Use a significance level of alpha equals 0.05α=0.05. The best predicted pulse rate of a woman who is 7474 in tall is nothing beats per minute.
Suppose IQ scores were obtained from randomly selected twins. For 20 such pairs of people, the linear correlation coefficient is 0.930 and the equation of the regression line is y=−10.69+1.11x, where x represents the IQ score of the twin born first. Also, the 20 x values have a mean of 98.28 and the 20 y values have a mean of 98.5. What is the best predicted IQ of the twin born second, given that the twin born first has an IQ of 92? Use a significance level of 0.05.LOADING... Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r.Question content area bottomPart 1The best predicted IQ of the twin born second is enter your response here.(Round to two decimal places as needed.)
A sample of 50 women is obtained, and their heights (in inches) and pulse rates (in beats per minute) are measured. The linear correlation coefficient is 0.245 and the equation of the regression line is y=17.6 + 0.910x,where x represents height. The mean of the 50 heights is 62.9 in and the mean of the 50 pulse rates is 72.3 beats per minute. Find the best predicted pulse rate of a woman who is 67 in tall. Use a significance level of (alpha equals) α=0.05.
on the basis of the value of linear correlation coefficient, would you conclude, at the /r/>0.9 level, that the data can be reasonably modeled linear equation?
Suppose IQ scores were obtained from randomly selected twins. For 20 such pairs of people, the linear correlation coefficient is 0.892 and the equation of the regression line is Modifying Above y= -1.91 + 1.01 x, where x represents the IQ score of the twin born the second. Also, the 20 x values have a mean of 100.07 and the 20 y values have a mean of 98.8 What is the best predicted IQ of the twin born first twin born first,given that the twin born second twin born secondhas an IQ of 96?Use a significance level of 0.05. Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r. Critical Values of the Pearson Correlation Coefficient r NOTE: To test H0: rhoρequals=0 against H1: rhoρnot equals≠0, reject H0 if the absolute value of r is greater than the critical value in the table. n a=0.05 a=0.01 4 0.950 0.990 5 0.878 0.959 6 0.811 0.917 7 0.754 0.875 8 0.707 0.834 9 0.666 0.798 10…
The fish in my pond have mean lenth 14 inches with a standard deviation of 2 inches and mean weight 4 pounds with a standard deviation of .8 pounds. The correlation coefficient of length and weight is .4. If the length of a particular randomly selected fish is reported to be 15 inches, then what should we predict for the weight of that fish using simple linear regression?
Imagine a study where all our data (x, y) falls perfectly on a flat and straight horizontal line. If we calculated the correlation coefficient r for this data, what would it be? What would that mean for our hypotheses?
In a study conducted by University of Arizona researchers, the total weight (in pounds) of garbage discarded in one week and the household size were recorded for 62 households. The linear correlation coefficient is r = 0.759 and the regression equation is y ^= 0.445 + 0.119x, where x represents the total weight of discarded garbage. The mean of the 62 garbage weights is 27.4 pounds and the 62 households have a mean size of 3.71 people. What is the best predicted number of people in a household that discards 50 pounds of garbage?
For 40 eruptions of the Old Faithful geyser in Yellowstone National Park, duration times (sec) were recorded along with the heights (ft) of the eruptions. The linear correlation coefficient is r = 0.0915 and the regression equation is = 119 + 0.0331x, where x represents duration time. The mean of the 40 duration times is 245.0 sec and the mean of the 40 heights is 127.2 ft. What is the best predicted height of an eruption with a duration time of 120 min?