Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Statistics
a trace evidence examiner elaborates as follows: "The viscose in our database is 0.1% (or 0.001) and through replicate surveys it has b- representative of the considered population. This is why I concluded that is app observe orange viscose if the defendant assaulted the victim from the back." Wh Α) The expert properly integrates the scientific findings to help the trier- findings in the context of the case; B) The expert commits a Prosecutor's fallacy; The expert incorrectly offers a likelihood ratio at the activity level base

a trace evidence examiner elaborates as follows: "The viscose in our database is 0.1% (or 0.001) and through replicate surveys it has b- representative of the considered population. This is why I concluded that is app observe orange viscose if the defendant assaulted the victim from the back." Wh Α) The expert properly integrates the scientific findings to help the trier- findings in the context of the case; B) The expert commits a Prosecutor's fallacy; The expert incorrectly offers a likelihood ratio at the activity level base

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter10: Statistics
Section10.1: Measures Of Center
Problem 9PPS
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
During cross-examination, a trace evidence examiner elaborates as follows:"The frequency of occurrence for orange viscose in our database is 0.1% (or 0.001) and through replicate surveys it has been demonstrated that this rate is representative of the considered population. This is why I concluded that is approximately 1000 (f=1/0.001) more likely to observe orange viscose if the defendant assaulted the victim from the back." What type of conclusion is this? A The expert properly integrates the scientific findings to help the trier-of-fact with the understanding of her findings in the context of the case; B) The expert commits a Prosecutor's fallacy; Ⓒ The expert incorrectly offers a likelihood ratio at the activity level based on factors pertaining to the source level only. D The expert correctly offers a likelihood ratio at the activity level.
Transcribed Image Text:During cross-examination, a trace evidence examiner elaborates as follows:"The frequency of occurrence for orange viscose in our database is 0.1% (or 0.001) and through replicate surveys it has been demonstrated that this rate is representative of the considered population. This is why I concluded that is approximately 1000 (f=1/0.001) more likely to observe orange viscose if the defendant assaulted the victim from the back." What type of conclusion is this? A The expert properly integrates the scientific findings to help the trier-of-fact with the understanding of her findings in the context of the case; B) The expert commits a Prosecutor's fallacy; Ⓒ The expert incorrectly offers a likelihood ratio at the activity level based on factors pertaining to the source level only. D The expert correctly offers a likelihood ratio at the activity level.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS