a. You work for a certain firm that is the sole provider of water services in a city. The market price of water is originally Php 27 per cubic metre. However, the CEO wants to sell the price of the water services higher. How will you determine the prices of the water services considering you are monopolising the water services? Include a graph that will explain your answers. Explain as detailed as you can and not less than 5 sentences.

a. You work for a certain firm that is the sole provider of water services in a city. The market price of water is originally Php 27 per cubic metre. However, the CEO wants to sell the price of the water services higher. How will you determine the prices of the water services considering you are monopolising the water services? Include a graph that will explain your answers. Explain as detailed as you can and not less than 5 sentences.

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337106665

Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Chapter14: Indirect Price Discrimination

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4MC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Imagine that you ale managing a small firm and thinking about entering the market of a monopolist. The monopolist is currently charging a high price, and you have calculated that you can make a nice profit charging 10 less than the monopolist. Before you go ahead and challenge the monopolist, what possibility should you consider for how the monopolist might react?
Draw a monopolists demand curve, marginal revenue, and marginal cost curves. Identify the monopolists profit-maximizing output level. Now, think about a slightly higher level of output (sayQ0+1). According to the graph, is there any consumer willing to pay more than the marginal cost of that new level of output? If so, what does this mean?
What is the usual shape of a total revenue curve for a monopolist? Why?
For many years, the Justice Department has tried to break up large firms like IBM, Microsoft, and most recently Google, on the grounds that their large market share made them essentially monopolies. In a global market, where U.S. films compete with firms from other countries, would this policy make the same sense as it might in a purely domestic context?
Intellectual property laws are intended to promote innovation, but some economists, such as Milton Friedman, have argued that such laws are not desirable. In the United States, there is no intellectual property protection for food recipes or for fashion designs. Considering the state of these two industries, and hearing in mind the discussion of the inefficiency of monopolies, can you think of any reasons why intellectual property laws might hinder innovation in some cases?
In what sense is a natural monopoly natural?