please help asap An article in Wear (1992, Vol. 152, pp. 171-181) presents data on the fretting wear of mild steel and oil viscosity. Representative datafollow withx- oil viscosity and y - wear volume (10“ cubic millimeters).y 240 181 193 155 172 110 113 7594x 1.69.415.5 20.0 22.0 35.5 43.0 40.5 33.0Round your answers to two decimal places (e.g. 98.76).(a) Construct a scatter plot of the data. Does a simple linear regression model appear to be plausible?O YesO No(b) Fit the simple linear regression model using least squares. Find an estimate of o.F = Bo+ B 1xBo =ii(c) Predict fretting wear when viscosity x- 30.(d) Obtain the fitted value of y when x- 22.0 and calculate the corresponding residual.e =i

Note- Since you have posted a question with multiple sub-parts, we will solve the first three…

Answered: An article in Wear (1992, Vol. 152, pp.…

Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction

4th Edition

ISBN:9781285463247

Author:David Poole

Publisher:David Poole

Chapter7: Distance And Approximation

Section7.3: Least Squares Approximation

Problem 31EQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

An article in the Fire Safety Journal (“The Effect of Nozzle Design on the Stability and Performance of Turbulent Water Jets,” Vol. 4, August 1981) describes an experiment in which a shape factor was determined for several different nozzle designs at six levels of jet efflux velocity. Interest focused on potential differences between nozzle designs (blocks), with velocity considered as a nuisance variable. The data are shown below: Jet Efflux Velocity (m/s) Nozzle Design 11.73 14.37 16.59 20.43 23.46 28.74 1 0.78 0.80 0.81 0.75 0.77 0.78 2 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.86 0.81 0.83 3 0.93 0.92 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.83 4 1.14 0.97 0.98 0.88 0.86 0.83 5 0.97 0.86 0.78 0.76 0.76 0.75 1) Write the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis (for the factor). 2) Find the ANOVA table. (round to five decimal places). 3) What is your decision about the null hypothesis, consider ?. 4) If your decision in part (4) was reject , perform Tukey test to determine which pairwise means are…
An investigator wants to test if there is a difference in endotoxin levels in children who are exposed to endotoxin as a function of their proximity to operating farms. The following are endotoxin levels in units per milligram of dust sampled from children’s mattresses, organized by children’s proximity to farms. Within 5 Miles 54 62 78 90 70 5-24.9 Miles 28 42 39 81 65 25-49.9 Miles 37 29 30 50 53 50 Miles or More 36 19 22 28 27 Total Sample (Ordered Smallest to Largest) < 5 Miles 5-24.9 Miles 25-49.9 Miles 50+ Miles < 5 Miles 5-24.9 Miles 25-49.9 Miles 50+ Miles…
The efficiency ratio for a steel specimen immersed in a phosphating tank is the weight of the phosphate coating divided by the metal loss (both in mg/ft2). The article “Statistical Process Control of a Phosphate Coating Line” (Wire J. Intl., May 1997: 78–81) gave the accompanying data on tank temperature (x) and efficiency ratio (y).Temp. 170 172 173 174 174 175 176Ratio .84 1.31 1.42 1.03 1.07 1.08 1.04Temp. 177 180 180 180 180 180 181Ratio 1.80 1.45 1.60 1.61 2.13 2.15 .84Temp. 181 182 182 182 182 184 184Ratio 1.43 .90 1.81 1.94 2.68 1.49 2.52Temp. 185 186 188Ratio 3.00 1.87 3.08a. Construct stem-and-leaf displays of both temperature and efficiency ratio, and comment on interesting features.b. Is the value of efficiency ratio completely and uniquely determined by tank temperature? Explain your reasoning.c. Construct a scatterplot of the data. Does it appear that efficiency ratio could be very well predicted by the value of temperature? Explain your reasoning.
In Applied Life Data Analysis (Wiley, 1982), Wayne Nelson presents the breakdown time of an insulating fluid between electrodes at 34 kV. The times, in minutes, are as follows: 0.19, 0.78, 0.96, 1.31, 2.78, 3.16, 4.15, 4.67, 4.85, 6.50, 7.35, 8.01, 8.27, 12.06, 31.75, 32.52, 33.91, 36.71, and 72.89. Calculate the sample mean and sample standard deviation.
Construct a hypothesis addressing which potato piece will have the greatest surface-area-to-volume ratio. Explain. Table 1a Why Are Cells Small Length (l) (cm) Width (w) (cm) Height (h) (cm) Size of Cross Section (h x w) (cm) Distance Traveled by IKI from Potato Edge (cm) Area of White Region (l x w) (cm) 2.50 2.50 2.50 6.25 cm 0.20 cm 2.64 cm 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00cm 0.30 cm 1.87 cm 1.50 1.50 1.50 2.25 cm 0.50 cm 1.50 cm 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 cm 0.40 0.60 cm 2.00 0.50 0.50 0.25 cm 0.20 cm 0.15 cm 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.25 cm 0.30 cm 0.10 cm
A study is made of the relationship between annual production volume of Good A and factory floor area. Table below shows the data from a sample of 10 factories. Factory Factory floor area, X (‘000m2 ) Annual production volume, Y ($‘ 000) 1 40 3.5 2 600 25.0 3 60 4.8 4 72 3.5 5 400 30.0 6 90 5.0 7 200 12.0 8 70 4.5 9 80 5.0 10 84 6.0 Construct a scatter plot.
An article in the Journal of Environmental Engineering (1989, Vol. 115(3), pp. 608–619) reported the results of a study on the occurrence of sodium and chloride in surface streams in central Rhode Island. The following data are chloride concentration y (in milligrams per liter) and roadway area in the watershed x (in percentage).
) The following table shows 10 communities ranked by decayed, missing, or filled (DMF) teeth per 100 children and fluoride concentration in ppm in the public water supply: Rank by DMF Teeth FluorideCommunity per 100 children X Concentration Y 1 8 1 2 9 3 3 7 4 4 3 9 5 2 8 6 4 77 1…
5.25. Representative data on x = carbonation depth (in millimeters) and y = strength (in megapascals) for a sample of concrete core specimens taken from a particular building were read from a plot in the article “The Carbonation of Concrete Structures in the Tropical Environment of Singapore” (Magazine of Concrete Research [1996]: 293-300): Depth, x 8.0 20.0 20.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 50.0 55.0 65.0 Strength, y 22.8 17.1 21.1 16.1 13.4 12.4 11.4 9.7 6.8 a. Construct a scatterplot. Does the relationship between carbonation depth and strength appear to be linear? Yes, the relationship between carbonation depth and strength appears to be linear however it is a negative linear relation. b. Find the equation of the of the least-squares line.c. What would you predict for strength when carbonation depth is 25 mm?d. Explain why it would not be reasonable to use the least-squares line to predict strength when carbonation depth…
An article in Technometrics (1974, Vol. 16, pp. 523–531) considered the following stack-loss data from a plant oxidizing ammonia to nitric acid. Twenty-one daily responses of stack loss (the amount of ammonia escaping) were measured with air flow x1, temperature x2, and acid concentration x3. y = 42, 37, 37, 28, 18, 18, 19, 20, 15, 14, 14, 13, 11, 12, 8, 7, 8, 8, 9, 15, 15 x1 = 80, 80, 75, 62, 62, 62, 62, 62, 58, 58, 58, 58, 58, 58, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 56, 70 x2 = 27, 27, 25, 24, 22, 23, 24, 24, 23, 18, 18, 17, 18, 19, 18, 18, 19, 19, 20, 20, 20 x3 = 89, 88, 90, 87, 87, 87, 93, 93, 87, 80, 89, 88, 82, 93, 89, 86, 72, 79, 80, 82, 91 (a) Fit a linear regression model relating the results of the stack loss to the three regressor variables. (b) Estimate σ2. (c) Find the standard error se(βj). (d) Use the model in part (a) to predict stack loss when x1 = 60, x2 = 26, and x3 = 85.
An article in the Journal of Applied Polymer Science (Vol. 56, pp. 471–476, 1995) studied the effect of the mole ratio of sebacic acid on the intrinsic viscosity of copolyesters.- The data follows: Viscosity 0.45 0.2 0.34 0.58 0.7 0.57 0.55 0.44 Mole ratio 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 (a) Construct a scatter diagram of the data.
Use tables to express and represent the descriptive statistics for thevariables below. Years GDP growth (annual %) Gross capital formation (annual % growth) Labor force participation rate, total (% of total population ages 15-64) (modeled ILO estimate) 2019 0.892 2.556 71.38 2018 1.89 3.862 70.44 2017 0.997 6.158 71.15 2016 1.375 -0.103 70.31 2015 0.921 -6.13 68.74 2014 0.69 3.84 68.39 2013 0.518 5.473 68.53 2012 -0.614 -5.75 67.42 2011 1.73 8.972 67.63 2010 -1.457 -2.039 67.84 2009 -4.345 -18.427 68.15 2008 -0.8117 -8.009 68.46

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction

Algebra

ISBN:

9781285463247

Author:

David Poole

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…

Algebra

ISBN:

9781680331141

Author:

HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT

Publisher:

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction

Algebra

ISBN:

9781285463247

Author:

David Poole

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…

Algebra

ISBN:

9781680331141

Author:

HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT

Publisher:

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS