Another researcher reads the study regarding cleanliness and morality and is very skeptical. She recreates the original experiment and runs it on her own sample. She does not get the same results; in fact, her results suggest that cleanliness has no effect on morality.. Which of the following conclusions is BEST? There is clearly no way to know about the effect of smell on behavior. Because the original study did not replicate, this means the original results are certainly false. Because the original study did not replicate, this suggests there may be issues with the original study's validity. The original researcher must have made up their data and should be investigated for fraud. Because the original study did not replicate, this means the second researcher's results are certainly false.

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter10: Statistics
Section10.6: Summarizing Categorical Data
Problem 27PPS
icon
Related questions
Question
100%

I am a little confused on this question , please help!  please don't just list the answers , if you can explain how you got your answer that would be great. Thank you for your help.

I have attached the problem .Please view both attachments before answering. 

A researcher wonders whether cleanliness encourages morality. She has
participants unscramble either neutral words (e.g., "push") or words
related to cleanliness (e.g., "wash). She then has them read stories about
people behaving with questionable morality (e.g., using an American flag
to clean up a spill). They rate how acceptable these behaviors are on a
scale from "perfectly OK" to "extremely wrong."
Transcribed Image Text:A researcher wonders whether cleanliness encourages morality. She has participants unscramble either neutral words (e.g., "push") or words related to cleanliness (e.g., "wash). She then has them read stories about people behaving with questionable morality (e.g., using an American flag to clean up a spill). They rate how acceptable these behaviors are on a scale from "perfectly OK" to "extremely wrong."
Another researcher reads the study regarding cleanliness and
morality and is very skeptical. She recreates the original experiment and
runs it on her own sample. She does not get the same results; in fact, her
results suggest that cleanliness has no effect on morality.. Which of the
following conclusions is BEST?
O There is clearly no way to know about the effect of smell on behavior.
Because the original study did not replicate, this means the original results are
certainly false.
Because the original study did not replicate, this suggests there may be issues
with the original study's validity.
O The original researcher must have made up their data and should be
investigated for fraud.
Because the original study did not replicate, this means the second researcher's
results are certainly false.
Transcribed Image Text:Another researcher reads the study regarding cleanliness and morality and is very skeptical. She recreates the original experiment and runs it on her own sample. She does not get the same results; in fact, her results suggest that cleanliness has no effect on morality.. Which of the following conclusions is BEST? O There is clearly no way to know about the effect of smell on behavior. Because the original study did not replicate, this means the original results are certainly false. Because the original study did not replicate, this suggests there may be issues with the original study's validity. O The original researcher must have made up their data and should be investigated for fraud. Because the original study did not replicate, this means the second researcher's results are certainly false.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill