As you know, given z e C, z + 0, then z1/2 is a set containing two distinct elements, so that the formula f(z) = z1/² does not define a function. A way to define the complex square root as a function (actually, to define many complex square roots) is the following. Given z E C denote by |2| its modulus and (when z + 0) by Arg(z) the principal value of its argument (so that Arg(z) E (–1, 7]). Define a function f(z) by setting f(0) = 0, f(2) = Vlzle*Arg(=)/2 if z +0, and then define a function g(z) by setting 9(2) = -Vlz|e* Arg(=)/2 if z + 0. g(0) = 0, (i) Check that f(1) = 1 while g(1) = –1, so that f and g are different functions. = z and g(z)² = z for every z E C, so that both functions would have the right to be called complex square root. The fact that there is more than one complex square root leads to call f(2) and g(z) branches of the complex square root. (iii) The restriction of f(z) to the unit circle {eit :t e (-n, 7]} defines a function p(t) = f(et) of the real variable t e (–n, T] with complex values. Show that lim e(t) = –i, t→(-n)+ lim φ(t) = i. t→Tー Do you think that lim f(2) z--1 exists? Why?
As you know, given z e C, z + 0, then z1/2 is a set containing two distinct elements, so that the formula f(z) = z1/² does not define a function. A way to define the complex square root as a function (actually, to define many complex square roots) is the following. Given z E C denote by |2| its modulus and (when z + 0) by Arg(z) the principal value of its argument (so that Arg(z) E (–1, 7]). Define a function f(z) by setting f(0) = 0, f(2) = Vlzle*Arg(=)/2 if z +0, and then define a function g(z) by setting 9(2) = -Vlz|e* Arg(=)/2 if z + 0. g(0) = 0, (i) Check that f(1) = 1 while g(1) = –1, so that f and g are different functions. = z and g(z)² = z for every z E C, so that both functions would have the right to be called complex square root. The fact that there is more than one complex square root leads to call f(2) and g(z) branches of the complex square root. (iii) The restriction of f(z) to the unit circle {eit :t e (-n, 7]} defines a function p(t) = f(et) of the real variable t e (–n, T] with complex values. Show that lim e(t) = –i, t→(-n)+ lim φ(t) = i. t→Tー Do you think that lim f(2) z--1 exists? Why?
Elements Of Modern Algebra
8th Edition
ISBN:9781285463230
Author:Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Publisher:Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Chapter7: Real And Complex Numbers
Section7.3: De Moivre’s Theorem And Roots Of Complex Numbers
Problem 9E
Related questions
Topic Video
Question
100%
Could you explain how to do this in detail?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 3 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, advanced-math and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Elements Of Modern Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463230
Author:
Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage
Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463247
Author:
David Poole
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elements Of Modern Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463230
Author:
Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage
Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463247
Author:
David Poole
Publisher:
Cengage Learning