Assume Australia, a large country, exports wine and imports cars. Recently climate change has resulted in very wet weather, reducing wine production in Australia, and increasing the world price of wine relative to cars. a. Explain how this can reduce the welfare of Australia, using the production possibility frontier and indifference curve graph to support your answer. b. While the normal conclusion is that Australia loses out from the severe weather, that is not always the case. In fact, Australia can instead experience a gain in welfare from this event. Explain how, using the production possibility frontier and indifference curve graph to support your answer.

Assume Australia, a large country, exports wine and imports cars. Recently climate change has resulted in very wet weather, reducing wine production in Australia, and increasing the world price of wine relative to cars. a. Explain how this can reduce the welfare of Australia, using the production possibility frontier and indifference curve graph to support your answer. b. While the normal conclusion is that Australia loses out from the severe weather, that is not always the case. In fact, Australia can instead experience a gain in welfare from this event. Explain how, using the production possibility frontier and indifference curve graph to support your answer.

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter1: The Role And Method Of Economics

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

(d) Determine the optimal consumption and production at Home and Foreign under autarky. Depict this situation in a graph that includes each country’s PPF and indifference curves for the representative consumer. This was the question, it does not answer the question and no graph is included?
If an economy can produce various combinationsof food and shelter along a productionpossibilities curve (PPC), then if we increase theproduction of shelter along the PPC, which ofthe following is true?a. We also increase the production of food.b. We must decrease the production of food.This forgone food production representsthe opportunity cost of the increase inshelter.c. We cannot change the production of food.d. The concept of opportunity cost does notapply along PPC.
Combinations of goods outside the productionpossibilities curve (PPC) have which of the followingcharacteristics?a. They are attainable today only if weemploy all unemployed or underemployedresources.b. They are not attainable given our existingstock of resources and technology.c. They imply that some resources, such aslabor, are unemployed or underemployed.d. None of the answers is correct.
During the Second World War, Germanys factories were decimated. It also suffered many human casualties, both soldiers and civilians. How did the war affect Germanys production possibilities curve?
Evidence accumulates that the use of fertilizers, which increases agricultural production greatly, damages water quality. Explain in words how you would draw a production possibility curve to depict this (i.e. which good should be placed on each axis) and why your curve would have a particular shape.
Pls help with below homework. David is in a car accident that leaves him paralysed. Using the Grossman model, show how the car accident is likely to affect David's Production Possibility Frontier, optimal H, and optimal Z. Assume that David's indifference curves are such that he only values Z. Please provide graph.
Review the numbers for Canada and Venezuelafrom Table 33.12 which describes how many barrelsof oil and tons of lumber the workers can produce. Usethese numbers to answer the rest of this question.a. Draw a production possibilities frontier for eachcountry. Assume there are 100 workers in eachcountry. Canadians and Venezuelans desire bothoil and lumber. Canadians want at least 2,000tons of lumber. Mark a point on their productionpossibilities where they can get at least 3,000tons.b. Assume that the Canadians specializecompletely because they figured out they havea comparative advantage in lumber. They arewilling to give up 1,000 tons of lumber. Howmuch oil should they ask for in return for thislumber to be as well off as they were with notrade? How much should they ask for if theywant to gain from trading with Venezuela? Note:We can think of this “ask” as the relative price ortrade price of lumber.c. Is the Canadian “ask” you identified in (b) alsobeneficial for Venezuelans? Use the…
Suppose the economy initially produces 15,000 gallons of drinking water and 450,000 tons of steel, which is represented by point A. The opportunity cost of producing an additional 5,000 gallons of drinking water (that is, moving production to point B) is (72,000, 135,000, 90,000, 54,000, 108,000) tons of steelSuppose, instead, that the economy currently produces 378,000 tons of steel and 20,000 gallons of drinking water, which is represented by point B. Now the opportunity cost of producing an additional 5,000 gallons of drinking water (that is, moving to point C) is (72,000, 135,000, 90,000, 54,000, 108,000) ons of steel.Comparing your answers in the two previous paragraphs, you can see that the opportunity cost of 5,000 additional gallons of drinking water at point B is (Less, Equal, Or Greater Than) the opportunity cost of 5,000 additional gallons of drinking water at point A. This reflects the (Notion that Countries can gain from trade, Law of Increasing Opportunity Costs, Fact…
why is the market for recycled aluminium good and the market for plastic bad in the US? Depict this with a firm input choice model. I understand that recycled plastic decreases in qualiy everytime it is recycled while aluminium does not and can be recylced without the decrease in quality, but I dont know how to depict this graphically
Suppose an economyuses two resorces (labor and capital) to produce two goods (wheat and cloth). Captial is relativley more useful in prducing cloth, and labor ir relativley more useful in prducing wheat. If the supply of cpatial falls by 10% and the suppy of labor increases by 10%, how will the PPF for wheat and cloth change?
Can you confirm that I am correct with these positive and normative statements: Positive statement: When oil production slows in Texas, employment and tax revenues decline, and budget cuts at the state and local levels often follow. (Craymer has estimated that the state loses $85 million per year for every $1 decrease in oil prices.) Normative statement:If Russia agrees to production cuts and COVID-19 goes dormant in the hot summer months, as some experts expect, Texas’ coffers will have time to recover before lawmakers convene in 2021 to write a new budget. Or would this be a normative statement:Experts said Texas is better positioned to handle an oil price collapse today thanks to a diversified economy. The last collapse in oil prices, in 2014, also forced the industry to cut costs and otherwise become more efficient. But University of Texas at Austin energy resources professor Michael Webber said COVID-19 throws an unprecedented economic variable into the mix.
Would an op-ed piece in a newspaper urging the adoption of a particular economic policy be a positive or normative statement?