Can economics help us to understand, and deal with, the prospect of climate change due to human activities? Your answer should include reference to at least three of the following aspects of the problem: a) A carbon tax vs cap and trade b) The UK’s legal commitment to reduce net carbon emissions to zero by 2050 c) Assessing costs to future generations d) Bargaining over climate change e) Environmental dynamics

Can economics help us to understand, and deal with, the prospect of climate change due to human activities? Your answer should include reference to at least three of the following aspects of the problem: a) A carbon tax vs cap and trade b) The UK’s legal commitment to reduce net carbon emissions to zero by 2050 c) Assessing costs to future generations d) Bargaining over climate change e) Environmental dynamics

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter1: The Role And Method Of Economics

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Would an op-ed piece in a newspaper urging the adoption of a particular economic policy be a positive or normative statement?
What makes climate change an economic problem? And if it is, how should policy dealwith it?Your answer should include reference to at least three of the following aspects of theproblem:a) Climate change as an externalityb) A carbon tax vs. cap and tradec) Cost-benefit analysisd) Assessing costs to future generationse) Environmental dynamics
Critically analyse the macroeconomic and financial effects of climate change. How do these effectsdiffer between the Global South and the Global North?
What are the two main approaches to tackle the problem of global warming and climate change? Next, compare the two approaches along the following dimension: Based on the current state of scientific and economic knowledge, which of the two types of policy is most likely to be cost-effective? Does it mean it will be used? Explain.
The climate policy toolkit has, to-date, mostly focused on demand side policies (i.e. policies that affect the pollution demand curve), some of which are ‘command-andcontrol’ and others are market based (e.g. cap-and-trade schemes, carbon taxes). (a) Explain what is meant by command-and-control in terms of a demand side climate change policy. What are the pros and cons of this as a policy option? (b) Using a diagram, explain how a carbon tax could help reduce pollution.
Case: Despite 2015 Paris agreement, global carbon emissions increased 1.7 percent in 2017 and a further 2.7 percent in 2018; it has been estimated that the rate of increase in 2019 will be among the highest on record. The last four years have been the hottest on record, with 2019 on track to make it five. But analyses suggest that fast action now can reduce carbon emissions within 12 years and hold global increases below 2 degrees C and perhaps 1.5. Even though carbon emissions in The Gambia, Morocco and India are expected to rise, they’ll fall short of exceeding the 1.5-degree Celsius limit. But some countries, such as Saudi Arabia, Russia, and United States, are not trying hard enough. a. Explain the inefficiency in this case! Use graphics b. Why can't this problem be solved through market mechanisms as in private goods? c. Give possible public (global) solutions and private (global) solutions to this and what are the advantages and disadvantages of each.
Please no written by hand solutions Discuss how do you think Marxian Economics treats the theme of environmental crisis. Keep the following question in the back of your mind: if the destruction of nature and human beings is harmful and not desired by anyone, why do we still experience the negative impacts of that? Address the following topics: How technical change may harm the environment, How the choice for specific technologies is not necessarily an option, but it may be dictated by the market. Is capitalism compatible with sustainability? (Hint: both yes and no are possible answers, but I want you to focus on why).
I would say that people who disagree about normative ethical theory CAN still reach an agreement on practical ethical questions in the business world. For the most part, everyone at the end of the day is going to agree on the idea that we must protect the place we all call home-the earth. With that being said, no matter the personal beliefs that everyone has, if they can work together to ensure that factor is being kept in place, they are more than likely going to. That would be on the extreme end. If two different employees had different views regarding the various theories, I am sure they would still work together to come to an agreement that would be for the betterment of the company because they both share the same desire to do well for themselves and the company. please help respond to this discussion post
Some people argue that we need “more proof ” or “betterscience” before we commit to changes in our energyeconomy. How much certainty do you think we needbefore we take action regarding climate change? Howmuch certainty do you need in your own life before youmake a major decision? Should nations and elected officialsfollow a different standard? Do you feel that theprecautionary principle (pp. 155, 220) is an appropriatestandard in the case of global climate change? Why orwhy not?
How can monetary policy, fiscal policy and financial sector regulation help in the fight against climate change? a) What are the projected economic costs of climate change in the short, medium and long term? b) What are the economic costs associated with the transition to a greener technology?
Presently, there is a major conference in Glasgow Scotland regarding climate change, neither the first nor the last attempt at this. Reactions range from hopeful optimism to downright cynicism. To be sure climate change is a global issue. There are many causes, from the results of economic activity to natural forces in the earth's core we can do little about. How do you feel about the drive to control climate change. What have you done to "go green", or are you one of the skeptics?
The climate policy toolkit has, to-date, mostly focused on demand side policies (i.e. policies that affect the pollution demand curve), some of which are ‘command-and control’ and others are market based (e.g. cap-and-trade schemes, carbon taxes). (a) Using a diagram or diagrams, explain how a cap-and-trade scheme could result in pollution reduction. (b) What is the Emissions Reduction Fund and what are its pros and cons? 1(c) Of the following four policy options, which one do you favour as a demandside policy and why? i. command-and-control in terms of a demand side climatechange ii. carbon tax iii. Emissions Reduction Fund iv. cap-and-trade scheme