Can someone please explain it to me in part c why the p value is wrong?ASAP??!!! O Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.O Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than20.(c) n= 30, t = -0.6P-value = 0.277State the conclusion in the problem context.O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.O Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than20.O Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.You may need to use the appropriate table in the Appendix of Tables to answer this question.22°CSunnyENG The paint used to make lines on roads must reflect enough light to be clearly visible at night. Let µ denote the true average reflectometer reading for a new type of paintunder consideration. A test of H: = 20 versus H: µ 20 will be based on a random sample of size n from a normal population distribution. What conclusion isappropriate in each of the following situations? (Round your P-values to three decimal places.)A USE SALT(a) n = 11, t = 3.3, a = 0.05P-value = 0.0040State the conclusion in the problem context.O Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than20.O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than20.O Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.(b) n = 7, t = 1.6, a = 0.01P-value = 0.0804State the conclusion in the problem context.O Reject the null hypothesis There

Question

Can someone please explain it to me in part c why the p value is wrong?ASAP??!!! O Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.O Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than20.(c) n= 30, t = -0.6P-value = 0.277State the conclusion in the problem context.O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.O Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than20.O Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.You may need to use the appropriate table in the Appendix of Tables to answer this question.22°CSunnyENG The paint used to make lines on roads must reflect enough light to be clearly visible at night. Let µ denote the true average reflectometer reading for a new type of paintunder consideration. A test of H: = 20 versus H: µ > 20 will be based on a random sample of size n from a normal population distribution. What conclusion isappropriate in each of the following situations? (Round your P-values to three decimal places.)A USE SALT(a) n = 11, t = 3.3, a = 0.05P-value = 0.0040State the conclusion in the problem context.O Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than20.O Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than20.O Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the new paint has a reflectometer reading higher than 20.(b) n = 7, t = 1.6, a = 0.01P-value = 0.0804State the conclusion in the problem context.O Reject the null hypothesis There

Accepted Answer

According to the given information in this question
We need to check why p value is wrong