Caroline and Alana are 2 sisters who live in a village called Deadend where no work is available. To go to the nearest city where jobs are available, they need to buy a bus pass for $50 dollars a week. Both receive an allowance of Yn from their parents. Illustrate in two different graphs Caroline and Alana’s s situations in the following two cases: Caroline’s preferences are such that she optimally decides to stay home receiving her parents’ allowance of Yn given the wage rate available in the nearest city and the cost of the bus pass. Alana’s preferences are such that she optimally chooses to commute and work h* given the wage rate and the cost of the bus pass and Yn.

Caroline and Alana are 2 sisters who live in a village called Deadend where no work is available. To go to the nearest city where jobs are available, they need to buy a bus pass for $50 dollars a week. Both receive an allowance of Yn from their parents. Illustrate in two different graphs Caroline and Alana’s s situations in the following two cases: Caroline’s preferences are such that she optimally decides to stay home receiving her parents’ allowance of Yn given the wage rate available in the nearest city and the cost of the bus pass. Alana’s preferences are such that she optimally chooses to commute and work h* given the wage rate and the cost of the bus pass and Yn.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter3: Preferences And Utility

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3.15P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider a hypothetical consumer named Hayden who is shopping for bread and brie. The graph with bread and brie on the axes presents the utility‑maximizing combinations of bread and brie that Hayden chooses when the price of bread is $1.00$1.00 per loaf and the price of brie is $4.00$4.00 and $6.00$6.00 per wheel, respectively. The other graph shows Hayden's demand curve for brie. The two points and associated values in the graph for bread and brie combinations correspond to points A and B in the graph of the demand curve for brie. What are the specific prices and quantities of brie associated with points A and B on Hayden's demand curve? price of brie at point A: $$ quantity demanded at point A: price of brie at point B: $$ quantity demanded at point B:
Heather and Jeremiah both enjoy sunflower butter (s) and jelly (j) sandwiches, but they have varying preferences regarding the optimal ratio of the two. Heather prefers her sandwiches to have 6 spoonfuls of sunflower butter for every 3 scoops of jelly, whereas Jeremiah prefers 3 scoops of sunflower butter for every 5 scoops of jelly. They both would prefer as many sandwiches as possible, but derive no utility from sandwiches without their preferred ratio of s and j. A) Write down a utility function for both Heather and Jeremiah regarding consumption of s and j (U(s,j)) B) On the same graph, draw a set of indifference curves for both Heather and Jeremiah, labeling which is which. C) In addition to s and j, Heather and Jeremiah now need bread, b, to make sandwiches. Heather prefers to separate her sunflower butter and jelly and therefore uses 3 slices of bread per sandwich. Write down Heather’s utility function Uh(s,j,b) as a function of the three inputs.
Reese thinks peanut butter and chocolate are great when separate, but when they combine they are even more epic. In other words, Reese likes to eat either peanut butter or chocolate, but when he eats them together, he gets additional satisfaction from the combination. His preference over peanut butter (x) and chocolate (y) is represented by the utility function: u(x, y) = xy + x + y Which of the following is NOT true about Reese’s preference? (a) The MRS decreases when x increases.(b) The preferences are homothetic.(c) The marginal utility of y is higher when x = 10 than when x = 5.(d) For any a > 0, Reese prefers the bundle (x =a/2 , y = a/2 ) over either the bundle (x = a, y = 0) or (x = 0, y = a).
Reese thinks peanut butter and chocolate are great when separate, but when they combine they are even more epic. In other words, Reese likes to eat either peanut butter or chocolate, but when he eats them together, he gets additional satisfaction from the combination. His preference over peanut butter (x) and chocolate (y) is represented by the utility function: u(x, y) = xy + x + y Suppose that now Reese loses almost his entire income, so that he is left with only one dollar, i.e. his new income is I0 = 1. If prices are still px = 2, py = 4, what is his new optimal consumption of x and y (Hint: Remember that consumption of both goods must be weakly positive, i.e. x∗ ≥ 0 and y∗ ≥ 0) (a) x∗ = 0.5, y∗ = 0(b) x∗ = 0.25, y∗ = 0(c) x∗ = 0.75, y∗ = 0.25(d) x∗ = 0.75, y∗ = 0(e) x∗ = 0.5, y∗ = 1
TRUE OR FALSE. *If Marvin likes "puto bumbong" more than "bibingka" while Rey likes "bibingka" more than "puto bumbong, the marginal utility from "puto bumbong" will become zero for Rey at fewer units while the marginal utility from "puto bumbong" of Marvin will become zero at higher units of consumption.
The following table shows the marginal utility per dollar of apples and pears for five consumers: Consumer Marginal Utility Per Dollar Apples Pears Darnell 8 5 Eleanor 7 8 Jacques 6 6 Kyoko 5 4.5 Musashi 4 4 Darnell, Eleanor, and Kyoko are not optimizing over their choice of fruit. In the following table, indicate which fruit each consumer should increase consumption of in order to achieve the optimal fruit consumption bundle. Consumer Apples Pears Darnell Eleanor Kyoko
Consider an economy composed of 16 consumers. Of these, 5 consumers each own one right shoe and 11 consumers each own one left shoe. Shoes are indivisible. Everyone has the same utility function, which is Min(2R, L}, where R and L are, respectively, the quantities of right and left shoes con sumed. A) (10%) Is the status quo (where each individual has his own shoe) Pareto efficient? If so, briefly explain why. If not, provide a Pareto improvement b) (10%) Characterize all Pareto efficient allocations
Consider a couple whose behaviour follows the unitary household model. Their preferences can be represented by the utility function: U(CM; CH) = min (CM, CH), where CM, denotes market goods and CH denotes home production. Each spouse can work up to 50 hours per week, and those 50 hours can be divided between market work and home production. Joe and Anna are each paid £20 per hour for market work. Joe produces £20 of home production per hour, while Anna produces £30 per hour of home production. (a)How many hours are each of the spouses allocating to home production and market work? and Suppose that Anna is offered a pay raise, so that her hourly market wage increases to £25, and nothing else changes. Will that change the identity of the spouse who works more hours on the market? Explain your answer.
Suppose that you are given $20,000 to split between two people, Jane and Fred. The income and marginal utility for each of them is shown in the following table. Amount to Jane Amount to Fred MU of Jane's Last Dollar Spent MU of Fred's Last Dollar Spent $ 5,000 $ 15,000 80 65 $ 7,000 $ 13,000 70 70 $ 9,000 $ 11,000 60 75 $ 11,000 $ 9,000 50 80 $ 13,000 $ 7,000 40 85 Instructions: Enter your answers as a whole number. If you want to maximize their combined utility, how much of the $20,000 should go to Jane? How much should go to Fred? Amount to Jane = $ Amount to Fred = $
. Show that Cobb-Douglas preferences are homothetic preferences
Suppose that each week Fiona buys 16 peaches and 4 apples at her local farmer's market. Both kinds of fruit cost $1 each. From this we can infer that: If Fiona is maximizing her utility, then her marginal utility from the 16th peach she buys must be greater than her marginal utility from the 4th apple she buys. Fiona is not maximizing her utility. If Fiona is maximizing her utility, then her marginal utility from the 16th peach she buys must be equal to her marginal utility from the 4th apple she buys. The law of diminishing marginal utility does not hold for Fiona.
Refer to Figure 21-22. When the price of X is $80, the price of Y is $20, and the consumer’s income is $160, the consumer’s optimal choice is D. Then the price of X decreases to $20. The income effect can be illustrated as the movement from Group of answer choices D to E. D to C. C to E. E to D.