Consider a pure exchange economy with 2 consumers, 1 and 2, who trade financial assets. There are two states of the world, a and b. State a occurs with probability 2/3 and state b occurs with probability 1/3. Two assets are traded: money in state a and money in state b. Consumer 1 is risk neutral (i.e. has von Neumann-Morgenstern utility u(x) x) and consumer 2 is risk averse with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility v(x) = √√√x. Consumer 1's endowment is (6,6) and consumer 2's endowment is (0, 4); that is, consumer 1 is endowed with 6 dollars in each state while consumer 2 is endowed with 0 dollars in state a and 4 dollars in state b. =

Consider a pure exchange economy with 2 consumers, 1 and 2, who trade financial assets. There are two states of the world, a and b. State a occurs with probability 2/3 and state b occurs with probability 1/3. Two assets are traded: money in state a and money in state b. Consumer 1 is risk neutral (i.e. has von Neumann-Morgenstern utility u(x) x) and consumer 2 is risk averse with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility v(x) = √√√x. Consumer 1's endowment is (6,6) and consumer 2's endowment is (0, 4); that is, consumer 1 is endowed with 6 dollars in each state while consumer 2 is endowed with 0 dollars in state a and 4 dollars in state b. =

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose that the buyers do not know the quality of any particular bicycle for sale, but the sellers do knowthe quality of the bike they sell. The price at which a bike is traded is determined by demand and supply.Each buyer wants at most one bicycle.(ii) Assuming that each buyer purchases a bike only if its expected quality is higher than the price,and each seller is willing to sell their bike only if the price exceeds their valuation, what is theequilibrium outcome in this market?
Why is information asymmetry not a problem if both parties to an agreementwant the same thing?
Consider an economy with two agents where agents A and B where both have the same risk attitude given by u(x)=ln(x). Suppose in state 1, only agent A has a job that earns $3 and B does not earn anything. In state 2, only B works and earns $2. Solve for the equilibrium in this economy when mutual insurance is feasible. Assume both states are equally likely.
A strategy for player 1 is a value for x1 from the set X. Similarly, a strategyfor player 2 is a value for x2 from the set X. Player 1’s payoff is V1(x1, x2) =5 + x1 - 2x2 and player 2’s payoff is V2(x1, x2) = 5 + x2 - 2x1.a. Assume that X is the interval of real numbers from 1 to 4 (including 1and 4). (Note that this is much more than integers and includes such numbers as 2.648 and 1.00037). Derive all Nash equilibria.b. Now assume that the game is played infinitely often and a player’s payoff is the present value of his stream of single-period payoffs, where dis the discount factor.(i) Assume that X is composed of only two values: 2 and 3; thus, aplayer can choose 2 or 3, but no other value. Consider the followingsymmetric strategy profile: In period 1, a player chooses the value 2. In period t(≥2), a player chooses the value 2. In period a player chooses the value 2 if both players chose 2 in all previous periods; otherwise, she chooses the value 3. Derive conditions which ensure…
BPO Services is in the business of digitizing information from forms that are filled out by hand. In 2006, a big client gave BPO a distribution of the forms that it digitized in house last year, and BPO estimated how much it would cost to digitize each form. Form Type Mix of Forms Form Cost A 0.5 $3.00 B 0.5 $1.00 The expected cost of digitizing a form is . Suppose the client and BPO agree to a deal, whereby the client pays BPO to digitize forms. The price of each form processed is equal to the expected cost of the form that you calculated in the previous part of the problem. Suppose that after the agreement, the client sends only forms of type A. The expected digitization cost per form of the forms sent by the client is . This leads to an expected loss of per form for BPO. (Hint: Do not round your answers. Enter the loss as a positive number.)
The blue curve on the following graph shows the tradeoff between security and tourism; that is, combinations of security and tourism above the blue curve are not possible, and those on or below the curve are possible. The vertical axis measures security, defined as the probability that a terrorist is intercepted before entering the country. The horizontal axis measures the number of yearly visitors to the United States, in millions. Suppose that before 9/11, there were 55 million visitors per year, and the probability of intercepting any particular terrorist at customs and immigration was 10%, as indicated by the purple point (diamond symbol). After the 9/11 attacks, a debate is held in Congress. Members of both parties agree that security measures need to be improved. However, there is some disagreement as to how much additional security is needed. Suppose the first bill that is introduced mandates that security be improved so that the probability of catching a terrorist at the border…
(Bets as insurance) Suppose that P1 = P2 = P, that P(Y = 1) = P(Y = 2) = ½, that if Y (ω) = 1, then (W1, W2)(ω) = (1, 0), and that if Y (ω) = 2, then (W1, W2)(ω) = (0, 1). Show that if u1 and u2 are strictly concave, increasing expected utility functions, there are acceptable bets making both strictly better off. Show that this is not true if u1 and u2 are linear.
Consider the St. Petersburg Paradox problem first discussed by Daniel Bernoulli in 1738. The game consists of tossing a coin. The player gets a payoff of 2^n where n is the number of times the coin is tossed to get the first head. So, if the sequence of tosses yields TTTH, you get a payoff of 2^4 this payoff occurs with probability (1/2^4). Compute the expected value of playing this game. Next, assume that utility U is a function of wealth X given by U = X.5 and that X = $1,000,000. In this part of the question, assume that the game ends if the first head has not occurred after 40 tosses of the coin. In that case, the payoff is 240 and the game is over. What is the expected payout of this game? Finally, what is the most you would pay to play the game if you require that your expected utility after playing the game must be equal to your utility before playing the game? Use the Goal Seek function (found in Data, What-If Analysis) in Excel.
An amount of money is accumulating; in period t (= 1, 2, . . . , T) its size is $2t. In each period two people simultaneously decide whether to claim the money. If only one person does so, she gets all the money; if both people do so, they split the money equally; and if neither person does so, both people have the opportunity to do so in the next period. If neither person claims the money in period T, each person obtains $T. Each person cares only about the amount of money she obtains. Formulate this situation as an extensive game with perfect information and simultaneous moves, and find its subgame perfect equilibria). (Start by considering the cases T = 1 and T = 2.)
Max Pentridge is thinking of starting a pinball palace near a large Melbourne university. His utility is given by u(W) = 1 - (5,000/W), where W is his wealth. Max's total wealth is $10,000. With probability p = 0.9 the palace will succeed and Max's wealth will grow from $10,000 to $x. With probability 1 - p the palace will be a failure and he’ll lose $5,000, so that his wealth will be just $5,000. What is the smallest value of x that would be sufficient to make Max want to invest in the pinball palace rather than have a wealth of $10,000 with certainty? ____ (Please round your final answer to the whole dollar, if necessary)
A woman with current wealth X has the opportunity to bet an amount on the occurrence of an event that she knows will occur with probability P. If she wagers W, she will received 2W, if the event occur and if it does not. Assume that the Bernoulli utility function takes the form u(x) = with r > 0. How much should she wager? Does her utility function exhibit CARA, DARA, IARA? Alex plays football for a local club in Kumasi. If he does not suffer any injury by the end of the season, he will get a professional contract with Kotoko, which is worth $10,000. If he is injured though, he will get a contract as a fitness coach worth $100. The probability of the injury is 10%. Describe the lottery What is the expected value of this lottery? What is the expected utility of this lottery if u(x) = Assume he could buy insurance at price P that could pay $9,900 in case of injury. What is the highest value of P that makes it worthwhile for Alex to purchase insurance? What is the certainty…
An investor has a von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function, u(c)=-e^(-αc), where c represents consumption and α > 0. There are two equally probable states of nature, called 1 and 2, and two assets that can be acquired, each of which is attractive in a state of nature as follows: Each unit of asset 1 yields one unit of consumption in state 1 and nothing in state 2. Each unit of asset 2 yields nothing in state 1 and one unit of consumption in state 2. The price of each asset i is denoted by πi, which are normalized to π1 + π2 = 1. The investor has a monetary wealth of w units that must be distributed between the two assets. Denote xi the number of units of asset i that he acquires. Formulate the investor's expected utility maximization problem, subject to your budget constraint. Find the optimal quantities x of each asset i for this investor. How do these amounts of assets vary according to the α parameter? What is the economic interpretation of this relationship?