Consider the analysis described in Figure 20.6.  Tom and Dick each earn $25,000 per year.  Tom has a spouse and two children, and Dick is unmarried.  Health insurance and other goods trade off dollar for dollar (there is no tax advantage to health insurance).  (a) Where would each of the two be located on the budget constraint, and why?  (b) Which of the two would more likely take up a health insurance program, such as Medicaid? (c) How would your answers to the first two parts change if health insurance were subsidized (as it is) relative to all other goods?

Microeconomic Theory
12th Edition
ISBN:9781337517942
Author:NICHOLSON
Publisher:NICHOLSON
Chapter18: Asymmetric Information
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 18.5P
icon
Related questions
Question

Question 5:  Consider the analysis described in Figure 20.6.  Tom and Dick each earn $25,000 per year.  Tom has a spouse and two children, and Dick is unmarried.  Health insurance and other goods trade off dollar for dollar (there is no tax advantage to health insurance).  (a) Where would each of the two be located on the budget constraint, and why?  (b) Which of the two would more likely take up a health insurance program, such as Medicaid? (c) How would your answers to the first two parts change if health insurance were subsidized (as it is) relative to all other goods?

ey
kinked set
insurance, such as those at point E, will enroll in the public sector, because utility level V
of segments ABMC. Responding to the public coverage, people with low values of private
(passing through point M) is higher than V. Households with a high valuation of insurance
Households cannot purc
must return to the original budget constraint.
Values insurance
relatively more, V,
Leads to equilibrium
point D
enoisibbA
Health
insurance
V,'
M'
Increasingly generous public
insurance leads to substitution
Mof public insurance M for private
insurance B (crowd-out), or no
insurance C (take-up).
Values insurance
relatively less, V,
Leads to equilibrium
point E
B
0.
All other goods
C
Figure 20.6 Analyzing the Economics of Take-Up and Crowd-Out
530
Transcribed Image Text:ey kinked set insurance, such as those at point E, will enroll in the public sector, because utility level V of segments ABMC. Responding to the public coverage, people with low values of private (passing through point M) is higher than V. Households with a high valuation of insurance Households cannot purc must return to the original budget constraint. Values insurance relatively more, V, Leads to equilibrium point D enoisibbA Health insurance V,' M' Increasingly generous public insurance leads to substitution Mof public insurance M for private insurance B (crowd-out), or no insurance C (take-up). Values insurance relatively less, V, Leads to equilibrium point E B 0. All other goods C Figure 20.6 Analyzing the Economics of Take-Up and Crowd-Out 530
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Microeconomic Theory
Microeconomic Theory
Economics
ISBN:
9781337517942
Author:
NICHOLSON
Publisher:
Cengage