Determine attribute weights and use the nondimensional scaling technique to find the resulting set of vehicle scores. Fill in the table below. (Round to two decimal places.) Final score SUV 1 0.15 More Info Alternatives Which alternative should be chosen using the additive weighting technique? Choose the correct answer below. O Sport utility vehicle 1 Sport utility vehicle 2 SUV 2 0.86 - X

Practical Management Science
6th Edition
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Chapter2: Introduction To Spreadsheet Modeling
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 20P: Julie James is opening a lemonade stand. She believes the fixed cost per week of running the stand...
icon
Related questions
Question

I got this question wrong those are the correct answer please help me.

Two sport utility vehicles (SUVs) are being considered by a recent engineering graduate. Using the following data evaluate which sport utility vehicle is better. Use six attributes in your analysis: price
point, overall appearance, comfort, safety, reliability, and fuel mileage. Larger scores on overall appearance, comfort, safety, reliability, and fuel mileage are preferred to smaller ones.
Click the icon to view the table with data you have gathered about the SUVs.
Determine attribute weights and use the nondimensional scaling technique to find the resulting set of vehicle scores. Fill in the table below. (Round to two decimal places.)
Final score
Sport utility vehicle 1
Sport utility vehicle 2
Which alternative should be chosen using the additive weighting technique? Choose the correct answer below.
More Info
Attribute
Price
Appearance
Comfort
Safety
Reliability
Fuel mileage
SUV 1
0.15
Relative
Rank
4
2
5
3
6
1
Alternatives
SUV 2
0.86
Alternatives
SUV 1
$27,650
4
3
3
3
22 mpg
SUV 2
$21,900
3
5
4
4
18 mpg
Transcribed Image Text:Two sport utility vehicles (SUVs) are being considered by a recent engineering graduate. Using the following data evaluate which sport utility vehicle is better. Use six attributes in your analysis: price point, overall appearance, comfort, safety, reliability, and fuel mileage. Larger scores on overall appearance, comfort, safety, reliability, and fuel mileage are preferred to smaller ones. Click the icon to view the table with data you have gathered about the SUVs. Determine attribute weights and use the nondimensional scaling technique to find the resulting set of vehicle scores. Fill in the table below. (Round to two decimal places.) Final score Sport utility vehicle 1 Sport utility vehicle 2 Which alternative should be chosen using the additive weighting technique? Choose the correct answer below. More Info Attribute Price Appearance Comfort Safety Reliability Fuel mileage SUV 1 0.15 Relative Rank 4 2 5 3 6 1 Alternatives SUV 2 0.86 Alternatives SUV 1 $27,650 4 3 3 3 22 mpg SUV 2 $21,900 3 5 4 4 18 mpg
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 3 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Practical Management Science
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781337406659
Author:
WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Operations Management
Operations Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259667473
Author:
William J Stevenson
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259666100
Author:
F. Robert Jacobs, Richard B Chase
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Business in Action
Business in Action
Operations Management
ISBN:
9780135198100
Author:
BOVEE
Publisher:
PEARSON CO
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781285869681
Author:
Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781478623069
Author:
Steven Nahmias, Tava Lennon Olsen
Publisher:
Waveland Press, Inc.