Do rats take more time on average than hamsters to travel through a maze? The table below shows the times in seconds that the rats and hamsters took. Rats: 12, 30, 34, 42, 28, 20, 47, 33, 24, 53 Hamsters: 33, 29, 23, 15, 19, 20, 42, 25 Assume that both populations follow a normal distribution. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance level of significance?

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter10: Statistics
Section10.4: Distributions Of Data
Problem 19PFA
icon
Related questions
icon
Concept explainers
Question

need help with: D,E,F , G, H

please thank you !

Do rats take more time on average than hamsters to travel through a maze? The table below shows the times in
seconds that the rats and hamsters took.
Rats: 12, 30, 34,
42, 28,
20, 47, 33, 24, 53
Hamsters: 33, 29,
23,
15, 19,
20,
42,
25
Assume that both populations follow a normal distribution. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of
significance level of significance?
For this study, we should use
Select an answer
a. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:
Но:
Select an answer
Select an answer
(please enter a decimal)
?
H1:
Select an answer
(Please enter a decimal)
?
Select an answer
b. The test statistic ?
(please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)
c. The p-value =
d. The p-value is ?
(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
e. Based on this, we should Select an answer
O the null hypothesis.
f. Thus, the final conclusion is that
OThe results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that
the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is more than the population mean time to
complete the maze for hamsters.
OThe results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to
conclude that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is equal to the population
mean time to complete the maze for hamsters.
OThe results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude
that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is more than the population mean time
to complete the maze for hamsters.
Transcribed Image Text:Do rats take more time on average than hamsters to travel through a maze? The table below shows the times in seconds that the rats and hamsters took. Rats: 12, 30, 34, 42, 28, 20, 47, 33, 24, 53 Hamsters: 33, 29, 23, 15, 19, 20, 42, 25 Assume that both populations follow a normal distribution. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance level of significance? For this study, we should use Select an answer a. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Но: Select an answer Select an answer (please enter a decimal) ? H1: Select an answer (Please enter a decimal) ? Select an answer b. The test statistic ? (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) c. The p-value = d. The p-value is ? (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) e. Based on this, we should Select an answer O the null hypothesis. f. Thus, the final conclusion is that OThe results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is more than the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters. OThe results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is equal to the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters. OThe results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is more than the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters.
to complete the maze for hamsters.
OThe results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that
the mean time to complete the maze for the ten rats is more than the mean time to complete the
maze for the eight hamsters.
g. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.
OThere is a 10.44% chance of a Type I error.
Olf the sample mean time to complete the maze for the 10 rats is the same as the sample mean time to
complete the maze for the 8 hamsters and if another 10 rats and 8 hamsters are observed then there
would be a 10.44% chance of concluding that the mean time to complete the maze for the 10 rats is
at least 6.6 seconds longer than the mean time to complete the maze for the 8 hamsters.
If the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is the same as the population mean time to
complete the maze for hamsters and if another 10 rats and 8 hamsters are observed then there would
be a 10.44% chance that the mean time to complete the maze for the 10 rats would be at least 6.6
seconds longer than the mean time to complete the maze for the 8 hamsters.
There is a 10.44% chance that the mean time to complete the maze for the 10 rats is at least 6.6
seconds longer than the mean time to complete the maze for the 8 hamsters.
h. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.
OThere is a 1% chance that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats and hamsters is
the same.
OIf the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is the same as the population mean time to
complete the maze for hamsters and if another 10 rats and 8 hamsters are observed then there would
be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the population mean time to complete
the maze for rats is more than the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters
OThere is a 1% chance that the rat will eat the hamster.
OIf the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is the same as the population mean time to
complete the maze for hamsters and if another 10 rats and 8 hamsters are observed, then there
would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the sample mean time to
complete the maze for these 10 rats and 8 hamsters differ from each other.
Transcribed Image Text:to complete the maze for hamsters. OThe results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean time to complete the maze for the ten rats is more than the mean time to complete the maze for the eight hamsters. g. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. OThere is a 10.44% chance of a Type I error. Olf the sample mean time to complete the maze for the 10 rats is the same as the sample mean time to complete the maze for the 8 hamsters and if another 10 rats and 8 hamsters are observed then there would be a 10.44% chance of concluding that the mean time to complete the maze for the 10 rats is at least 6.6 seconds longer than the mean time to complete the maze for the 8 hamsters. If the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is the same as the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters and if another 10 rats and 8 hamsters are observed then there would be a 10.44% chance that the mean time to complete the maze for the 10 rats would be at least 6.6 seconds longer than the mean time to complete the maze for the 8 hamsters. There is a 10.44% chance that the mean time to complete the maze for the 10 rats is at least 6.6 seconds longer than the mean time to complete the maze for the 8 hamsters. h. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study. OThere is a 1% chance that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats and hamsters is the same. OIf the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is the same as the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters and if another 10 rats and 8 hamsters are observed then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is more than the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters OThere is a 1% chance that the rat will eat the hamster. OIf the population mean time to complete the maze for rats is the same as the population mean time to complete the maze for hamsters and if another 10 rats and 8 hamsters are observed, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the sample mean time to complete the maze for these 10 rats and 8 hamsters differ from each other.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 7 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Correlation, Regression, and Association
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill