Does the average Presbyterian donate a different amount of money compared to the average Catholic in church on Sundays? The 55 randomly observed members of the Presbyterian church donated an average of $23 with a standard deviation of $6. The 41 randomly observed members of the Catholic church donated an average of $25 with a standard deviation of $10. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Họ: Select an answer ♥ Select an answer ♥ Select an answer |(please enter a decimal)

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
Does the average Presbyterian donate a different amount of money compared to the average Catholic in
church on Sundays? The 55 randomly observed members of the Presbyterian church donated an average of
$23 with a standard deviation of $6. The 41 randomly observed members of the Catholic church donated an
average of $25 with a standard deviation of $10. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of
significance?
a. For this study, we should use Select an answer
b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:
Ho: Select an answer v Select an answer v Selec r v (please enter a decimal)
an answe
Hị: Select an answer vSelect an answer v
Select an answer v (Please enter a decimal)
c. The test statistic
(please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)
d. The p-value =
e. The p-value is ? -a
f. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis.
g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...
(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude
that the population mean amount of money that Presbyterians donate is a different amount of
money compared to the population mean amount of money that Catholics donate.
O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significant
evidence to conclude that the population mean amount of money that Presbyterians donate is
equal to the population mean amount of money that Catholics donate.
O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to
conclude that the population mean amount of money that Presbyterians donate is a different
amount of money compared to the population mean amount of money that Catholics donate.
O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude
that the mean donation for the 55 Presbyterians that were observed is a different amount of
money compared to the mean donation for the 41 Catholics that were observed.
Transcribed Image Text:Does the average Presbyterian donate a different amount of money compared to the average Catholic in church on Sundays? The 55 randomly observed members of the Presbyterian church donated an average of $23 with a standard deviation of $6. The 41 randomly observed members of the Catholic church donated an average of $25 with a standard deviation of $10. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: Select an answer v Select an answer v Selec r v (please enter a decimal) an answe Hị: Select an answer vSelect an answer v Select an answer v (Please enter a decimal) c. The test statistic (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) d. The p-value = e. The p-value is ? -a f. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis. g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean amount of money that Presbyterians donate is a different amount of money compared to the population mean amount of money that Catholics donate. O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean amount of money that Presbyterians donate is equal to the population mean amount of money that Catholics donate. O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean amount of money that Presbyterians donate is a different amount of money compared to the population mean amount of money that Catholics donate. O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean donation for the 55 Presbyterians that were observed is a different amount of money compared to the mean donation for the 41 Catholics that were observed.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman